Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Portable Macs / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How long do iBooks last?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James Taylor - 22 Sep 2005 15:44 GMT
I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
I'm planning to move everything I do onto an Apple 12" iBook.
This will be my first time as a Mac user and I feel a little
nervous. In particular I want to be sure that the iBook and
MacOS X are up to the job and won't fail me in some catastrophic
way; perhaps due to hardware failure, file corruption, viruses, etc.

As I will be using it solidly all day every day and often
late into the night. I don't expect ever to turn it off,
unless there is a power cut, or I pack it away to travel
with it. I will be using the keyboard fairly heavily. I will
be on the Net constantly via 802.11g. The iBook won't leave
my house very often or get much in the way of physical knocks.
I intend to upgrade the RAM and hard disc to 1.5Gb and 100Gb
respectively. I shall be running the Macromedia Suite, BBEdit,
Affrus, and as many different browsers as I can lay my hands on.

How long can I expect the following components to last:

   Keyboard
   Trackpad
   Battery
   Hard disc
   Screen
   Filesystem integrity
   Any other weaknesses?

Am I asking too much of a small laptop, or is the Apple
hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

Signature

James Taylor, London, UK                              PGP key: 3FBE1BF9
To protect against spam, the address in the "From:" header is not valid.
In any case, you should reply to the group so that everyone can benefit.
If you must send me a private email, use james at oakseed demon co uk.

SteveH - 22 Sep 2005 15:51 GMT
> How long can I expect the following components to last:
>
>     Keyboard

About 2 months before the letters start peeling off the keys.
Signature

Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 2.0 TSpark Lusso - Passat 1.8 Turbo SE -  COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Luke Bosman - 22 Sep 2005 19:51 GMT
> > How long can I expect the following components to last:
> >
> >     Keyboard
>
> About 2 months before the letters start peeling off the keys.

Really? This iBook is now nearly two years old and still has all its
letters. It's a G3, did the keyboard change with the G4?

Luke

Signature

Lots of planets have a north.

SteveH - 22 Sep 2005 19:59 GMT
> > > How long can I expect the following components to last:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Really? This iBook is now nearly two years old and still has all its
> letters. It's a G3, did the keyboard change with the G4?

I've always had problems with iBook keyboards - my Tonka has worn keys,
too.

Signature

Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 2.0 TSpark Lusso - Passat 1.8 Turbo SE -  COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Peter Ceresole - 22 Sep 2005 23:37 GMT
> I've always had problems with iBook keyboards - my Tonka has worn keys,
> too.

The keyboard on Anne's Tonka (prevously mine- about 5 years old, pretty
continuously used) does show some signs of use; the 'T' has lost most of
its top bar. But apart from that, it's almost as new.

I think it depends on the fierceness of the typist, the state of their
fingertips and nails. But some of the later iBooks do seem to have had
keycaps labelled in vanishing ink.
Signature

Peter

Bob Harris - 23 Sep 2005 02:25 GMT
In article
<1h3b1o2.btgbq1whvhkoN%southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.
com>,
southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.com (Luke Bosman)
wrote:

> > > How long can I expect the following components to last:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Luke

My wife has 3+ year old 12" iBook G3/800 that still have all its
key letters, and no signs of wearing off.

                                       Bob Harris
Tim Auton - 22 Sep 2005 20:23 GMT
>> How long can I expect the following components to last:
>>
>>     Keyboard
>
>About 2 months before the letters start peeling off the keys.

Mine still looks pristine after 11 months. It gets a couple of hours
use a day on average, though I admit my most keyboard-intensive
activities are done on a desktop machine.

Tim
Signature

You are being watched. This gives you power.

Bob Harris - 23 Sep 2005 02:13 GMT
> >> How long can I expect the following components to last:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Tim

I've had my 14" iBook G4 for almost 2 years, and the keyboard
unchanged.  All the letters are there.  Now wear, no pealing,
nothing, but some dirty from my fingers, and not much of that.

I use my iBook every night, and I'm often typing long replies to
these newsgroups on it.  I'm a touch typist and I can type fairly
fast.

                                       Bob Harris
Stuart Bell - 23 Sep 2005 07:23 GMT
> > How long can I expect the following components to last:
> >
> >     Keyboard
>
> About 2 months before the letters start peeling off the keys.

Depends on the chemical structure of your sweat. I've had three iBokos,
used them intensively, and no sign of peeling characters.

Stuart

Signature

Try stuartsmacs at dsl dot pipex dot com to email me.  

Sak Wathanasin - 23 Sep 2005 09:49 GMT
In article
<1h3axop.13ndw1b1lerj75N%spamfritterspam@spamfritterspam.com>,

> Depends on the chemical structure of your sweat. I've had three iBokos,
> used them intensively, and no sign of peeling characters.

I got mine in July 2001 and all lettering on the keys are still there. I
don't use it as much as the OP intends to though. If I were, I'd invest
in a keyboard or screen or both.

Signature

Sak Wathanasin
Network Analysis Limited
http://www.network-analysis.ltd.uk

Jon B - 22 Sep 2005 16:46 GMT
> I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

The older G3s had a reputation for dodgy logic boards. Fingers crossed
they seem to have cured this on the G4s [1]. We've got probably a dozen
G4 iBooks now, oldest ones getting on for 2yrs old. So far the only
fault on any is a modem in one [2].

Keyboards have a reputation for wearing out the lettering on the keys
with certain typists, especially the females, mines fine but then 80% of
the time I use the iBook on a stand and external keyboard and mouse.
Trackpad, never ever had a problem with one. Battery if used on mains
most of the time it should last some time. Drain the battery regularly
and you won't get so much life.

HDs again out of all the G3 and G4 iBooks we've got I've had one failure
in 4yrs. New ones now come with a sudden motion sensor to park the heads
in case of any sudden movement.

Screens never had a problem unless you drop tea down the front, then
that blows the inverter. The inverter lead route on some early ones was
prone to breaking, a £35 part, a bitch to fit, but again I've only ever
done two, on the older G3s.

Filesystem integrity, pretty damned good, most of ours get installed,
sent out to the user and I never see them again for a few years. They
just run and run.

