> Hi Guys.
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Leigh
No. That's why I didn't answer the first time :-)
Yes, we know "what" is causing it. But "No", you can't do anything about
it.
There's a cross-platform work-around to deal with the graphics
incompatibilities between the two platforms. Whenever the graphic hits the
"other" platform, Word converts it into the native format for that platform.
To avoid having to do this every time, it stores the conversion in the
document for fast display.
If you add a PICT to a Mac document, or PNG to a PC document, it will be
converted on the other platform. When it is converted, you end up with four
copies of the image in the document: the original and the low-resolution
"display" version on the Mac, and a High-res and low-res conversion on the
PC.
You might find that if you use PNG as the format for the graphics, it won't
be converted on either platform, so you won't get the bloat. Worth a try?
Cheers
On 30/1/06 10:45 AM, in article
85DD95A7-8CAD-4F58-8E87-EAA84B794AA1@microsoft.com, "leejav"
> anyone have any ideas?
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>> Leigh

Signature
Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.
John McGhie <john@mcghie.name>
Microsoft MVP, Word and Word for Macintosh. Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 (0) 4 1209 1410
leejav - 22 Feb 2006 00:47 GMT
sorry about that. i'm just an impatient bugger.
i did read up on this problem before posting but i couldn't understand that
a blank word document created on a pc then copied to a mac wouldn't have the
same problem. i could import the graphics freely on the mac and then copy the
file back to a PC with no bloating.
I thought this might have been a different problem.
The graphics we were using were simple jpg images, which i thought would
have been standard on both machines anyway.
We never managed to get around the problem, we just told the client the
issues which they accepted.
cheers anyway. :)
Leigh
"John McGhie [MVP - Word and Word Macinto" wrote:
> No. That's why I didn't answer the first time :-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> >>
> >> Leigh
John McGhie - 22 Feb 2006 02:36 GMT
Thanks Leigh:
Nothing "simple" about a JPEG :-) There's about four different
formats, at least two different colour standards and all manner of
"extensions" to the format.
They're extremely complex.
Office on the PC and Office on the Mac can handle only "some" of the
possible permutations of JPEG, and regrettably, they can't each handle
ALL of the formats the other can use.
Sorry about that.
Cheers
>sorry about that. i'm just an impatient bugger.
>
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>> >>
>> >> Leigh

Signature
Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.
John McGhie <john@mcghie.name>
Microsoft MVP, Word and Word for Macintosh. Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410