Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Portable Macs / July 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

solid state mp3 player with A/C ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 12 Jul 2005 00:00 GMT
Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
(ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
POWER SOURCE?  Seems like a simple thing, but I've yet to find a player
that can.  We have an application for hold music on our phone system
that we'd like to hook an ipod or other device to, but not having much
luck.
Any help greatly appreacited!
name - 12 Jul 2005 01:53 GMT
> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!

It's not that difficult to modify an AC adapter so it can be connected
to the battery compartment of a portable mp3 player.

My iRiver iFP-899 runs on an AA battery, so I bought an AAA battery
holder, cut off one side and hooked it up to an AC adaptor.
All you need to do is ensure the player doesn't rest on a metal (or
some other type of conducting) surface to ensure you don't
short-circuit the AC adaptor.

http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/iriver1.jpg
http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/iriver2.jpg
http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/iriver3.jpg
Matthew Kirkcaldie - 12 Jul 2005 02:24 GMT
> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!

If you get a powered USB Hub you could play an iPod Shuffle connected to
it.  Or any number of other USB-based players I guess.

        MK.
barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 13 Jul 2005 16:44 GMT
Unfortunately I tried this already and it did not work.
The IPOD shuffle STOPS playing whenever it gets usb power, whether from
a hub or direct from a PC.  You press the play button and nothing
happens.  If it's in the middle of playing a song, and you plug it into
a usb port with power, the player stops and goes into a charging mode.
Thanks everyone for your input on this.  Still looking for a good
solution for us here....
J. David Anderson - 16 Jul 2005 03:39 GMT
> Unfortunately I tried this already and it did not work.
> The IPOD shuffle STOPS playing whenever it gets usb power, whether from
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thanks everyone for your input on this.  Still looking for a good
> solution for us here....

The iPod will begin to charge when first connected, once charged it will
then function normally for as long as it is left connected. I do this
all the time with an iPod with a dud battery (very short battery life).

Regards

David

Signature

To email me, please include the letters DNF anywhere in the subject line.

All other mail is automatically deleted.

barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 18 Jul 2005 18:09 GMT
are you specifically referring to an IPOD shuffle solid state player
vs. the standard ipod/20GB hard disk model?
I'm pretty sure my battery was fully charged (I let it sit for a few
hours on a usb hub) when I tried to press play again still nothing.
Maybe something's wrong with my ipod shuffle?
Thanks for any help !
name - 12 Jul 2005 02:53 GMT
> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!

http://www.creative.com/products/product.asp?category=4&subcategory=465&product=1874

The creative travelsound MP3 is the only mp3 player I know of that can
be connected to an AC adaptor. It can only be expanded with a 128 MB
smartmedia card and has 32 MB of built-in flash memory.
J. Clarke - 12 Jul 2005 06:13 GMT
> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!

A Sony Clie plays just fine sitting in the cradle.  Presumably other PalmOS
devices with MP3 playback capability will do the same.

Signature

--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

David W. Poole, Jr. - 12 Jul 2005 06:48 GMT
>Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
>(ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>luck.
>Any help greatly appreacited!

Cheapest Palm you can find that will run Real, has a headphone jack,
and has a SD card slot would do the job. Might be a bit of overkill,
although you may be able to find a cheap and capable enough PDA for
the price of solid state MP3 player.
Eric Johnson - 12 Jul 2005 07:54 GMT
On 7/12/05 1:00 AM, in article
1121122832.691906.271120@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com,

> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!

My Ipod came with a ac adapter which connects the adapter with the Ipod
using a firewire cable.

Why no hard disk?

ej
David W. Poole, Jr. - 12 Jul 2005 08:19 GMT
>Why no hard disk?

Lower power consumption, failure rate, cost, and operating environment
concerns would be the reasons I would choose a solid state solution
for this problem.
andrewunix - 12 Jul 2005 21:46 GMT
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:19:28 -0400, STKR@microsoft.com suggested:

:>Why no hard disk?
:
: Lower power consumption, failure rate, cost, and operating environment
: concerns would be the reasons I would choose a solid state solution
: for this problem.

Flash memory fails too, you know. I have a couple of CompactFlash cards
that died after a year or so of light to moderate use in a digital camera.