Any other weeknesses? Concrete, tea, they are a bitch to upgrade, unlike
a lot of pc laptops covered in various flaps for the HD and CD drive you
have to dissemble the iBook to get at them. If the off the shelf model
doesn't come with the HD you want etc, upgrade it at purchase time it
isn't too badly priced. Buy ram from crucial etc though as much cheaper
than Apple and that is easy to fit, just flip over keyboard, remove
airport card and cover, install ram, re-fit everything. Two minute job.

This post comes from a Jan 04 iBook 14", HD upgraded at time of purchase
(plus BT & Airport which are now standard). Used 5 days a week 9-5or6,
most nights for an hour or two here and there, most weekends, it never
gets turned off, just put sleep as finish work, slung in bag, into car
footwell, home, out carry on, in car work or other end of country
asleep, drag out, do some work, back away. I did have a sticky key (only
one I've seen ever) on it after 1yr, Apple sent me a free keyboard,
carry on working. Current uptime 9.5 days, my CEOs had 2months plus
uptime out of his. Only real fault in my eyes, it isn't a 15" Powerbook
as thats got a gorgeous screen.

[1] Though we've not had that many of the G3s fail of all ours.
[2] £45 + vat + fitting which as I'm comfortable stripping them down
(not that easy) I did myself.
Signature

Jon B
real email to usenet at jonbradbury dot com

Phil Earnhardt - 22 Sep 2005 17:56 GMT
>Keyboards have a reputation for wearing out the lettering on the keys
>with certain typists, especially the females, mines fine but then 80% of
>the time I use the iBook on a stand and external keyboard and mouse.
>Trackpad, never ever had a problem with one. Battery if used on mains
>most of the time it should last some time. Drain the battery regularly
>and you won't get so much life.

FWIW, I'm a big fan of the iSkin ProTouch keyboard cover and use one
on my iBook. The feel is acceptable to me as long as I keep my
fingernails are reasonably short. And it gives one some protection
from contamination.

The main downside is that oils from the iSkin cover will get on the
display. The marware pad will protect the display from that.

--phil

>HDs again out of all the G3 and G4 iBooks we've got I've had one failure
>in 4yrs. New ones now come with a sudden motion sensor to park the heads
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>[2] £45 + vat + fitting which as I'm comfortable stripping them down
>(not that easy) I did myself.
Bonge Boo! - 22 Sep 2005 16:54 GMT
On 22/9/05 15:44, in article ant2214311cbfNdQ@riscpc.jtnet, "James Taylor"
<spam-block-@-SEE-MY-SIG.com> wrote:

> How long can I expect the following components to last:
>
>   Keyboard

Depends how you type; other problem is the printing on the keys wears off.
The Powerbook keyboards are infinitely better.

>   Trackpad

They work.

>   Battery

Depends on how much use of the mains you do. My experience is they last 2-3
year before conking. I spend a lot of time on the battery.

>   Hard disc

Your guess is as good as any. They die. Some more than others and you find
out the duffers after they die, not when you buy.

>   Screen

Don't break it, it'll last 5+ years.

>   Filesystem integrity

Jounaled disk, pretty reliable.

>   Any other weaknesses?

Historically the Powerbooks have had better reliability than the iBooks,
which did not shine.

> Am I asking too much of a small laptop, or is the Apple
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

Personally if I was you I'd get the Powerbook; simply because of the
keyboard. If you code, you'll want a comfy one. Its a beauty. There are
other reasons, but I won't bore you. Suffice to say, if you have the extra
cash, you won't regret it.
Tim Streater - 22 Sep 2005 17:22 GMT
> I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>     Filesystem integrity
>     Any other weaknesses?

Had mine 3 years now no problems except for battery whose life was about
1 yr. Just replaced with a new one which seems much better than the
original.

> Am I asking too much of a small laptop, or is the Apple
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

I also upgraded the memory to 384 this took about 5 mins. This is the
only time I have opened the case.

Apart from wishing it had a G4 very happy with it.

-- tim
Chris Brown - 22 Sep 2005 17:30 GMT
Mine is 4 years old. It looks a bit battered and worn, and had its logic
board replaced by Apple (there was a design fault and a product recall -
it's fixed now). The screen is starting to flicker a bit, but a new
backlight cable should fix that. It needs a new battery - currently gives me
less than 1 hour on a full charge, but the machine is still basically solid.

AIUI, the life expectency of a laptop in general is 2 years, so I reckon I'm
not doing too badly.
Bonge Boo! - 22 Sep 2005 17:59 GMT
On 22/9/05 17:30, in article 6qva03-sd8.ln1@narcissus.dyndns.org, "Chris
Brown" <cpbrown@ntlworld.no_uce_please.com> wrote:

> AIUI, the life expectency of a laptop in general is 2 years, so I reckon I'm
> not doing too badly.

Speak for yourself I would expect 5 years minimum...
Chris Ridd - 22 Sep 2005 18:19 GMT
On 22/9/05 5:59, in article BF58A179.AF582%bingbong@spamcop.net, "Bonge
Boo!" <bingbong@spamcop.net> wrote:

> On 22/9/05 17:30, in article 6qva03-sd8.ln1@narcissus.dyndns.org, "Chris
> Brown" <cpbrown@ntlworld.no_uce_please.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Speak for yourself I would expect 5 years minimum...

I'd put it at 3 years instead of 2, but 5 years is quite unreasonable. I
suppose it depends on what you're expecting to do with the machine towards
the end of that time, and how soon after your purchase you expect
significantly faster machines (ones worth upgrading to) to arrive.

But mainly I'd say 5 years is unreasonable because laptops are moved around
a lot and are much more likely to sustain physical damage.

I also wouldn't expect PowerPC-based machines to have a 5 year lifespan
given the arrival of Intel boxes next year.

Cheers,

Chris
Bonge Boo! - 22 Sep 2005 19:06 GMT
On 22/9/05 18:19, in article BF58A61B.FEF2F%chrisridd@mac.com, "Chris Ridd"
<chrisridd@mac.com> wrote:

>>> AIUI, the life expectency of a laptop in general is 2 years, so I reckon I'm
>>> not doing too badly.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> But mainly I'd say 5 years is unreasonable because laptops are moved around
> a lot and are much more likely to sustain physical damage.

