Hi Henri,
> Remember that for the moment, Office on Intel Macs is running in
> emulation mode until Microsoft comes out with an Intel version for the
> Mac, so based on other emulation software speeds, one should expect it
> to run about 3 times slower than on PowerPC Macs. Of course it could be
> something else.
I think this is not true at all. The magazine MacTech did extensive tests
and reported them here:
http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.22/22.05/Office2004Benchmark/
They concluded Office under Rosetta runs about the same speed, maybe a
little slower in places, but certainly not 3 times as slowly.
> If you have an Intel Mac and if you have a PC version of Office, maybe
> you should conisder running it under Windows. If you are lucky like me,
> your organization wouls have licenses for Windows and for both Mac and
> Windows versions of Office.
Are you serious? Are you suggesting re-booting into Windows to use Office,
or using Parallels *beta* virtualization? Either way, that's a totally
unnecessary approach to the problem reported by the original poster.
> Anybody know how long it will be before Microsoft comes out with a
> version of Office for Intel Macs?
The next version will be a universal binary. The next MacOffice version
*cannot* come out until after the next WinOffice version, which is currently
scheduled for the end of this year (I think) and called Office 2007. There
are a lot of changes being made for the next version (recoding for Intel,
XML support, and I think *some* interface changes), so my guess is that it
will take at least a year after WinOffice. But the timing is just my
personal guess.

Signature
Daiya Mitchell, MVP Mac/Word
Word FAQ: http://www.word.mvps.org/
MacWord Tips: <http://word.mvps.org/Mac/WordMacHome.html>
What's an MVP? A volunteer! Read the FAQ: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Henri Arsenault - 15 May 2006 18:38 GMT
> Hi Henri,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> They concluded Office under Rosetta runs about the same speed, maybe a
> little slower in places, but certainly not 3 times as slowly.
On my G5 Mac dual processor, the Word project screen comes up in less
than a second. On my Intel Mac, it takes about 6 seconds. I find the
Office speed quite acceptable on my IntelMac, but it is cetainly slower
than on the G5.
Henri
Paul Berkowitz - 16 May 2006 02:57 GMT
On 5/15/06 10:38 AM, in article
arseno-576DD8.13381615052006@news.isp.giganews.com, "Henri Arsenault"
<arseno@nospamforme.ulaval.ca> wrote:
>> Hi Henri,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Office speed quite acceptable on my IntelMac, but it is cetainly slower
> than on the G5.
Yes, it's been reported that it takes longer to _launch_ PPC apps in
Rosetta. But I don't find 6 seconds a big deal. And all reports so far have
said that the speed difference _running_ the Office apps is hardly
noticeable. Nothing even remotely resembling "3 times slower", just a few
percent. I'd expect that opening slides in PowerPoint might take a worse
hit, but I don't have first-hand experience. And the other apps are meant to
be very acceptable.

Signature
Paul Berkowitz
MVP MacOffice
Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html>
AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/>
Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.
PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using -
**2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions
otherwise.