Signature

agreenbu @ nyx . net                             andrew michael greenburg

Aunt Judy likes it in the rear - 13 Jul 2005 00:57 GMT
> Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:19:28 -0400, STKR@microsoft.com suggested:
> :
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Flash memory fails too, you know. I have a couple of CompactFlash cards
> that died after a year or so of light to moderate use in a digital camera.

Ignore the nym, posting from work.

Flash memory fails, but usually as a result of writing to it. But since
flash memory has no moving parts, and hard drives do, flash memory has
far less environmental concerns than hard drives do. Plus, if you only
write to flash memory once, it should last much longer.

Each time you took a photo with a camera, you were writing to the card,
and in particular, the same space on the card, since the FAT had to be
updated on it. Bet a dollar to a doughnut that the FAT area was the
area on the card that tanked.
Eric Johnson - 14 Jul 2005 08:46 GMT
On 7/13/05 1:57 AM, in article
1121212666.611395.163920@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, "Aunt Judy likes it
in the rear" <Xeton2001IsATurdTampee.dwpj65@spamgourmet.com> wrote:

> Flash memory fails, but usually as a result of writing to it. But since
> flash memory has no moving parts, and hard drives do, flash memory has
> far less environmental concerns than hard drives do.

What environmental concerns?

Hard drives have a thing called MTBF or mean time before failure,

These are numbers in the 100s of thousands of actual work hours.

ej
J. Clarke - 16 Jul 2005 15:04 GMT
> On 7/13/05 1:57 AM, in article
> 1121212666.611395.163920@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, "Aunt Judy likes it
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> These are numbers in the 100s of thousands of actual work hours.

MTBF is not service life.  MTBF is used to estimate how many drives in a
server farm will fail within a given time or how many spares to stock in a
remote site that isn't going to have regular resupply.  It doesn't account
for normal wear and the like.

I agree with you on the "what environmental concerns"?

> ej

Signature

--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

David W. Poole, Jr. - 13 Jul 2005 07:14 GMT
>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:19:28 -0400, STKR@microsoft.com suggested:
>:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Flash memory fails too, you know. I have a couple of CompactFlash cards
>that died after a year or so of light to moderate use in a digital camera.

Agreed, but you were writing to those cards when they failed. Every
write operation that allocates space has to update the file allocation
table (FAT) on the card. As I understand it, flash memory is only
supposed to be good for so many writes, but nearly (in comparison)
infinite reads.

If you write to the card frequently from your PC, you may be able to
extend the life of the card by configuring the port for delayed
writing. That way writes to the FAT could be cached, eliminating some
of them.
Eric Johnson - 14 Jul 2005 08:51 GMT
On 7/13/05 8:14 AM, in article h1c9d1dkh9qncoopkejnbebpi3u2eq0cin@4ax.com,

> Agreed, but you were writing to those cards when they failed. Every
> write operation that allocates space has to update the file allocation
> table (FAT) on the card. As I understand it, flash memory is only
> supposed to be good for so many writes, but nearly (in comparison)
> infinite reads.

This would be incongruent with my experience. MY BEST FLASH CARD IS A 16MB
KODAK which is 5 years old and was OEM with my camera.

Works fine, but 16mb leaves little room for 3.2 Mp photos, so it has lots of
writes and relatively few reads, as I empty the cards all at once only when
they are full.

So there are 30x as many writes as reads.

My 128mb compact flash card died after about 1 year of use.

ej
Eric Johnson - 14 Jul 2005 08:43 GMT
On 7/12/05 10:46 PM, in article 1121201198.988971@irys.nyx.net, "andrewunix"
<agreenbu@nyx.net> wrote:

> Flash memory fails too, you know. I have a couple of CompactFlash cards
> that died after a year or so of light to moderate use in a digital camera.
I have one of those too.

ej
Andrew - 12 Jul 2005 08:22 GMT
>Why no hard disk?

Playing Greensleeves on endless loop hardly requires one.
Signature

Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.

Zimmy - 12 Jul 2005 10:11 GMT
We just got a new phone system and did this too.
We used a Perstel DR201 DAB radio with MP3 player which takes mains adaptor,
been working constantly for a few weeks now with no problems. They are
widely available in the UK at least.

www.perstel.com

Z

> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!
Wayne R. - 12 Jul 2005 11:49 GMT
>We have an application for hold music on our phone system
>that we'd like to hook an ipod or other device to, but not having much
>luck.

