 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Mac Forum / Applications / Word / July 2006Unusual paragraph marks--cursor appears AFTER them, etc.
I am an expert Word user, but have received a batch of files that exhibit strange behavior--if I Show the nonprinting characters, I see spaces and paragraph marks; if, however, I start applying styles, I find that the style carries from one line to another (I don't want it on the second line, I want a different style, but it's clearly seeing the style of the line before). I was puzzled because there appears to be a paragraph mark between these lines, so I couldn't understand what was happening. I then realized that I could actually click the cursor into position AFTER the paragraph mark--i.e., if I Hide the nonprinting characters, the cursor looks like it's appearing after an extra space character. I've tried a few things such as doing a global Replace of all instances of ^p, but I actually get a message that there are no ^p found. Let me emphasize that when I do "Show," I'm not seeing simple line breaks--i.e., the L-shaped arrow character...I am getting the pilcrow character. I've also tried copying and pasting the character into the Replace dialog so that I could Replace with ^p, but the Replace dialog sees it as a space, too. As a result, I'm having to go through and replace each of these apparent paragraph marks with a real hard return in Word before I can apply styles. Has anyone heard of this before? Sounds like a corrupt document. Try copying all but the very last paragraph mark in the document and pasting into a blank new document. Any help?  Signature***Please always reply to the newsgroup!*** Beth Rosengard MacOffice MVP Mac Word FAQ: <http://word.mvps.org/Mac/WordMacHome.html> My Site: <http://www.bethrosengard.com> On 7/25/06 8:56 AM, in article 11813E04-57EF-42C7-8DF3-E7AB867A0586@microsoft.com, "colmcse2001" > I am an expert Word user, but have received a batch of files that exhibit > strange behavior--if I Show the nonprinting characters, I see spaces and [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Has anyone heard of this before? Hi, and thanks. Oops--I just noticed that though I chose "Word" as the forum in which to post, this appears to be Mac Word--I'm on PC. Does that make a difference? At any rate, I tried copying all but the last para mark and pasting into a black doc, but still have the odd paragraph marks--it's so strange that the cursor can appear AFTER one of them! Also, it's happened in 16 files so far, so corruption seems unlikely. So strange... > Sounds like a corrupt document. Try copying all but the very last paragraph > mark in the document and pasting into a blank new document. Any help? [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > > > Has anyone heard of this before? You'll probably get more direct response in the PC Word group, although the versions are not that different in most respects - its just that the PC group gets a lot more traffic :) In the meantime here a few thoughts & questions: I've never seen the 'ghost' para marks as you describe in more than 15 yrs. on both platforms, other than in a corrupted doc. Where did the 'batch' of files come from - were they created in Word (what version) or some other program? If another program, what, and how were they converted to Word docs? Anything else you can share about the origin of the files. What version of Word are *you* using? It sounds like you're working in Print Layout View - in which case you may not be able to see them -but I believe you're dealing with Continuous Section Breaks. Turn on the Show/Hide & switch to Normal View... see if double dotted lines labeled as Section Break (Continuous ) shows up at the problem locations. That would explain why you can place the insertion point to the right of the pilcrow & there looks like a space with Show/Hide turned off. If so, you can move the pointer to the left edge of the break & click when the pointer looks like a white arrow leaning to the right, then press Backspace or Delete to remove the break. That alone may be helpful in reformatting the doc, but there is probably more to it involving the Styles & settings used in the docs. More info may also be asked for, like is it just the next para that gets reformatted, all paras forward of that para, several successive paras, etc. If all else fails you can use the Recover Text from Any File feature in the File Type list of the Open dialog & then reformat as you please with the styles you want to use. SignatureRegards |:>) Bob Jones [MVP] Office:Mac > Hi, and thanks. > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] >> > >> > Has anyone heard of this before? It's definitely odd--I've been using Word for nearly as long (almost daily since about 1992, and on both platforms--including those all-in-one little-monochrome-screen Macs :-) ), and have NEVER seen such paragraph marks; I guess I've never had a doc that was corrupted in that way... Thanks for the suggestions--I tried the Normal view and Show, but no such luck: there are no section breaks. Oddest thing. Maybe I'll try in the PC view. According to the file information, the files were last saved in "Word 10.0," and that's all I know at this point. I am using Word 2002 SP3 (10.6612.6626). Maybe I'll try that Recover Text from Any File; I've alread tried saving one as an RTF and then reopening, but no change. So weird--this is definitely the oddest thing I've ever seen Word do! Thanks again. > You'll probably get more direct response in the PC Word group, although the > versions are not that different in most respects - its just that the PC [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] > >> > > >> > Has anyone heard of this before? The only other thing I can think of is if some sort of weird protection scheme has been used. Even so the pilcrows wouldn't be gray & the section breaks should show up. I truly don't know what else to suggest :( SignatureRegards |:>) Bob Jones [MVP] Office:Mac > It's definitely odd--I've been using Word for nearly as long (almost daily > since about 1992, and on both platforms--including those all-in-one [quoted text clipped - 130 lines] >> >> > >> >> > Has anyone heard of this before? Thanks for responding--the cool thing is that even though saving as RTF didn't work, I just tried saving as HTML, Filtered; then closed the file; reopened the file and the paragraph marks behave