>> Someone stole my mac laptop last-week. )-:
>> Is there any why of tracking or seeing where my laptop is, if the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> No, becasue that serial number isn't ordinarily transmitted by the OS or
> any other Mac software.
> >> Someone stole my mac laptop last-week. )-:
> >> Is there any why of tracking or seeing where my laptop is, if the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> but I am not sure if that's correct.)
> They tout this as "LoJack for Laptops".
There's also MacPhoneHome (which I couldn't get to work), and Lapcop and
Undercover (which replaces Lapcop).
> But if I were thief, I wouldn't be booting my stolen machine
> on the network. I'd be wiping the drive, after looking it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> (In other words, this product amounts to deliberately
> installing a network back-door rootkit on your laptop!)
What precisely is meant by a "rootkit"? After all, there's a lot going
on that is invisible in everyday use.
> I think on the PC/Windows something is installed in the BIOS.
> On the Mac, I am not sure if it messes with the firmware, because
> on my Tiger Powerbook I see it running at least partly through the
> OS interfaces. I see RPC activity that I suspect is Computrace,
> and sometimes a Computrace component runs which Lil' Snitch detects.
The ones I know about don't affect the firmware. An admin user can find
out that the program is running and then delete it. But if you don't
know it's there then it can be difficult to discover that it exists.
Wiping the drive can be made difficult by setting an Open Firmware
password, though there are ways round that.
I suspect most thieves (and their clients) aren't sufficiently
experienced in computers to work this out if they have a machine that is
working for them.

Signature
Send e-mail to the Reply-To address;
mail to the From address is never read
Gnarlodious - 10 Feb 2006 17:13 GMT
Entity Daniel Cohen spoke thus:
> Wiping the drive can be made difficult by setting an Open Firmware
> password, though there are ways round that.
Speaking of Open Firmware, you can improve your chances of retrieving a
stolen Mac by setting the Open Firmware " oem-banner" variable to display a
message to would-be hackers.
To do this, first ensure that Open Firmware is unlocked. If you keep it
locked then relock it after setting the message.
Say this in Terminal to enable display of the banner text:
sudo nvram oem-banner?=true
Now set the banner variable:
udo nvram oem-banner="This Mac belongs to Gnarlodious:
http://Gnarlodious.com/ 505/570-****"
Now, anyone who is computer savvy enough to boot into Open Firmware has no
excuse to steal your Mac.
-- Gnarlie
Daniel Cohen - 11 Feb 2006 23:16 GMT
> Now set the banner variable:
> udo nvram oem-banner="This Mac belongs to Gnarlodious:
> http://Gnarlodious.com/ 505/570-****"
I think this is worth doing.
In the bit in double quotes, how does one get the new line?

Signature
Send e-mail to the Reply-To address;
mail to the From address is never read
Christopher C. Stacy - 11 Feb 2006 05:59 GMT
> What precisely is meant by a "rootkit"? After all, there's a lot
> going on that is invisible in everyday use.
A secret remote backdoor, unknown to the user, that surreptitously
makes network connections to a server, from which it downloads
arbitrary commands that will run with super-user (uid=0) privileges;
specifically, commands that will log your keystrokes to the remote
server, wipe your hard drive, and probably a few other functions the
details of which I do not know.
Also, most things are not "invisible" - you can see them running by
doing a "ps" command or using the Activity Monitor. The program
that I am referring to exploits holes in the system in order
to hide its existance and operation. You can't see it.
It's fairly well hidden on disk, too: I don't think it shows
up if you look at the Unix "rc" types of files, nor in the
various Apple launchd configuration files and so forth.
Daniel Cohen - 11 Feb 2006 12:19 GMT
> > What precisely is meant by a "rootkit"? After all, there's a lot
> > going on that is invisible in everyday use.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> up if you look at the Unix "rc" types of files, nor in the
> various Apple launchd configuration files and so forth.
Hmm, but you were originally referring to Lojack, of which you said
"this product amounts to deliberately
installing a network back-door rootkit on your laptop!".
That would be a program that is known to the user (at least to the
legitimate user), and, provided you trust the firm, again the commands
it carries out are not "arbitrary".
I think my feeling was that something the owner of the machine
deliberately instals could not be called a rootkit Contrast this with
the recent Sony attempt at copy protection, which was a rootkit.
Interesting that Lojack doesn't show up in Activity Monitor, etc.

Signature
Send e-mail to the Reply-To address;
mail to the From address is never read