MOH means to the caller that 1) The called party is too busy to deal
with you right now, and 2) that you can't possibly have anything
better to do than listen to our wonderful wonderful music.

Far better: A small beep every 10 seconds will tell a caller that
they're still connected AND and allow them to do other things, like
tell others what a forward thinking compay they're calling...

(Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean it's a good idea to
do so.)
Davoud - 12 Jul 2005 15:43 GMT
Wayne R.:
> MOH means to the caller that 1) The called party is too busy to deal
> with you right now, and 2) that you can't possibly have anything
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean it's a good idea to
> do so.)

<flashing lights, pleasant ding> Someone finally got the right answer.
I have to need talk to someone /really bad/ before I'll listen to music
while on hold. I lay the phone down so that the music is barely
detectable and I can note -- and breathe a sigh of relief -- when it
goes away. </flashing lights, pleasant ding>

Signature

usenet *at* davidillig dawt com

barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 15 Jul 2005 17:06 GMT
I agree that just because you *can* do something doesn't mean it's a
good idea.  However, your assessment of MOH seems like one of many
possible perspectives.
I personally think MOH is much better than a beep for my tastes, as
does our company apparently.. I can do other things whether it's music
or a beep, but I think music is much more personable and calming.
I think it depends on the types of people you're putting on hold, your
client base, etc, we have plans to even have a christmas mix around the
holidays.  Just a touch of class from one perspective, from another
perspective, a waste of time.  As with everything, "it all depends".

> >We have an application for hold music on our phone system
> >that we'd like to hook an ipod or other device to, but not having much
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> (Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean it's a good idea to
> do so.)
Wayne R. - 15 Jul 2005 23:47 GMT
>I personally think MOH is much better than a beep for my tastes, as
>does our company apparently.. I can do other things whether it's music
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>holidays.  Just a touch of class from one perspective, from another
>perspective, a waste of time.  As with everything, "it all depends".

I'll bet exactly zero people call any company to listen to their
music. And no matter how wonderful your selections are, they can't
please everyone. And I doubt it's arguable to say that it's
presumptious to think filling their ears with it isn't their reason
for calling.

I can do other things too, but you've hijacked my ears. I can't listen
to my own music, can I? (After all, my own selections can't sound as
good as yours coming out of my crappy telephone handset.)

Do you think that the people who resent your 'taking their ears' are
counter-balanced by those who are soothed? Would you consider that the
people who might otherwise hear nothing resent the lost opportunity
for you to entertain them will they wait for you? Probably not.

It's aural crap in a world soaked in growing cesspools of it.
barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 18 Jul 2005 21:02 GMT
Just some thoughts on this tangent we've went off on:

>I'll bet exactly zero people call any company to listen to their
>music.

Agreed.  I also bet zero people call to listen to a beep every 10
seconds.

> And no matter how wonderful your selections are, they can't
>please everyone.

Agreed.  I'll add: Same with a beep every 10 seconds.. it wouldn't
please everyone.

>And I doubt it's arguable to say that it's
>presumptious to think filling their ears with it isn't their reason
>for calling.

Huh?  It's not only presumptious it's absurd.  The music isn't a REASON
for calling it's a condition you may be put into when calling.

>I can do other things too, but you've hijacked my ears. I can't listen
>to my own music, can I? (After all, my own selections can't sound as
>good as yours coming out of my crappy telephone handset.)

This is a great point, as a music lover myself I do agree with you
here.. while on hold with some other music, even if you have it turned
down you really can't listen to your own music.  But thinking on this
further... I would guess the majority of our clientelle (our company
specifically) wouldn't be wired into any other music,.. there's
probably a few who do have a radio or whatnot on though.  And of those
who have their radio on, maybe 1/10th of 1% even care or pay attention.
Thinking further I would guess the majority of people in the workforce
in general, spanning all companies, do not have music going at their
desks.  The only people who listen to music in this company (even
though more would like to I'm sure) are about 10% of the IT dept.  I
think that's a shame.. more music listening should be going on eh !