normally. I then copy and paste into my template. So at least it's a decent workaround, and beats all the manual backspacing and hard-returning :-) > The only other thing I can think of is if some sort of weird protection > scheme has been used. Even so the pilcrows wouldn't be gray & the section [quoted text clipped - 134 lines] > >> >> > > >> >> > Has anyone heard of this before? I had thought about suggesting that because for a while this was the new suggested method of getting rid of weird stuff in this very group by the very on MVP. But I was leaving it up to the MVP's to suggest it. When they didn't I was surprised. I didn't want to be perceived as a dunce if it didn't work. I usually feel like one most of the time anyway. > Thanks for responding--the cool thing is that even though saving as RTF > didn't work, I just tried saving as HTML, Filtered; then closed the file; [quoted text clipped - 140 lines] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Has anyone heard of this before? Signature------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phillip M. Jones, CET |LIFE MEMBER: VPEA ETA-I, NESDA, ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112 |pjones@kimbanet.com, ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! mailto:pjones@kimbanet.com <http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm> <http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/90th_Birthday/index.htm> <http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/Fulcher/default.html> <http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/Harris/default.htm> <http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/Jones/default.htm> <http://www.vpea.org> Hi Phillip - Don't ever hesitate to offer a suggestion as long as you've tested it enough to have valid confidence in it & are *reasonably* certain that it won't cause any harm. My understanding is that even an "educated guess" is acceptable as long as it is clearly indicated as such rather than being touted as a sure-fire cure. 'Responsible' & 'accountable' seem to be pretty good guidelines to folow :) SignatureRegards |:>) Bob Jones [MVP] Office:Mac >I had thought about suggesting that because for a while this was the new >suggested method of getting rid of weird stuff in this very group by the [quoted text clipped - 159 lines] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Has anyone heard of this before? And the reason that I, for one, didn't suggest it is that I've never seen this method work before, even though it's supposed to :-). I tried it myself on a corrupt document once and nothing happened, though doing a Maggie (copying all but the last paragraph mark) did. I'm glad to know that it actually does work in some situations! Signature***Please always reply to the newsgroup!*** Beth Rosengard MacOffice MVP Mac Word FAQ: <http://word.mvps.org/Mac/WordMacHome.html> My Site: <http://www.bethrosengard.com> On 7/26/06 11:24 AM, in article OO$Y1COsGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, > I had thought about suggesting that because for a while this was the new > suggested method of getting rid of weird stuff in this very group by the > very on MVP. But I was leaving it up to the MVP's to suggest it. When > they didn't I was surprised. I didn't want to be perceived as a dunce if > it didn't work. I usually feel like one most of the time anyway. I dismissed that one because a) I somehow got the impression you had already tried it, and b) although the technique is definitely effective for many *similar* situations where extraneous stuff shows up it didn't seem to fit here. Those situations normally don't involve pilcrows that turn on/off with Show/Hide and the characters are typically the same intensity as the other content... it just shows up as 'garbage'. I've tried copying from any number of web sites & pasting using every option Paste Special has to offer & still haven't ever seen any such situation. Anyway, I'm glad you found the solution & I'll try to keep it in mind in case there is a 'next time' - although I'd still love to know how it came about :) Thanks for posting back with the info! SignatureRegards |:>) Bob Jones [MVP] Office:Mac > Thanks for responding--the cool thing is that even though saving as RTF > didn't work, I just tried saving as HTML, Filtered; then closed the file; [quoted text clipped - 164 lines] >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Has anyone heard of this before? Next time, use Save As "Web Page" but NOT "Filtered" :-) "Filtered" removes the XML that upsets the web purists, but in doing so it also removes the extra attributes (such as section breaks, headers, footers, fields) that make a Word document a "document". I can't be sure what the problem was, and you've solved it now so it doesn't matter, but I suspect you came up against a Word 2002 "Style Separator". This was a truly silly idea introduced in Word 2002 to enable people to create run-in headings. It looks and behaves like a greyed-out paragraph mark, but it does not produce a line break. They came to their senses and removed it in Word 2003 (and Mac BU was not silly enough to replicate it in Mac Word). The cure, if you see another one, is to Delete it :-) Word Mac probably treats it as a "protected" character, so you may have to move the rest of the text out from around it then delete the whole "paragraph" to get it out. To replace the Style Separator, the PC lot came up with something even stupider: "Partially applied styles". Documentation professionals are inclined to suffer laughter-based injury just thinking about the nonsense that "partially-applied" and "Styles" conjures up. But they do enable people to create run-in headings while trashing their document formatting :-) Cheers On 27/7/06 3:06 AM, in article E2497AA7-DD3B-46C2-AEDD-44DEE599A3F6@microsoft.com, "colmcse2001" > Thanks for responding--the cool thing is that even though saving as RTF > didn't work, I just tried saving as HTML, Filtered; then closed the file; [quoted text clipped - 140 lines] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Has anyone heard of this before? SignaturePlease reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email me unless I ask you to. John McGhie <john@mcghie.name> Microsoft MVP, Word and Word for Macintosh. Consultant Technical Writer Sydney, Australia +61 (0) 4 1209 1410 |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.