<shrug> You know what I do for a living. My laptop leaves the house almost
every day. I have pristine Powerbook 100 (over 10 years old), Powerbook
3400C (over 6 years old), Powerbook G4/550 (about 4 years old). All fine,
apart from the batteries. Love it, it will love you. The only damage my
Ti1000 has was self-inflicted through carelessness. Its the only time I
think I've ever damaged on of my computers and I'm still pissed off with
myself 12 months later.</shrug>
Gwynne Harper - 24 Sep 2005 20:18 GMT
> My laptop leaves the house almost
> every day. I have pristine Powerbook 100 (over 10 years old), Powerbook
> 3400C (over 6 years old), Powerbook G4/550 (about 4 years old). All fine,
> apart from the batteries.

My PB3400 is likewise in excellent condition and stands up to daily use
after 7yr frequent use and carriage to very unlikely places.

Gwynne
Signature

My real email is net, not line.

Tom Harrington - 22 Sep 2005 19:30 GMT
> I also wouldn't expect PowerPC-based machines to have a 5 year lifespan
> given the arrival of Intel boxes next year.

Right, because on the day that the Intel Macs are released, all PowerPC
Macs will spontaneously burst into flames.

Signature

Tom "Tom" Harrington
Macaroni, Automated System Maintenance for Mac OS X.
Version 2.0:  Delocalize, Repair Permissions, lots more.
See http://www.atomicbird.com/

Chris Ridd - 22 Sep 2005 19:35 GMT
On 22/9/05 7:30, in article tph-D78DEA.12301022092005@localhost, "Tom
Harrington" <tph@pcisys.no.spam.dammit.net> wrote:

>> I also wouldn't expect PowerPC-based machines to have a 5 year lifespan
>> given the arrival of Intel boxes next year.
>
> Right, because on the day that the Intel Macs are released, all PowerPC
> Macs will spontaneously burst into flames.

You heard that too eh?

No of course they won't. But you can count on there being Intel-only
software coming out.

Cheers,

Chris
Steve Hix - 23 Sep 2005 01:19 GMT
> On 22/9/05 7:30, in article tph-D78DEA.12301022092005@localhost, "Tom
> Harrington" <tph@pcisys.no.spam.dammit.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> No of course they won't. But you can count on there being Intel-only
> software coming out.

But not a lot of it right the start.

It's too easy to write universal executables with the new Xcode tools,
and by far the majority of potential customers will still be running
PowerPC for a year or three after the first intel Macs hit the market.
Chris Ridd - 23 Sep 2005 07:36 GMT
On 23/9/05 1:19, in article
sehix-6A4549.17192522092005@news.isp.giganews.com, "Steve Hix"
<sehix@NOSPAMspeakeasy.netINVALID> wrote:

> It's too easy to write universal executables with the new Xcode tools,
> and by far the majority of potential customers will still be running
> PowerPC for a year or three after the first intel Macs hit the market.

Right, but *5* years?

Cheers,

Chris
Gregory Weston - 23 Sep 2005 13:04 GMT
> On 23/9/05 1:19, in article
> sehix-6A4549.17192522092005@news.isp.giganews.com, "Steve Hix"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Right, but *5* years?

From right now? Yeah, I'd say 5 years would be about when I'd expect
serious developers to begin scaling back their PowerPC support in new
releases.

We've got, what, maybe 8-9 months until the _first_ x86 Mac hits the
streets. Maybe a year after that for the x86 to supplant the PowerPC
across the shipping product line. So in 5 years, the last of the
PowerPCs will be a tad over 3 years old. Most developers aren't in a
position to demand that their users cycle out otherwise functional
machines that are only 3 years old and unless they've got real lock-in
on their product they'd be fools to gratuitously alienate the majority
of their prospective market.

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

Steve Hix - 24 Sep 2005 01:16 GMT
> On 23/9/05 1:19, in article
> sehix-6A4549.17192522092005@news.isp.giganews.com, "Steve Hix"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Right, but *5* years?

There are still people running pre-OS X capable Macs on a daily basis,
(and even a couple of developers still doing classic MacOS applications).

I'll bet that support for PPC Macs will continue, not necessarily from
Apple, for longer than support for classic MacOS users; it's just too
easy to do if you're already making Xcode applications for the intel
Macs. It will fade away as customers willing to pay for it dwindle away.

Then again, I know people who build steam launches and stationary
engines, not to mention flintlock rifles.
Chris Ridd - 24 Sep 2005 08:41 GMT
On 24/9/05 1:16, in article
sehix-ABEF1C.17160623092005@news.isp.giganews.com, "Steve Hix"
<sehix@NOSPAMspeakeasy.netINVALID> wrote:

> Then again, I know people who build steam launches and stationary
> engines, not to mention flintlock rifles.

Out of old Macs? Cool!

Cheers,

Chris
RichardK - 23 Sep 2005 17:10 GMT
> On 22/9/05 7:30, in article tph-D78DEA.12301022092005@localhost, "Tom
> Harrington" <tph@pcisys.no.spam.dammit.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> No of course they won't. But you can count on there being Intel-only
> software coming out.

Only if the developers want to commit financial suicide. The whole point
of the 'dual compiler' business is to encourage them to support the new
ones as well, rather than just developing for the existing market ;)

Richard

Signature

RichardK - 1980s in a can. http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/music/
Retro computing - http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/retrotech/
Cars - 2004 Beetle Cabrio, 1989 Supra 3.0i, 1990 Sera, 1989 Volvo 740
MidiGuitar, AU/X. Apple 77-04. See links. Email - upgrade to 128 ;)

Chris Ridd - 23 Sep 2005 17:25 GMT
On 23/9/05 5:10, in article 3pino6FamknnU2@individual.net, "RichardK"
<atari@NOSPAMbtconnect.com> wrote:

>> On 22/9/05 7:30, in article tph-D78DEA.12301022092005@localhost, "Tom
>> Harrington" <tph@pcisys.no.spam.dammit.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> of the 'dual compiler' business is to encourage them to support the new
> ones as well, rather than just developing for the existing market ;)

I'm sure there will be Intel-only apps early on, rightly or wrongly.
Consider new developers on the platform who don't want the overhead of
testing two architectures, or things which will only work reasonably on the
x86 architecture (emulators, etc). They'll happen.

Cheers,

Chris
Roger Merriman - 23 Sep 2005 21:14 GMT
> On 23/9/05 5:10, in article 3pino6FamknnU2@individual.net, "RichardK"
> <atari@NOSPAMbtconnect.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Chris

or some cross platform projects such as some open soarce programs that
may not wish to use xcode.... which would make, a dual binary more
difficult.

i suspect that programs such as firefox don't use xcode?