>Do you think that the people who resent your 'taking their ears' are
>counter-balanced by those who are soothed? Would you consider that the
>people who might otherwise hear nothing resent the lost opportunity
>for you to entertain them will they wait for you? Probably not.

As I mentioned above I definitely am sympathetic to it.  But I think
there's more of an approval of MOH than you give it credit for.  Keep
in mind that there are unique situations for every company, MOH isn't
the best model in all cases, but it seems a good fit in others.

> It's aural crap in a world soaked in growing cesspools of it.

Disagree.  I can understand that from one perspective, but certainly
not a universal truth for everyone.  Elevator music is pretty soothing
to my senses.  Certainily I do not prefer it over other music, but I
wouldn't ever personally go so far as to call it crap.
DaveC - 19 Jul 2005 19:52 GMT
Thus spake barnes_jude@yahoo.com:

> Just some thoughts on this tangent we've went off on:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Agreed.  I'll add: Same with a beep every 10 seconds.. it wouldn't
> please everyone.

I think a beep every 30 seconds, or so, would be fine. I think no one would
hand up if
1) no MOH was playing or
2) a beep sounded every once-in-a-while.

MOH, on the other hand, is something you CAN'T not listen to. If the tunes
are annoying (to you), you're more likely to hang up.

OTOH, I can't think of anyone who would find an occasional beep annoying.
Signature

Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't
ask a question here if I hadn't done that already.

DaveC
me@privacy.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group

DaveC - 18 Jul 2005 06:45 GMT
Thus spake barnes_jude@yahoo.com:

> I personally think MOH is much better than a beep for my tastes, as
> does our company apparently.. I can do other things whether it's music
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> holidays.  Just a touch of class from one perspective, from another
> perspective, a waste of time.  As with everything, "it all depends".

If it's MOH, I'll frequently hang up.

Do you consider myself and others like me not important customers? I'll bet
that you serve greater numbers of customers by presuming that they might want
their ears for something else, than presuming that they might want to hear
your music. I don't know anyone who would hang up while wishing for MOH.

We simply want to know we're still connected, but not be under the
presumption that we want to hear MOH. Think about it... again.
Signature

Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't
ask a question here if I hadn't done that already.

DaveC
me@privacy.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group

barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 18 Jul 2005 21:31 GMT
Point well taken... but we also shouldn't presume that certain
customers would not prefer MOH.  If I am listening to music I
definitely personally would not prefer MOH, but it's one of those
things that doesn't seem like too big a deal and until I've read this
thread I don't think I've ever felt any negative feelings towards MOH.

When I do make a call to a company to make a support call or whatnot,
the music is comforting to me not because the music is that soothing
but that I know I'm going to get my problem resolved soon. I think
that's how a lot of people approach it.  Would a beep be better for
MORE people than not?  I'd have to guess yuou're probably in a
minority.. but maybe a growing minority.  I kinda feel that it might be
one of those things that started and is hard to move away from becuse
it's so ingrained in us.

Tongue in cheek mode <on>: Maybe we should add a voice mail option when
put on hold "press STAR to turn off music!"
Actually that wouldn't be a bad little voice mail feature!
DaveC - 19 Jul 2005 19:47 GMT
Thus spake barnes_jude@yahoo.com:

> Tongue in cheek mode <on>: Maybe we should add a voice mail option when
> put on hold "press STAR to turn off music!"
> Actually that wouldn't be a bad little voice mail feature!

If you instituted that feature, I'd actually call your phone number for no
other reason than to be able to turn off MOH!!!  (c :

Seriously, a very good idea. Makes everyone happy! How often can you do that
for ALL your customers?
Signature

Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't
ask a question here if I hadn't done that already.

DaveC
me@privacy.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group

J. Clarke - 19 Jul 2005 22:23 GMT
>> Tongue in cheek mode <on>: Maybe we should add a voice mail option when
>> put on hold "press STAR to turn off music!"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Seriously, a very good idea. Makes everyone happy! How often can you do
> that for ALL your customers?

If you want to make ALL your customers happy then just answer the damned
phone.

Signature

--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

J. Clarke - 16 Jul 2005 15:07 GMT
> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!

Was wandering around CompUSA yesterday and when I passed the display of
solid-state voice recorders I thought about your question.

