On 12/26/05 1:58 PM, in article
BFD6B2A2.16973%REMOVETHISoffice@ANDTHISstrategists.com.au, "Clive Huggan"
<REMOVETHISoffice@ANDTHISstrategists.com.au> wrote:
> But my main point in replying is to very strongly recommend Office 2004
> ahead of Office X, which was designed to work on a very early, pre-release
> version of OS X. OS X has moved on a lot since then, and Office 2004 has a
> huge number of things that work better.
Actually Office v. X was designed to work on OS 10.1, which was not
pre-release. But it was not particularly pleasant, either, and still had
lots of hitches and stumbles. (It was a free upgrade from 10.0, which really
ought to have been "pre-release", but wasn't either.) Or perhaps you mean it
was designed for 10.1.0, mostly before 10.1.0 was released. True.
Furthermore, Office v. X had hardly any new advances (not even bug fixes)
from the previous version 2001: it was almost entirely just a re-coding for
OS X, with new icons, done as quickly as possible to help Apple get users
over to OS X. Mind you, Office 10.1 (SR-1) had improvements, including some
specifically for later updates to the OD (OS 10.1. and 10.1.5), and Office
10.1.2 had a few improvements specifically for Jaguar (OS 10.2), which
helped.
Nevertheless, as Clive says, Office 2004 is streets and streets ahead of v.
X, and far preferable to it. It works great in OS 10.2.8, 10.3.x and 10.4.x
(even though it was first released before 10.4 saw the light of day. Its
SR-2, Office 11.2, was designed for Tiger as well as Panther.)

Signature
Paul Berkowitz
MVP MacOffice
Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html>
AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/>
Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.
PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using -
**2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions
otherwise.