Roger
Chris Ridd - 23 Sep 2005 22:00 GMT
On 23/9/05 9:14, in article 1h3d1a5.1aaq0xy1j4yiegN%NEWS@wodger.demon.co.uk,

> or some cross platform projects such as some open soarce programs that
> may not wish to use xcode.... which would make, a dual binary more
> difficult.

Xcode just drives the compiler and linker in particular ways; it would be
possible to do the same thing without using Xcode.

> i suspect that programs such as firefox don't use xcode?

They'll use make, which calls the compiler and linker. However the way they
typically configure (sic) themselves assumes they're building for one
architecture and that isn't true...

Several people have discovered this on the Intel developer boxes. I guess
some kind of solution will be worked out before real Intel boxes come out.
But since a lot of "open source" folks are zealots who consider anything
non-Linux as "broken", it might not be so easy.

Cheers,

Chris
Woody - 23 Sep 2005 22:47 GMT
> On 23/9/05 9:14, in article 1h3d1a5.1aaq0xy1j4yiegN%NEWS@wodger.demon.co.uk,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> But since a lot of "open source" folks are zealots who consider anything
> non-Linux as "broken", it might not be so easy.

I had never noticed a tendancy to be like that - all the open source
things that I have tried have had MaxOSX versions, with good support.

Signature

Woody

www.alienrat.com

Chris Ridd - 24 Sep 2005 08:37 GMT
On 23/9/05 10:47, in article 1h3d5x4.1agx1121ymglzuN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,

>> On 23/9/05 9:14, in article 1h3d1a5.1aaq0xy1j4yiegN%NEWS@wodger.demon.co.uk,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I had never noticed a tendancy to be like that - all the open source
> things that I have tried have had MaxOSX versions, with good support.

Maybe I found the rabid ones. Try Mono, for instance.

Cheers,

Chris
Woody - 24 Sep 2005 12:57 GMT
> On 23/9/05 10:47, in article 1h3d5x4.1agx1121ymglzuN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Maybe I found the rabid ones. Try Mono, for instance.

I had a look there the other day, but couldn't see what I needed to get
to write OSX c# programs.

Signature

Woody

www.alienrat.com

Chris Ridd - 24 Sep 2005 18:06 GMT
On 24/9/05 12:57, in article 1h3e994.1dojj7z9wc50bN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,

>> On 23/9/05 10:47, in article 1h3d5x4.1agx1121ymglzuN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I had a look there the other day, but couldn't see what I needed to get
> to write OSX c# programs.

Apart from the compiler? Any old text editor will do. There's also a couple
of IDEs (monodevelop, xdevelop), but as far as I know those still need X11.

I think some folk are trying to get Xcode support working.

Cheers,

Chris
Ian McCall - 24 Sep 2005 20:02 GMT
> On 24/9/05 12:57, in article 1h3e994.1dojj7z9wc50bN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Apart from the compiler? Any old text editor will do. There's also a couple
> of IDEs (monodevelop, xdevelop), but as far as I know those still need X11.

There is a plug-in for Eclipse too.

Cheers,
Ian
Chris Ridd - 24 Sep 2005 20:05 GMT
On 24/9/05 8:02, in article 3plm5kFb4srbU1@individual.net, "Ian McCall"
<ian@eruvia.org> wrote:

>> On 24/9/05 12:57, in article 1h3e994.1dojj7z9wc50bN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> There is a plug-in for Eclipse too.

Lovely - a Java program for writing .Net software!

How's Cocoa# nowadays?

Cheers,

Chris
Woody - 25 Sep 2005 00:20 GMT
> > On 24/9/05 12:57, in article 1h3e994.1dojj7z9wc50bN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> There is a plug-in for Eclipse too.

Eclipse.. <shudder/>

Signature

Woody

www.alienrat.com

Woody - 25 Sep 2005 00:20 GMT
> On 24/9/05 12:57, in article 1h3e994.1dojj7z9wc50bN%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Apart from the compiler? Any old text editor will do. There's also a couple
> of IDEs (monodevelop, xdevelop), but as far as I know those still need X11.

Libraries. Preferably nothing that has to use X11 if at all possible!

Signature

Woody

www.alienrat.com

Chris Ridd - 25 Sep 2005 06:17 GMT
On 25/9/05 12:20, in article 1h3f4mp.2mnf1h13fd277N%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,

>> Apart from the compiler? Any old text editor will do. There's also a couple
>> of IDEs (monodevelop, xdevelop), but as far as I know those still need X11.
>
> Libraries. Preferably nothing that has to use X11 if at all possible!

Bad luck. Mono relies on GNOME which is pretty well tied to X11. (I believe
it is "portable" in the sense that it works with Win32 *or* X11, so that
doesn't help much!)

Cheers,

Chris
Woody - 25 Sep 2005 11:08 GMT
> On 25/9/05 12:20, in article 1h3f4mp.2mnf1h13fd277N%usenet@alienrat.co.uk,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> it is "portable" in the sense that it works with Win32 *or* X11, so that
> doesn't help much!)

Oh well, that is no use then.

Signature

Woody

www.alienrat.com

Stuart Bell - 24 Sep 2005 12:03 GMT
> I also wouldn't expect PowerPC-based machines to have a 5 year lifespan
> given the arrival of Intel boxes next year.

New machines don't shorten the period of useability of old ones. Apple
arne't going to cut off their noses to spite their faces by attempting
to force an early migration to the IntelMacs.

Stuart
Signature

Try stuartsmacs at dsl dot pipex dot com to email me.  

Chris Brown - 22 Sep 2005 23:27 GMT
>On 22/9/05 17:30, in article 6qva03-sd8.ln1@narcissus.dyndns.org, "Chris
>Brown" <cpbrown@ntlworld.no_uce_please.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Speak for yourself I would expect 5 years minimum...

I'd fully expect my laptop to last longer than that, indeed, it has, but
they're mostly bought by businesses and IME they generally do indeed expect
to junk them after 2 years, compared to 3-4 years for a desktop.
Jon B - 23 Sep 2005 10:33 GMT
> >On 22/9/05 17:30, in article 6qva03-sd8.ln1@narcissus.dyndns.org, "Chris
> >Brown" <cpbrown@ntlworld.no_uce_please.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> they're mostly bought by businesses and IME they generally do indeed expect
> to junk them after 2 years, compared to 3-4 years for a desktop.