Why not just use a solid state voice recorder?  Sure, the sound quality is
not the same as for a purpose-made music player, but if it's going to be
heard over a phone system the phones will degrade the sound quality far
more than the recorder would.

Signature

--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

Hu Ru - 17 Jul 2005 23:16 GMT
Apologies to anyone who has read an earlier response by me - my email
is somewhat buggered.
I am suggesting using SanDisk Photo Album Model SDV2-R. It accepts 8
types of media cards (Compact Flash, SD, MemoryStick, Smartmedia, etc.
and also flash drives (USB keychain drives).
It is powered by an AC wall wart and will play music in a loop from
media card. It is controlled by a supplied infrared remote. Following
is from Readme file:

"You can also play music without a TV. Connect the A/V cable to the
Left and Right Audio In
connection of an audio system. Select the input source on the audio
system (if necessary). Insert
a card or UFD with ONLY MP3 files into the SanDisk Photo Album, turn it
on and wait until the
LED stops blinking. Now press play and the first music file will start
playing. At the end, the next
music file will start according to the music settings."

I tried it following above instuctions and it works O.K. Removable
media will make it easy to have seasonal mixes, along with "Please
continue to hold, your call is very important to us...." Does you phone
setup have an uninterupptable power supply? You would want to plug
player into that, because most won't restart after power out.

Main purpose of device is to show pictures from camera cards on TV,
with sound if desired. Also works as an 8 in 1 media reader (USB 1.1) I
did a slide show for a patient seminar at the hospital where I work and
it did fine.

barnes_jude@yahoo.com wrote:> Can anyone list actual models of solid
state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
> POWER SOURCE?  Seems like a simple thing, but I've yet to find a player
> that can.  We have an application for hold music on our phone system
> that we'd like to hook an ipod or other device to, but not having much
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!
sdhdfw@gmail.com - 18 Jul 2005 16:40 GMT
iRiver's IFP-990 has an ac adapter, and very reasonable on ebay as
iRiver prepares to launch it's new product line in August.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5789292189&category=48683&ssP
ageName=WDVW&rd=1

barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 18 Jul 2005 21:33 GMT
I'm looking into this model (THANKS BY THE WAY!!) and also the creative
travelsound.
hgsystems@gmail.com - 20 Jul 2005 15:05 GMT
It seems your simple query has gotten out of hand debating whether to
have MOH or not!

Well to get to the point: The Ipod shuffle works great for MOH.

I have a  Panasonic TAW-848 phone system hooked up to an IPOD shuffle.
For power it is connected to an iPod USB Power Adapter (available from
Apple for $29). Plug it in and it keeps on running. No problem. I too
contemplated playing with multiple units and soldering DC power to the
case, etc. But the Ipod is plug and play!

I suggest you get the 512MB model as it holds 120 songs and then do a
shuffle.

=hg

> Can anyone list actual models of solid state (no hard disk) players
> (ipod suffle, creative muvo, etc) that can PLAY WHILST CONNECTED TO A
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> luck.
> Any help greatly appreacited!
barnes_jude@yahoo.com - 20 Jul 2005 17:01 GMT
Hey thanks so much for your input.. I would love it if you could answer
one more question.  No matter what computer I plug our IPOD shuffle
into (MAC OR PC), the charging light blinks continuous amber, which in
the documentation it says this means the unit is acting as a disk?  Why
this would be I'm not sure becuase I formatted it properly and moved
music onto it with ITUNES, and the unit works fine while disconnected
from usb.  Bottom line is I cannot get the thing to get solid amber
and/or solid green while charging, from what you are saying if I can
get it in solid green state it should operate fine while plugged in.
Any thoughts?
David W. Poole, Jr. - 21 Jul 2005 00:55 GMT
>Hey thanks so much for your input.. I would love it if you could answer
>one more question.  No matter what computer I plug our IPOD shuffle
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>get it in solid green state it should operate fine while plugged in.
>Any thoughts?

Unless you have a multi-threaded OS on the iPod, if it's acting as a
disc, the playback capability of the unit should halt. I don't know
what the OS on the iPod is like, so YMMV.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.