Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Other MS Products / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Moving away from SFM...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Will - 29 Jun 2006 15:06 GMT
In our environment we've got 5 W2003 servers that are running SFM to provide
file sharing to various versions of OS 9 an OS X Mac clients.  Four of these
servers are connected to a highly available and replicated SAN, with the
fifth server fronting a NAS for larger files and archiving.  Ours is an
organization with an approximate 50% annual storage growth and a requirement
to continue to keep older files into the future.

Given the limitations of SFM, and taking into account that we already have
tens of thousands of "Mac" files on file shares, I want to eliminate the SFM
installations completely without disrupting the way our Mac users currently
get to their files.  Clustering, a big no-no, with SFM is high on the list of
things we'd like to do with our file servers.  I know that ExtremeZ-IP will
solve the clustering issue we have, and shouldn't cause any issues with the
existing files.

As well, we'd like to look into automated archival products, like EMC's Disk
Extender...but I'm very concerned about the resource file alternate file
stream holding us back on that.  Even with a third party application, we're
still going to have this issue with the resource fork, yes?

Also, am I reading correctly when I see that ExtremeZ-IP would allow us to
remove all of our Dave and ADmitMac installations on the Mac clients?

Anyone who can shed some light on these questions would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Will
reidlewis@grouplogic.com - 30 Jun 2006 04:02 GMT
> I know that ExtremeZ-IP will
> solve the clustering issue we have, and shouldn't cause any issues with the
> existing files.

You are correct on both points.  ExtremeZ-IP works well with
Microsoft's MSCS clusters up to 8 nodes and uses the same file format
as SFM ensuring file compatibility.

> Also, am I reading correctly when I see that ExtremeZ-IP would allow us to
> remove all of our Dave and ADmitMac installations on the Mac clients?

Correct.  ExtremeZ-IP File Server supports the file sharing client and
secure authentication modules built into every Mac so there's no need
to install or maintain any third-party client software.

Please contact info@grouplogic.com if you have other questions.

Best success!

- Reid

T. Reid Lewis
Group Logic, Inc.
1110 N. Glebe Rd, Suite 450, Arlington, VA 22201  USA
Web: www.grouplogic.com

Creators and publishers of:
ExtremeZ-IP File Server: Macintosh file server for Windows
2003/XP/2000/NT
ExtremeZ-IP Print Server: Macintosh print server for Windows
2003/XP/2000/NT
MassTransit: automated file transfer solution for Windows & Macintosh
Installation, integration and professional services for our products
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.