Even ours with business use are lasting four years so far, I've got a
sept 2001 iBook in my pile of stuff to do, the hinge is a bit creaky now
[1], the case is a bit scratched as you'd expect but other than that
been no problems with it, this is only the second time I've seen it
since 2001, the first time was about 2yrs ago when changed it over from
os9 to osX, going to give it another quick fettle when I get a mo and
send it on to a new user [2]

[1] They've improved the design after not very long on that
[2] Although it is now taking on a more relaxed role as a secondary
machine.
Signature

Jon B
real email to usenet at jonbradbury dot com

Chris Brown - 23 Sep 2005 11:29 GMT
>> >On 22/9/05 17:30, in article 6qva03-sd8.ln1@narcissus.dyndns.org, "Chris
>> >Brown" <cpbrown@ntlworld.no_uce_please.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Even ours with business use are lasting four years so far, I've got a
>sept 2001 iBook in my pile of stuff to do,

That's sort of my point, iBooks seem to last a lot longer than the harsh
commercial world expects laptops to last. Perhaps I should have stated this
more explicitly.
Adam - 22 Sep 2005 17:42 GMT
> I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> way; perhaps due to hardware failure, file corruption, viruses, etc.
> ...snuff snipped...

That is exactly the choice I made a few years ago when I replaced my
beloved Risc PC and PC running Linux. I bought a 700Mhz G3 iBook which
successfully replaced both and is still going strong. The battery needs
replacing but everything else has been fine.

Of course, like RISC OS, OS X can become addictive, so I now have a
Dual G4 PowerMac at home and Dual G5 PowerMac at Work! OS X really is
like what RISC OS would have looked like if some artists had got a hand
in its development. It bares an uncanny resemblance to RISC OS.
Luke Bosman - 22 Sep 2005 19:51 GMT
> > I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> > office LAN for all my programming and web development work.

> Of course, like RISC OS, OS X can become addictive, so I now have a
> Dual G4 PowerMac at home and Dual G5 PowerMac at Work! OS X really is
> like what RISC OS would have looked like if some artists had got a hand
> in its development. It bares an uncanny resemblance to RISC OS.

I wonder quite how many people here are former RISC OS users.

Luke

Signature

Lots of planets have a north.

Graeme Wall - 23 Sep 2005 09:28 GMT
> > > I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> > > office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I wonder quite how many people here are former RISC OS users.

I'm a current RISC OS user, I'm using the RiscPC for Usenet and email as well
as running ny business.  The G4 is my video edit suite.  Both machines are
networked via a 4 way router.  As you say the operating systems are very
similar in operation, just keep trying to right click on the Macmouse...

Signature

Graeme Wall

My genealogy website:  
<http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/index.html>

RichardK - 23 Sep 2005 17:11 GMT
>>>I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
>>>office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I wonder quite how many people here are former RISC OS users.

Former?

*hides pile of Archimedes machines*

Richard

Signature

RichardK - 1980s in a can. http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/music/
Retro computing - http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/retrotech/
Cars - 2004 Beetle Cabrio, 1989 Supra 3.0i, 1990 Sera, 1989 Volvo 740
MidiGuitar, AU/X. Apple 77-04. See links. Email - upgrade to 128 ;)

Luke Bosman - 23 Sep 2005 20:22 GMT
> > I wonder quite how many people here are former RISC OS users.
>
> Former?
>
> *hides pile of Archimedes machines*

Very soon after buying an iMac, the Risc PC here found itself unloved
and underused. It didn't help that, at the time, I had no means of
transferring data from the Risc PC to the iMac other than dial-up
internet.

By the time I had bought a network card for the Risc PC I had most of
the software I wanted for OS X. I still would love to see an OS X
version of Techwriter.

Cheers,
Luke
Signature

Lots of planets have a north.

Stuart Bell - 24 Sep 2005 12:03 GMT
> I wonder quite how many people here are former RISC OS users.

<raises hand>

Stuart
Signature

Try stuartsmacs at dsl dot pipex dot com to email me.  

Ian McCall - 24 Sep 2005 12:12 GMT
>> I wonder quite how many people here are former RISC OS users.
>
> <raises hand>

Pah. You and your new-fangled RISC OS nonsense. Why in my day, we had
ARTHUR and liked it. Almost.

Cheers,
Ian
Graeme Wall - 23 Sep 2005 09:23 GMT
[snip]
> Of course, like RISC OS, OS X can become addictive, so I now have a
> Dual G4 PowerMac at home and Dual G5 PowerMac at Work! OS X really is
> like what RISC OS would have looked like if some artists had got a hand
> in its development. It bares an uncanny resemblance to RISC OS.

And that's the naked truth!

Signature

Graeme Wall

My genealogy website:  
<http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/index.html>

Si - 22 Sep 2005 21:33 GMT
> I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> with it. I will be using the keyboard fairly heavily. I will
> be on the Net constantly via 802.11g. The iBook won't leave
SNIP
> Am I asking too much of a small laptop, or is the Apple
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

Our iBook is 6 months old and gets used 2 or 3 hours a day, 7 days a
week. The page down key is slightly worn but no other key shows signs
of wear. The page down key problem is my fault. I tend to rub it rather
than press it staight down. Of course new iBooks have the two-finger
scrolling trackpad so that would reduce use of the page down key!

MacOS is brilliant. No worries there. Its several years ahead of
windows. In fact its actually incredible how far ahead it is IMHO.

The iBook is reliable and robust. But what about you?! If you are using
it solidly every day then ANY laptop might not be ideal. Really you
want a full sized, quality keyboard. A very comfortable mouse and a
decent sized monitor. With a very comfy chair. Non glare lighting etc
etc...

Si
Gregory Weston - 23 Sep 2005 01:05 GMT
> In particular I want to be sure that the iBook and
> MacOS X are up to the job and won't fail me in some catastrophic
> way; perhaps due to hardware failure, file corruption, viruses, etc.

Viruses are a non-issue for the Mac and the moment, and have been for
some time. The weak component of a Macintosh in 2005 is the user.

