> > I'm debating whether to get a 1.33 or 1.5. Does anyone know if there
> > much difference in performance?? let me know ASAP. thank you
> > > I'm debating whether to get a 1.33 or 1.5. Does anyone know if there
> > > much difference in performance?? let me know ASAP. thank you
>
> the speed difference is negligible
> the 1.5 has 256k more RAM on the motherboard
It comes with 256MB on the motherboard, just like the 1.33GHz did. The
difference is that the base configuration is 512MB instead of the older
256MB base memory. Both max out at 1.25GB memory.
512MB is OK, but more is better, and upgrading either to 1.25GB memory
is going to run about the same.
> also a faster DVD burner
> thats about it
> if it is just $150 difference, judge for yourself whether it is worth it
Roman Pearce - 20 Dec 2005 01:53 GMT
You can also look at it this way. For about the same cost you can
choose between 1.33 Ghz w/ 1gb of ram, and 1.5ghz with 512 mb.
Personally, I'd take the extra ram. Both computers are going to be
equally slow in a year or two, and over time the amount of ram becomes
the most significant factor in determining how useful a computer is. A
500mhz iBook with 640mb of ram (a generous amount at the time) can
still run the latest versions of OSX and iLife. A 600mhz iBook with
128mb (the default configuration at the time) can't.