Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Programming / Mac Programming / January 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fixing Open Powerplant License

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Andy Dent - 24 Jan 2006 14:50 GMT
Is anybody left with connections at Metrowerks who can get the license
fixed on the Open Powerplant archive?

IANAL so I'm not sure if it is safe to take something that
1) has been created by current employees of the company

2) states on the home page
http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-powerplant/ "This framework has
been released to open source by Freescale"

3) has a link on that home page to the BSD License and says it is
released under that license
http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php?form_cat=187

but
4) still has the old restrictive license in the archive.

It could be argued that there was enough intent established by the
public discussions (over months) and the creation of this website to
make the included license text in the archive irrelevant.

Do others feel this is safe?

Signature

Andy Dent BSc  MACS
OOFILE - Cross-Platform Database, Reports, Graphs, GUI in C++
PP2MFC - PowerPlant->MFC portability
http://www.oofile.com.au/

Steven Fisher - 24 Jan 2006 16:57 GMT
> Do others feel this is safe?

Why not ask the sourceforge folks? I'm sure they've seen exactly this
situation played out many times before.

Signature

Steven Fisher; sdfisher@spamcop.net

Eric Albert - 24 Jan 2006 18:35 GMT
> Is anybody left with connections at Metrowerks who can get the license
> fixed on the Open Powerplant archive?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Do others feel this is safe?

I don't feel this is safe, and I've already mentioned it to various MW
folks.  The response was that they're working on it.

-Eric

Signature

Eric Albert         ejalbert@cs.stanford.edu
http://outofcheese.org/

Sean McBride - 26 Jan 2006 01:04 GMT
> It could be argued that there was enough intent established by the
> public discussions (over months) and the creation of this website to
> make the included license text in the archive irrelevant.

I agree.  No doubt it just hasn't been gotten around to yet.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.