> How long can I expect the following components to last:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

My first Apple portable was a low-end G3 PowerBook that I got rid of
after 3.5 years without a single component failure. I got rid of it
mostly because I couldn't cope with the passive LCD on a machine I was
using as regularly as I ended up doing. I replaced it in late 2001 with
an iBook. I think the most failure prone part of any notebook is the
hard drive, and that's the only thing that's had trouble on my heavily
used 4-year old iBook. I'll have no qualms about getting another when my
needs outstrip this one.

Advice: Buy it configured with the internal hard drive you want.
Replacing the hard drive on an iBook is not trivial, even with the
service manual sitting right next to you. On the other hand, do not buy
any more RAM from Apple than you have to. That's very easy and much
cheaper to add afterwards.

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

Bonge Boo! - 23 Sep 2005 09:40 GMT
On 23/9/05 01:05, in article
uce-FF117E.20052222092005@comcast.dca.giganews.com, "Gregory Weston"
<uce@splook.com> wrote:

>> In particular I want to be sure that the iBook and
>> MacOS X are up to the job and won't fail me in some catastrophic
>> way; perhaps due to hardware failure, file corruption, viruses, etc.
>
> Viruses are a non-issue for the Mac and the moment, and have been for
> some time. The weak component of a Macintosh in 2005 is the user.

So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both platforms.
Peter Ceresole - 23 Sep 2005 09:49 GMT
> > Viruses are a non-issue for the Mac and the moment, and have been for
> > some time. The weak component of a Macintosh in 2005 is the user.
>
> So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both platforms.

Sure; always true.

But in a context where there are great amounts of malware out there
looking to get at Windows machines, and effectively none looking for
Macs.

It makes a hell of a difference, as you know.
Signature

Peter

Gregory Weston - 23 Sep 2005 12:54 GMT
> On 23/9/05 01:05, in article
> uce-FF117E.20052222092005@comcast.dca.giganews.com, "Gregory Weston"
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both platforms.

Very different from Windows. The merely ignorant Mac user isn't actually
at significant risk from malware. You really have to go out of your way
to expose yourself to attack.

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

Shawn Hirn - 23 Sep 2005 17:52 GMT
> > On 23/9/05 01:05, in article
> > uce-FF117E.20052222092005@comcast.dca.giganews.com, "Gregory Weston"
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> at significant risk from malware. You really have to go out of your way
> to expose yourself to attack.

Exactly. I have a very strong Windows background. Once after I was out
of town on vacation, I returned to work to find a notice from a
colleague to install the latest Windows patch. My Windows computer was
off at the time, but my Mac was humming along while I was away.

Literally, seconds after I booted my Windows PC, it became infected with
a virus. I don't remember which virus though. I never ever read email on
my Windows PC, nor do I access any Internet services from there unless
it is absolutely necessary, yet it still got hit with a virus. The only
reason I started that PC in the first place was to install the latest
.dat file and WIndows updates!

I wouldn't trust any of my data to reside on a Windows machine. All my
data sits on Macs, and I have never had a problem with file corruption,
although my Powerbook's disk drive did die on me a few months ago after
nearly three years of heavy use and lots of travel time, including being
dropped hard two or three times.
Bonge Boo! - 23 Sep 2005 18:09 GMT
On 23/9/05 17:52, in article srhi-FF019C.12524723092005@news.giganews.com,

>>> So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both platforms.
>>
>> Very different from Windows. The merely ignorant Mac user isn't actually
>> at significant risk from malware. You really have to go out of your way
>> to expose yourself to attack.

Who said we're talking about malware? Ignorant Mac user is in danger or
deleting critical system files or data. Which is just as destructive as
getting a virus through ignorance on a PC.

> Exactly. I have a very strong Windows background. Once after I was out
> of town on vacation, I returned to work to find a notice from a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> reason I started that PC in the first place was to install the latest
> .dat file and WIndows updates!

Sounds like the you forgot a cardinal rule. Firewalls up. Be extremely
surprised if you got infected by a worm if you had one in place. Change
that; I'd be staggered.

I'm moderately PC ignorant. Its on most of the time, usually downloading all
sorts of crap from P2P. Never been infected* in over 5 years. I treat the PC
with a degree of contempt I'd never show my Mac. I can't be arsed to do any
sort of maintenance on it, apart from I run Windows and AV update. It keeps
on chugging away happily.

* I've received hundreds of viruses, but that's completely different to
being infected.
Luke Bosman - 23 Sep 2005 20:22 GMT
> On 23/9/05 17:52, in article srhi-FF019C.12524723092005@news.giganews.com,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> deleting critical system files or data. Which is just as destructive as
> getting a virus through ignorance on a PC.

I would have thought that the request for an admin password would stop
people for long enough to think. The totally ignorant should not be
allowed an admin password.

Cheers,
Luke

Signature

Lots of planets have a north.

Bonge Boo! - 23 Sep 2005 21:12 GMT
On 23/9/05 20:22, in article
1h3cz44.40yqkwgnunfpN%southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.com, "Luke
Bosman" <southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.com> wrote:

>>>>> So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both platforms.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> people for long enough to think. The totally ignorant should not be
> allowed an admin password.

Yeah right. How exactly do you stop that when someone has to own the
computer? Do we limit the sale of Macs to those who display sufficient
gumption?
Luke Bosman - 23 Sep 2005 23:34 GMT
> On 23/9/05 20:22, in article
> 1h3cz44.40yqkwgnunfpN%southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.com, "Luke
> Bosman" <southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.com> wrote:

> > I would have thought that the request for an admin password would stop
> > people for long enough to think. The totally ignorant should not be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> computer? Do we limit the sale of Macs to those who display sufficient
> gumption?

Maybe the install CDs should contain a brief IQ test. The stupid could
then find an intelligent person to install the stuff for them and set up
an admin password that they do not know.

Luke

Signature

Lots of planets have a north.

Gregory Weston - 25 Sep 2005 12:58 GMT
> On 23/9/05 20:22, in article
> 1h3cz44.40yqkwgnunfpN%southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.com, "Luke
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> computer? Do we limit the sale of Macs to those who display sufficient
> gumption?

You've missed the point: It _ASKS_FOR_A_PASSWORD_. I'd call blithely
typing in a password when you're doing something ostensibly harmless and
for which you don't typically have to type a password to be beyond
"merely ignorant."

And in my experience, such people usually can't remember their admin
password anyway and need to call someone with a clue to ask them which
scrap of paper it was on.

