
Signature
Jim Gordon
Mac MVP
MVP FAQ
<http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;EN-US;mvpfaqs>
Hey Jim
Thanks for the awesome answer. It is cool to be talking to a Microsoft
MVP guy.
> The Mac Business Unit at Microsoft works more like an independent
> company than you might expect. Essentially, they can make whatever they
> want as long as they make a reasonable profit. It's not a matter of
> MacBU persuading other parts of Microsoft to get these into Mac Office,
> it's a matter of them deciding whether or not adding these products will
> sell enough units and a price that will generate a profit.
Totally understood. Just wondering what the likely hood of this is.
> There's another big change coming from Apple: Macs on Intel processors.
> This is a big change for developers - maybe even as big or in some cases
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Check the rumor sites for the latest scuttlebutt about timing. I
> wouldn't want to hazard a guess.
Pretty cool stuff - even though I never metioned the Move to x86 :-). I
guess this means the next version of Office will be a universal binary.
Just bought a Mac Mini and love that damn machine. I knew the Intel
Macs were coming but as someone said, I didn't buy it for the machine
but the great OS. The Mac Mini is also a very very nice machine. If it
can last me three or four years I'll be happy. The Questions is though,
how long will Apple support PowerPC and produce OS X for PowerPC. I
guess once Apple stop this, other developers will gradually follow.
Obviously, I realise you can't say too much but is there any chance
that more programmes (from Windows) will appear in the next version of
Office. Office 2004 is totally sweet and has allowed me to use OS X
full time - although I still have Windows PC for Publisher! Keep up
the good work guys, you are doing a great job.
Seb
Barry Wainwright [MVP] - 04 Nov 2005 13:38 GMT
On 4/11/05 10:41, in article
1131100908.726236.26970@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, "Seb"
<sebpayne@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pretty cool stuff - even though I never metioned the Move to x86 :-). I
> guess this means the next version of Office will be a universal binary.
I believe (although I can't now find the quote) that MS said "they will
support macintel AND PPC.
Ah, found it:
<http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20050606corp.htm>
> We plan to create future versions of Microsoft Office for the Mac that support
> both PowerPC and Intel processors,²
I have not seen any press release that states there will be a single
universal binary, although I agree, that would be the most preferable.

Signature
Barry Wainwright
Microsoft MVP (see http://mvp.support.microsoft.com for details)
Seen the All-New Entourage Help Pages? - Check them out:
<http://www.entourage.mvps.org/>
A question comes to mind here:
Will current software written for OSX, say on the Macmini, be able to run on
the Intel Macs? Will Mac software written for the new Intel Macs run on the
current Macs?
Thanks.
> Hi Seb,
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>>
>> Seb
Jim Gordon MVP - 26 Dec 2005 19:00 GMT
Good questions!
To the first one: Some software will run on intel Macs. Some won't. For
the past year Apple has encouraged developers to make dual binaries
compiled for both PPC and intel Macs. I'm sure you'll hear a lot about
this at MacWorld Jan 6, 2006.
Some software might be backwards compatible. The more the software
touches the hardware, the less likely it is to be backwards compatible.
-Jim

Signature
Jim Gordon
Mac MVP
MVP FAQ
<http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;EN-US;mvpfaqs>
> A question comes to mind here:
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>>>
>>>Seb