Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Other MS Products / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Microsoft Access?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jft.gotham@officeformac.com - 11 Feb 2008 20:50 GMT
Does Microsoft offer Access for the Mac?
Anders Eklöf - 11 Feb 2008 21:40 GMT
> Does Microsoft offer Access for the Mac?

No. Never did. Never will?

Signature

I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour

Corentin Cras-Méneur - 11 Feb 2008 22:22 GMT
> > Does Microsoft offer Access for the Mac?
>
> No. Never did. Never will?

Probably never will. There are multiple alternative options though. I've
used 4D. I now use FIleMaker and it has some integration with Excel.

If you *need* Access, I guess there is still the option of using it
through Parallels, VMWare or CrossOver though,

Corentin

Signature

           --- Mac:MS MVP  http://www.cortig.net/wordpress/ ---
      http://www.mvps.org       -     http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
   MVPs are not MS employees    -    Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS
Remove "NoSpam" to e-mail me    -      Retirez "NoSpam" pour m'écrire

cloudster@officeformac.com - 13 Mar 2008 16:25 GMT
I WISH! One of my biggest gripes about Office for the Mac is the lack of Access, as a result I don't own Mac Office. I'm a SQL Server DBA and do a lot of database development, and I have to run Parallels in order to get Access. FileMaker might be acceptable to some, but it doesn't come close to my needs. I haven't tried 4D, perhaps that's my next step. If that doesn't work, then it'll probably be MySQL and PHP.

I would really like to know why Access is not available for the Mac, I have yet to see a satisfactory answer. My guess is that Office Pro is a major income stream for MS on the PC platform and they don't want to dilute that stream. They may think there are not enough potential sales to bother porting it, or it's also possible that the code is extremely non-portable and they don't want to go to the bother of overhauling it for a small market.

One word of warning re: Parallels and Access. Make sure that you update your Parallels to the latest 3.x version. Under older versions of Parallels, you had to have your MDB files in a native NTFS partition, now you can have them in your shared Parallels folder. Before the patch you would get an error message along the lines that Access did not recognize it as a valid MDB.
Adam Bailey - 14 Mar 2008 12:03 GMT
> I would really like to know why Access is not available for the Mac, I
> have yet to see a satisfactory answer. My guess is that Office Pro is a
> major income stream for MS on the PC platform and they don't want to
> dilute that stream.

I doubt that. If this were the case there would be no Office for Mac.

> They may think there are not enough potential sales to
> bother porting it,

This is more like it.

> or it's also possible that the code is extremely non-portable and they
> don't want to go to the bother of overhauling it for a small market.

This is a big part of it too.

By the time Access was out on Windows, FileMaker was well entrenched in the
Mac market. Databasing is not like word processing or spreadsheets - most
people don't use Access so there's no pervasive need. It's simply not worth
a massive engineering effort to develop a program that statistically very
few people will use.

Signature

Adam Bailey    | Chicago, Illinois
adamb@lull.org | Finger/Web for PGP & S/MIME
adamkb@aol.com | http://www.lull.org/adam/

Jose Geraldo - 19 May 2008 00:47 GMT
It must have at least runtime for MS Access for Mac in respect to the macusers. :frown:
JE McGimpsey - 19 May 2008 03:09 GMT
> It must have at least runtime for MS Access for Mac in respect to the
> macusers. :frown:

Won't happen.

Developing a run-time engine for MS Access would likely be nearly as
horrendous a task as porting Access, and there just aren't enough
potential customers to justify the investment.

Access fills a mid-level db application niche in Windows that has been
adequately filled on the Mac by FileMaker Pro, and R4. Since OSX is a
Unix-based operating system, heavy-duty db work is far better done using
a flavor of SQL, for which there are myriad front-ends as good or better
than Access.

However, you CAN use MacXL as a window into an Access db via ODBC:

  http://www.agentjim.com/MVP/Excel/ExcelHome.htm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.