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

Bonge Boo! - 25 Sep 2005 17:27 GMT
On 25/9/05 12:58, in article
uce-B643E8.07583325092005@comcast.dca.giganews.com, "Gregory Weston"
<uce@splook.com> wrote:

>>>>>>> So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both
>>>>>>> platforms.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> for which you don't typically have to type a password to be beyond
> "merely ignorant."

I'm not missing the point. Despite repeatedly explaining to my customer what
the admin password is for, I regularly have cases of people breaking things
by authorising to do things they really ought not to. When I politely ask
why, the answer is always along the lines of "its my computer, I'll do as  I
like." People view the necessity to supply authentication as an annoyance,
not a protection, and treat it as such,

I promise you, if someone does release some malware for the Mac, it will
spread like wildfire amongst my customers. They have no conception of
threat, unlike my windows customers, who are paranoid to the point of
stupidity.
Gregory Weston - 26 Sep 2005 02:13 GMT
> > You've missed the point: It _ASKS_FOR_A_PASSWORD_. I'd call blithely
> > typing in a password when you're doing something ostensibly harmless and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> why, the answer is always along the lines of "its my computer, I'll do as  I
> like."

And they'll then pay to have it fixed. But I stand by my comment: What
you have described is not simple ignorance. It's willful stupidity.

G

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

zoara - 26 Sep 2005 23:49 GMT
> > On 23/9/05 20:22, in article
> > 1h3cz44.40yqkwgnunfpN%southend.unitedfc.5.lukebosman@spamgourmet.com, "Luke
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> for which you don't typically have to type a password to be beyond
> "merely ignorant."

How do they know whether what they are doing "typically requires a
password"? They don't, because they're ignorant. "This computer keeps
bloody asking for passwords!"

Most people are far, far less comfortable with computers than you, or I,
or anyone else reading this.
 
> And in my experience, such people usually can't remember their admin
> password anyway and need to call someone with a clue to ask them which
> scrap of paper it was on.

This is true.

       -z-

Signature

6th June 2005: Hell freezes over.
2nd August 2005: Hell freezes over *again*.

Gregory Weston - 27 Sep 2005 11:48 GMT
> How do they know whether what they are doing "typically requires a
> password"? They don't, because they're ignorant.

People delete files fairly often, and the system doesn't ask for a
password. If suddenly the attempt to delete something asks for a
password, it _should_ slow you down enough to wonder what's different.

> "This computer keeps bloody asking for passwords!"

But it doesn't. Outside of a majority of installer packages - which most
software doesn't use - seeing authentication requests is really not a
particularly common thing.

G

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

Roger Merriman - 23 Sep 2005 21:14 GMT
> On 23/9/05 17:52, in article srhi-FF019C.12524723092005@news.giganews.com,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> getting a virus through ignorance on a PC.
>  
yes indeed i had to help a friend or two before now who managed to
remove, sofware off there computer by accendently deleating it, best was
one mate who dragged ms office, which he kept on the desktop into the
trash....

snips

Roger
Gregory Weston - 25 Sep 2005 12:55 GMT
> On 23/9/05 17:52, in article srhi-FF019C.12524723092005@news.giganews.com,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Who said we're talking about malware?

Um. That was the context in which your comment was made. Here; I'll
remind you:

|| Viruses are a non-issue for the Mac and the moment, and have been for
|| some time. The weak component of a Macintosh in 2005 is the user.
| So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both
| platforms.

> Ignorant Mac user is in danger or deleting critical system files or data.

Actually, that's false. As with malware, the merely ignorant Mac user
isn't at much risk. They'd have to go out of their way to delete
critical system files or data.

G

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

Bonge Boo! - 25 Sep 2005 17:23 GMT
On 25/9/05 12:55, in article
uce-6863D3.07552325092005@comcast.dca.giganews.com, "Gregory Weston"
<uce@splook.com> wrote:

>>>>> So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both platforms.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> | So no different to Windows then? Ignorant user = danger on both
> | platforms.

Relevant section: "The weak component of a Macintosh in 2005 is the user."

No mention of malware?

>> Ignorant Mac user is in danger or deleting critical system files or data.
>
> Actually, that's false. As with malware, the merely ignorant Mac user
> isn't at much risk. They'd have to go out of their way to delete
> critical system files or data.

I strongly encourage you to put the contents of your Home folder in the
trash and empty it. It's fun!
Gregory Weston - 26 Sep 2005 02:17 GMT
> On 25/9/05 12:55, in article
> uce-6863D3.07552325092005@comcast.dca.giganews.com, "Gregory Weston"
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> No mention of malware?

"Viruses?" First line? First word? See it? Right there?
Lookoutlookoutit'sgonnagetyou.

The OP asked about viruses, specifically. I responded about viruses,
specifically. You claimed that Mac users could hurt themselves in other
ways and then wondered why I mentioned malware (of which viruses are a
subcategory) in the followup. You understand my confusion over your
confusion now, yes?

> >> Ignorant Mac user is in danger or deleting critical system files or data.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I strongly encourage you to put the contents of your Home folder in the
> trash and empty it. It's fun!

I don't have critical system files in my home folder. I don't think I
know anyone who does.

Signature

Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.

Bill - 23 Sep 2005 04:25 GMT
> I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

I am typing this on an iBook G4 that I bought new in February 2004. It
is my main machine. I use it every day, many hours a day. I take it with
me everywhere I go, around the town, across the country, and on foreign
travel. Works great. For a while the track pad seemed a little erratic,
but not so bad I could not live with it, and that problem cured itself.
I use it for database design and development, data entry, word
processing, photos, music, email, web browsing, etc. The database work
involves a lot of continuous typing, day after day month after month. I
almost never turn the machine off. I put it to sleep to move it, then
wake it up again when I get ready to use it.

I always use the built-in keyboard and screen. The keyboard and screen
are now a little dusty but not so you'd notice it. The letters on the
keyboard look like new, and the display is still beautiful.

I get several hours of battery life, but of course the batteries do
ultimately fail; 3-4 years is probably about the maximum useful lifespan
for a laptop battery.

