Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Portable Macs / December 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

12'' Powerbook 1.33ghz Vs. 1.5ghz

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jona16@gmail.com - 16 Dec 2005 00:59 GMT
I'm debating whether to get a 1.33 or 1.5. Does anyone know if there
much difference in performance?? let me know ASAP. thank you
Roman Pearce - 17 Dec 2005 09:45 GMT
Probably about 12% :)
Fred McKenzie - 17 Dec 2005 18:03 GMT
> I'm debating whether to get a 1.33 or 1.5. Does anyone know if there
> much difference in performance?? let me know ASAP. thank you

Jona-

If there was no other difference, a program operation that took 15 seconds
on the slower machine might take 13.3 seconds on the faster one.  Do you
consider that significant?  How about 15 minutes vs 13.3 minutes?

Look for other differences to compare.  Does the newer one allow a larger
RAM maximum size?  Is the bus faster?  Is the hard driver larger?  Is the
hard drive faster?  Does the newer one have Airport and Bluetooth
included?

If cost is more important than any of these, perhaps you would be
satisfied with an iBook.  Otherwise go for the newest and fastest
available, and max-out the RAM.

Fred
whaddayawant - 19 Dec 2005 15:38 GMT
> > I'm debating whether to get a 1.33 or 1.5. Does anyone know if there
> > much difference in performance?? let me know ASAP. thank you

the speed difference is negligible
the 1.5 has 256k more RAM on the motherboard
also a faster DVD burner
thats about it
if it is just $150 difference, judge for yourself whether it is worth it
Steve Hix - 19 Dec 2005 19:40 GMT
> > > I'm debating whether to get a 1.33 or 1.5. Does anyone know if there
> > > much difference in performance?? let me know ASAP. thank you
>
> the speed difference is negligible
> the 1.5 has 256k more RAM on the motherboard

It comes with 256MB on the motherboard, just like the 1.33GHz did. The
difference is that the base configuration is 512MB instead of the older
256MB base memory. Both max out at 1.25GB memory.

512MB is OK, but more is better, and upgrading either to 1.25GB memory
is going to run about the same.

> also a faster DVD burner
> thats about it
> if it is just $150 difference, judge for yourself whether it is worth it
Roman Pearce - 20 Dec 2005 01:53 GMT
You can also look at it this way.  For about the same cost you can
choose between 1.33 Ghz w/ 1gb of ram, and 1.5ghz with 512 mb.
Personally, I'd take the extra ram.  Both computers are going to be
equally slow in a year or two, and over time the amount of ram becomes
the most significant factor in determining how useful a computer is.  A
500mhz iBook with 640mb of ram (a generous amount at the time) can
still run the latest versions of OSX and iLife.  A 600mhz iBook with
128mb (the default configuration at the time) can't.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.