> Not sure if mine is one of the "troubled" G3 PowerBooks but it runs
> fine on all versions of Mac OSX up to 10.3.9. It is the 400 Mhz version
> and has 192 meg of RAM and seems to run all the applications that I ask
> it to.
It is not one of the "troubled" ones then. Mine has never been able to
run any version of OSX smoothly.
> 10.4.x onwards needs at least the next version of the PowerBook, the
> firewire enabled Pismo.
What makes you believe Tiger needs a Pismo ?
I think that's the Apple party line but there are several reports of
people running it successfully on a Lombard.
--
JohnB
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy - 22 Nov 2005 12:38 GMT
> > Not sure if mine is one of the "troubled" G3 PowerBooks but it runs
> > fine on all versions of Mac OSX up to 10.3.9. It is the 400 Mhz version
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I think that's the Apple party line but there are several reports of
> people running it successfully on a Lombard.
Isn't there a problem with _installing_ Tiger on a Lombard. My Lombard
won't recognise the installation disk but runs 10.3 fine. Apparently
there is a workaround which involves making a copy of the original disk,
but I haven't bothered to try it...

Signature
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
JohnB - 22 Nov 2005 22:58 GMT
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h
offy wrote:
> Isn't there a problem with _installing_ Tiger on a Lombard. My Lombard
> won't recognise the installation disk but runs 10.3 fine. Apparently
> there is a workaround which involves making a copy of the original disk,
> but I haven't bothered to try it...
"The duchy of bessie's of the barn" - LOL !!
My Lombard had every problem possible with every version of OSX.
Hanging during install. Loaded and then hanging on boot up Loading and
running for a day or two then kernel panicking every 5 mins. Having to
take the HD out to install in a firewire case. Then not booting .....
and on and on it goes.
Not tried Tiger yet but may give it a go if I have a wet sunday
afternoon to amuse myself.
--
JohnB
Hugh Chaloner - 22 Nov 2005 23:11 GMT
> there are several reports of
> people running it successfully on a Lombard.
I'm successfully running 10.4 on a Lombard 333 MHz. As I've said before
- she ain't no thoroughbred but she still works.
Extracted the drive, put it a firewire enclosure, hooked up a cutting
edge 2002 TiBook (!), installed 10.4 from there onto the FW enclosure,
took it back out and slapped it back in the Lom. Takes a while but it
works.

Signature
http://www.intercuts.com/blog/
JohnB - 22 Nov 2005 23:39 GMT
>>there are several reports of
>>people running it successfully on a Lombard.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> took it back out and slapped it back in the Lom. Takes a while but it
> works.
Hugh - did the Lombard run earlier versions of X ok ? I have done what
you describe for mine with Panther/Jaguar and it never ran smoothly.
Cheers
--
JohnB
Hugh Chaloner - 23 Nov 2005 13:49 GMT
> Hugh - did the Lombard run earlier versions of X ok ? I have done what
> you describe for mine with Panther/Jaguar and it never ran smoothly.
>
> Cheers
Yes.
There's a way of telling if your cpu is X-friendly - I think it's done
via serial number I think - if you have a look on
<http://www.lowendmac.com/pb2/lombard.shtml>, one of their links ponts
the way - sorry I can't be more specific. That lowendmac also suggests
XpostFacto, although I never needed to use it.

Signature
http://www.intercuts.com/blog/