
Signature
--- Mac:MS MVP http://www.cortig.net/wordpress/ ---
http://www.mvps.org - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
MVPs are not MS employees - Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS
Remove "NoSpam" to e-mail me - Retirez "NoSpam" pour m'écrire
I WISH! One of my biggest gripes about Office for the Mac is the lack of Access, as a result I don't own Mac Office. I'm a SQL Server DBA and do a lot of database development, and I have to run Parallels in order to get Access. FileMaker might be acceptable to some, but it doesn't come close to my needs. I haven't tried 4D, perhaps that's my next step. If that doesn't work, then it'll probably be MySQL and PHP.
I would really like to know why Access is not available for the Mac, I have yet to see a satisfactory answer. My guess is that Office Pro is a major income stream for MS on the PC platform and they don't want to dilute that stream. They may think there are not enough potential sales to bother porting it, or it's also possible that the code is extremely non-portable and they don't want to go to the bother of overhauling it for a small market.
One word of warning re: Parallels and Access. Make sure that you update your Parallels to the latest 3.x version. Under older versions of Parallels, you had to have your MDB files in a native NTFS partition, now you can have them in your shared Parallels folder. Before the patch you would get an error message along the lines that Access did not recognize it as a valid MDB.
Adam Bailey - 14 Mar 2008 12:03 GMT
> I would really like to know why Access is not available for the Mac, I
> have yet to see a satisfactory answer. My guess is that Office Pro is a
> major income stream for MS on the PC platform and they don't want to
> dilute that stream.
I doubt that. If this were the case there would be no Office for Mac.
> They may think there are not enough potential sales to
> bother porting it,
This is more like it.
> or it's also possible that the code is extremely non-portable and they
> don't want to go to the bother of overhauling it for a small market.
This is a big part of it too.
By the time Access was out on Windows, FileMaker was well entrenched in the
Mac market. Databasing is not like word processing or spreadsheets - most
people don't use Access so there's no pervasive need. It's simply not worth
a massive engineering effort to develop a program that statistically very
few people will use.

Signature
Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois
adamb@lull.org | Finger/Web for PGP & S/MIME
adamkb@aol.com | http://www.lull.org/adam/