Of course the hard drive can fail, on any computer, and maybe laptop
hard drives are more prone to failure because they get moved around.
Apple uses stock hard drives from Toshiba, IBM, and other standard
manufacturers, so they are no better or worse than hard drives in any
other computer. I did buy the Applecare extended protection program,
which gives me a total of 3 years warranty coverage. Think that is good
insurance for a laptop. It pays to back up your data frequently to some
external medium. I do daily backups to an external Firewire hard drive,
and occasional backups to CD.

My main machine used to be a G3 Powerbook, which I used steadily from
1998 to 2004 -- again, using it for hours every day, taking it with me
everywhere I went, etc. It was -- and is -- a great machine, but I
decided it was time to modernize after 6 years. That old G3 Powerbook is
still working fine at 7 years of age, and my wife is using it.

OS X is terrific. I have been a Mac user for years. I thought the "old"
Mac OS was good, but OS X is really wonderful. It is rock solid, runs
for weeks, even months, continuously without trouble. It is very easy to
use, easy to network, easy to install new software, hook up different
external hardware, etc. The bundled applications that come with OS X are
darned good too -- Mail, Safari, iTunes, iPhoto, iCal, etc. Widgets,
that come as part of OS X 10.4, are fun and useful. Appleworks, which
comes installed on iBooks, is a very good productivity suite, that may
enable you to avoid the cost of MS Office -- though MS Office for the
Mac is very good.

I do appreciable computer work for clients who use Windows machines, so
I have a fair amount of experience with Windows. I am talking about all
the versions of Windows from 3.1 to XP. They are OK, but prone to
trouble and viruses that simply do not affect the Mac. I end up doing
most of my work on the Mac, including the work I do for my Windows-based
clients. I do my work on my Mac then transfer it to the client's Windows
machines. Makes my work a lot easier, the work I do is useful to the
clients, and they are quite happy. Sometimes I even get them to start
thinking about switching to Mac. However, they are afflicted by old
habits, fear of the unknown, and too many friends who only know about
Windows computers.

It pays to have a good carrying case for a laptop, and to always carry
it in the case when moving it. I have a very good Targus backpack with a
padded computer pocket and lots of auxiliary pockets. The case is useful
and easy to carry.

It is essential to keep liquids, food, etc, away from a laptop. Spill a
Coke on a separate keyboard, and you may end up losing the keyboard; run
over to the nearest office supply store and get a new keyboard for $50
or so. On the other hand, spill a Coke on your laptop, and the whole
computer will probably be ruined. For the same reason it is not good
practice to use a laptop in a place where someone walking by might spill
something on it.

And of course, laptop computers can grow legs and walk away. A security
cable is a good investment. Further, when I say I carry it everywhere, I
mean that. I take the backpack with the computer in it into stores,
restaurants, rest rooms, etc -- I don't leave it in the car or in the
hotel room. I never let it out of my sight, unless I know it is safe at
home.

Bill Collins

Signature

For email, remove invalid.

Shawn Hirn - 23 Sep 2005 17:40 GMT
> I currently use a combination of Linux and RISC OS on my home
> office LAN for all my programming and web development work.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

All hardware will fail eventually. How long YOUR iBook lasts depends on
how carefully you treat it. Portable computers of any type are prone to
more hardware problems than desktop machines. This is because portable
computers are typically moved around a lot and can be exposed to harsh
environmental conditions. For any laptop Apple makes, I suggest buying
an AppleCare policy on it. Apple has an excellent reputation for
supporting its products, esp. those that are under warranty. Apple is
also known as being first rate in terms of its products' reliability.

An iBook will last many years if well cared for, but you should also ask
yourself if you really need an Apple laptop as apposed to a desktop
system. Dollar for dollar, you get more computing power out of desktops
than laptops and desktops are more reliable.

That being said, you are looking at this from the wrong perspective.
What you should be looking at his how best to back up your data. As long
as you maintain good backups, a hardware failure will be fairly
inconsequential. You can replace hardware easily if it can't be fixed,
but what about your data? Regardless of which type of computer you use,
such as Dell, Apple, HP, home grown, you can assume that at some point,
you will have a hard disk failure, so be prepared for it.
Bonge Boo! - 23 Sep 2005 17:52 GMT
On 23/9/05 17:40, in article srhi-C50BA9.12405823092005@news.giganews.com,

>> Am I asking too much of a small laptop, or is the Apple
>> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> supporting its products, esp. those that are under warranty. Apple is
> also known as being first rate in terms of its products' reliability.

<splutters in tea> Where have you been living recently? Imac G5, eMac, G3
iBook, Aluminium Powerbooks, ipods. Apple don NOT have first rate
reliability.</splutters>

However they do (after prodding) invariably introduce "Repair Extension
Programs" for known manufacturing faults. Getting them to admit the problems
can take time, but they always tend to do the right thing eventually.
Warranty repairs can be slow, but they get done.

> That being said, you are looking at this from the wrong perspective.
> What you should be looking at his how best to back up your data. As long
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> such as Dell, Apple, HP, home grown, you can assume that at some point,
> you will have a hard disk failure, so be prepared for it.

Well said.
Walt Basil - 24 Sep 2005 16:18 GMT
> How long can I expect the following components to last:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> hardware and software sufficiently robust that I can expect
> years of trouble free service from it? Thanks for your advice.

I bought a 500 MHz iBook in 2000 or beginning of 2000.

It was still in good use until a couple weeks ago when someone
accidentally spilled a bottle of glue on it. It still would have worked
and been a useful machine if it weren't for that.

Keyboard - all the letters stayed on.

Trackpad - never failed to perform as new, but I also used a mouse for
most of the time.

Battery - lasted like new for the first couple of years. After that the
performance went way down. Ended up buying a new battery.

Hard disk - never had any problems.

Screen - received with 1 bad pixle, and lasted that way.

Filesystem integrity - never had to reinstall the OS, and never lost any files.

Weaknesses - only issue I had was the creaky hinge noise it made when
opening the screen.

I bought a 700 MHz iBook in October 2002.

Always performed, but the battery was about the same as the other ibook
- year and a half and it was only holding enough to last an hour to an
hour and a half use per charge.

It's still working great - I gave it to a friend. I just replaced it
with a new Powerbook a couple months ago. He uses it for his main
computer now.

BTW, the one with the glue still works... some keys are sticky and no
more ethernet internet. The X is the one who spilled the glue into it.

HTH

Signature

Walt Basil
http://www.basilweb.net
http://blog.basilweb.net

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.