>> I'm new to the Mac and OSX and have OSX 10.2.5. I'm familiar with Unix
>> and Linux so I'm comfortable with the command line. Anyway, I install
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Hope this helps!

Signature
"There's only one thing better than having a fishing boat, and that's having
a buddy who has a fishing boat."
> Mr.Smith (If indeed, that is your REAL name ;*) )
It's especially fun checking into hotels. I walk in, look guilty and say
"Smith".
> Thanx for the reply. I'll try that. As to your comment that the root
> account is rarely required, I still spend a lot of time in the root
> account on Linux. I hate the feeling of being shut out of my own system!
> Comes from my old DOS days, I guess. Thanx again.
You're never shut out if you're logged in as an admin. Sure, you may
need to issue the "sudo" command but that's all part of the security of
not running as root. Security isn't just password protecting something
but also making sure that someone else's processes don't run as root as
well as preventing accidents.
Actually, on Mac OS X, you should run as a Standard user and you will be
prompted for your admin name and password to make system changes
(installing applications, etc.). You still rarely need to ever log in as
root or even as an admin. I work in a group administering nearly 400
Macs in a corporate environment and have never had to log in with the
root account on a user's machine.
In the Windows world the same best practices apply and are even more
important. Running as a non-admin means that a virus or piece of malware
can not execute beyond the user's own privileges.

Signature
bill
William M. Smith, Microsoft Interop MVP - Mac/Windows
Entourage Help Page <http://entourage.mvps.org/>
Entourage Help Blog <http://blog.entourage.mvps.org/>
N3TQV - 09 Jan 2008 22:42 GMT
Yep, can't argue with your reasoning. As I get more comfortable
with getting to where I need to to get things done, I'll migrate
to a user login. Thanx again for the direction.
Say, while I'm here, what is your experience with OSX 10.2.5? I
have tried to run it on my iMac BondiBlue with 192 Meg of memory
and it seems sluggish. How much memory will allow it to run
efficiently? And please don't tell me the more the better because
I have a limited budget. I am using YellowDog 3.2 and it's runnig
just fine. Also, I have installed Debian and it too runs OK.
Keith
>> Mr.Smith (If indeed, that is your REAL name ;*) )
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> important. Running as a non-admin means that a virus or piece of malware
> can not execute beyond the user's own privileges.

Signature
"There's only one thing better than having a fishing boat, and that's having
a buddy who has a fishing boat."
John Gentile - 10 Jan 2008 01:21 GMT
A bondi blue has a 4 gig HD unless that has been upgraded, OS X can get
a little crowded in there. I think I remember reading that 10.3 worked
better on the G3s than the 10.2
John
> Yep, can't argue with your reasoning. As I get more comfortable
> with getting to where I need to to get things done, I'll migrate
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>> important. Running as a non-admin means that a virus or piece of malware
>> can not execute beyond the user's own privileges.

Signature
John Gentile MS, M(ASCP)
Laboratory Information Mgr.
VA Medical Center
Providence, RI
yjgent@cox.net
William Smith - 11 Jan 2008 03:09 GMT
> A bondi blue has a 4 gig HD unless that has been upgraded, OS X can get
> a little crowded in there. I think I remember reading that 10.3 worked
> better on the G3s than the 10.2
That sounds right to me too. Panther was a much better handler of
resources than Jaguar.
All versions of Mac OS X have required higher and higher amounts of RAM
compared to their Mac OS cousins. If you're able to squeeze in 512MB
then I'd say you have a good chance at running jaguar. But, the more the
better! ;-)

Signature
bill
William M. Smith, Microsoft Interop MVP - Mac/Windows
Entourage Help Page <http://entourage.mvps.org/>
Entourage Help Blog <http://blog.entourage.mvps.org/>