I appreciate your opinion of MS software to which you are fully entitled.
I would expect, however, that the reason for lack of response is the age of
the software & OS version involved. There are most likely very few - if
any - participants in the newsgroup with a memory sharp enough to accurately
recall that far back and those who might be willing to respond would want to
confirm their suggestions first. That *might* be difficult since it's just
as unlikely that there happen to be folks tuned in here who have such a
configuration sitting around "just in case".
Responsible replies are not based on speculation & guesswork... or obviously
prejudiced disinformation. The silence - unfortunate as it may be - is based
on a matter of principle & newsgroup ettiquette observed by mature
individuals: If you don't have a constructive reply to offer, don't reply at
all.

Signature
Regards |:>)
Bob Jones
[MVP] Office:Mac
>> Thanks for your insightful & constructive contribution - perhaps you can
>> provide some equally enlightening suggestions on how the OP might "Switch
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> try to get decent images out of various versions of Microsoft's garbage
> for years with absolutely no success.
Anybody - 01 May 2008 01:54 GMT
> I appreciate your opinion of MS software to which you are fully entitled.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> individuals: If you don't have a constructive reply to offer, don't reply at
> all.
All you've done is say the same thing I said, just using far more words.
Nobody actually knows how to make Microsoft's programms work as they
should work, not even the so-called experts at Microsoft itself.
This blurry problem happens with every version I've ever had the
misfortune to use under both OS9 and OSX, although I will say I have
not yet been forced into using the new 2008 versions.
Jeff Chapman - 02 May 2008 12:06 GMT
To my recollection, PPT 2002 for Windows had "fuzzy picture" problems as
well. I remember that the screen quality in slide edit mode of JPEGs was far
less than stellar. The images looked better in slide show mode. And I
believe that the JPEGs displayed much more clearly in PPT 2003/Win. I wonder
what that whole issue was all about. I could never pin it down, but I
remember that this aspect of PPT 2002/Win was a sort of a de-evolution in my
mind for that reason.
On the Mac side, fortunately JPEGs posted in slide edit mode in PPT 2008/Mac
look fairly crisp. They seem to look a little better in slide show mode for
some reason. But the difference is hardly noticeable. So whatever issues
there were with PPT 2004/Mac regarding JPEG display quality seem to have
been addressed.
Jeff Chapman
On 08/05/01 9:54, in article
010520081254521968%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com, "Anybody"
<anybody@anywhere-anytime.com> wrote:
>> I appreciate your opinion of MS software to which you are fully entitled.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> misfortune to use under both OS9 and OSX, although I will say I have
> not yet been forced into using the new 2008 versions.