 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Mac Forum / Applications / Other MS Products / March 2006One more thing...
Is there any way to convert my wpd files (Word Perfect) to Word? Thanks Duane on a slightly different note (sorry duane, i dont know bout your problem), i am trying to connect my mac laptop to the internet thru my home pc. apparently i need to activate the smb server on the pc. cant find the SMB, dont know what it is or how to enable it. can anyone help?  SignatureThanks! Dunc > Is there any way to convert my wpd files (Word Perfect) to Word? Duane- Without Word Perfect to Save-As a compatible file, I don't know how you can do that. I checked AppleWorks and Microsoft Word, and neither have Word Perfect listed in either Open or Save-As formats. If you still have a machine that can run Word Perfect, see what the Save-As options are. The most universal format is Rich Text Format, .RTF. Most word processors (including TextEdit) can Open and Save in that format. If your Word Perfect can Save-As a Word document, there still could be a problem. The RTF has the greatest chance of success, although it may not preserve formatting as well as Saving-As a Word document. Until you figure it out, try both options. Fred > Is there any way to convert my wpd files (Word Perfect) to Word? The commercial product MacLinkPlus will convert them and a whole lot more: http://www.dataviz.com/products/maclinkplus/ SignatureMike Rosenberg <http://www.macconsult.com> Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida <http://www.cafepress.com/macconsult,macconsult4> Mac-themed T-shirts <http://bogart-tribute.net> Tribute to Humphrey Bogart Thanks for the info Mike. I just spent $1700 for this computer and I'm not ready to spend another $80-$100 for something it should do anyway. I've got about twenty days to send this back and I'm seriously considering it. So far, it is definitely NOT what the representative said it would be, compared to an IBM type. I was told "It just works!" It doesn't. Thanks Duane On 3/25/06 8:19 AM, in article 1hcr3a1.j6x49v1kmlhfaN%mike@POSTTOGROUP.invalid, "Mike Rosenberg" <mike@POSTTOGROUP.invalid> wrote: >> Is there any way to convert my wpd files (Word Perfect) to Word? > > The commercial product MacLinkPlus will convert them and a whole lot > more: > > http://www.dataviz.com/products/maclinkplus/ > Thanks for the info Mike. I just spent $1700 for this computer and I'm not > ready to spend another $80-$100 for something it should do anyway. I've got [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > > > http://www.dataviz.com/products/maclinkplus/ try NeoOffice http://www.planamesa.com/neojava/en/index.php Signature------------------------------------------- Swedish Webcams <http://www.webcams.zap.to> ------------------------------------------- Thanks, but it won't work with the new Intel Macs. Duane On 3/26/06 2:50 AM, in article eM4aErLUGHA.4900@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl, "Harri Mellin" <atz02-NoSpAm-@netscape.net> wrote: >>>> Is there any way to convert my wpd files (Word Perfect) to Word? >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > http://www.planamesa.com/neojava/en/index.php > Thanks, but it won't work with the new Intel Macs. > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > > > http://www.planamesa.com/neojava/en/index.php rosetta is a ppc emulator so that you can use ppc programs (not all) Signature------------------------------------------- Swedish Webcams <http://www.webcams.zap.to> ------------------------------------------- > Thanks for the info Mike. I just spent $1700 for this computer and I'm > not ready to spend another $80-$100 for something it should do anyway. > I've got about twenty days to send this back and I'm seriously considering > it. So far, it is definitely NOT what the representative said it would > be, compared to an IBM type. I was told "It just works!" It doesn't. So "It just works!" somehow translates to "it can convert any kind of document from any computer of any age"??? There hasn't been a Mac version of WordPerfect since 1999, it never was became widely used among Mac users, and even Microsoft doesn't support converting those documents. That's right, the fact that Word doesn't convert them is an MS, not Apple, issue. SignatureMike Rosenberg <http://www.macconsult.com> Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida <http://www.cafepress.com/macconsult,macconsult4> Mac-themed T-shirts <http://bogart-tribute.net> Tribute to Humphrey Bogart On 3/26/06 8:11 AM, in article 1hcsx9m.nwb0w81j2ifacN%mike@POSTTOGROUP.invalid, "Mike Rosenberg" <mike@POSTTOGROUP.invalid> wrote: >> Thanks for the info Mike. I just spent $1700 for this computer and I'm >> not ready to spend another $80-$100 for something it should do anyway. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > documents. That's right, the fact that Word doesn't convert them is an > MS, not Apple, issue. I understand it's an MS issue and not an Apple issue. I can convert the files from WP to Word in my old computer, even though I have hundreds of files. Unfortunately, it's just one of the straws that is helping to 'break the camel's back.' My primary complaint it that it is SLOW. The Apple store rep said it would be 'lighting fast.' It doesn't begin to keep up with my Pentium 4 and I have Pentium 1s that are faster. Safari is not a good program for blogging. When I try to listen to a broadcast in Safari and do other applications it breaks up or even stops broadcasting. I have installed Firefox on the Mac and if I use that it works much better. But I still can't upload pics to my blog with either Safari or Firefox. I got the Mac for its reputed graphics and video speed since I'm wanting to do more video. I haven't yet had opportunity to use the video program yet but I can't imagine it being any faster than my IBM clone in rendering the videos. I've tried to chalk it up to a lack of knowledge of a different OS but that excuse is wearing thin. Perhaps I got a lemon. I'll have to drive 150 miles to an Apple dealer (not an Apple store) to see if that's the problem. I'm really giving it every possible chance but so far am disappointed in its performance. Duane > On 3/26/06 8:11 AM, in article > 1hcsx9m.nwb0w81j2ifacN%mike@POSTTOGROUP.invalid, "Mike Rosenberg" [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Duane programs are not that optimized yet becorse apple switched to pentium processors recently and adobe and many others doesn't have any programs out for the intel macs yet. some programs you are using are ppc programs that rosetta emulates so that's why they are slow website problems are for the most time a mshtml problem (microsoft internet explorer koded pages and functions) Signature------------------------------------------- Swedish Webcams <http://www.webcams.zap.to> ------------------------------------------- On 3/26/06 4:05 PM, in article OGnlQnSUGHA.5108@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl, "Harri Mellin" <atz02-NoSpAm-@netscape.net> wrote: >> I've tried to chalk it up to a lack of knowledge of a different OS but that >> excuse is wearing thin. Perhaps I got a lemon. I'll have to drive 150 [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > website problems are for the most time a mshtml problem (microsoft > internet explorer koded pages and functions) Do you think they'll get the problems worked out soon or is it going to be a long, slow process? Duane > Do you think they'll get the problems worked out soon or is it going to be a > long, slow process? Duane- As someone else suggested, the problems you note with Mac web browsers, are partly caused by Microsoft deliberately making their browsers incompatible with the industry standards, and supplying web site authoring software to match. It is hard to resist the 5,000 pound gorilla. I think you have already made up your mind, but is it a matter of money? If you can afford it, I suggest you keep the Mac. If not, it could be quite a while before you are happy with it. As of now, what you see is what you get. When updated software becomes available, you almost certainly will have to purchase the new editions. Although the new Microsoft OS has been delayed until next year, wouldn't you want to upgrade when it does come out? Chances are you would be faced with a similar situation of having to purchase updated software. They may keep some backward-compatibility, but it would be "cripple ware" just like OS X running Classic applications. Fred Fred, It's mostly a matter of pros and cons with the Mac. At this point the cons are outweighing the pros. I'm still using my Windows based PCs more than the Mac. While that's probably an issue of familiarity I don't want to have to use up my time on deciding whether or not to keep the Mac simply because I'm unfamiliar with it. It does have a great 'gee whiz' factor but I'm looking for practical application. I am willing to take the time to learn a new OS if it will, indeed, do the work I need to do more efficiently and in less time. With the software issues you refer to that seems a good way off. I reasoned that since Mac was Mac and always was Mac (unlike Windows which seems to change constantly) all the bugs would be pretty much a thing of the past. Now, it seems I got into Mac in a major transition (Intel) and I got the bugs along with it. Do I take the chance with a $1700 investment and hope things will improve or get out while the getting's good? I've heard so much good from Mac owners there must be something to it. Still undecided. Duane On 3/27/06 10:04 AM, in article fmmck-2703061204440001@ac989199.ipt.aol.com, >> Do you think they'll get the problems worked out soon or is it going to be a >> long, slow process? [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Fred > Fred, > It's mostly a matter of pros and cons with the Mac. At this point the cons [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Duane wait for mac os x 10.5 that comes later this year > On 3/27/06 10:04 AM, in article fmmck-2703061204440001@ac989199.ipt.aol.com, > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > > > Fred Signature------------------------------------------- Swedish Webcams <http://www.webcams.zap.to> ------------------------------------------- > On 3/26/06 4:05 PM, in article OGnlQnSUGHA.5108@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl, "Harri > Mellin" <atz02-NoSpAm-@netscape.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Duane some problems will be fixed soon and some will take more time Signature------------------------------------------- Swedish Webcams <http://www.webcams.zap.to> ------------------------------------------- Well, I've pretty much decided to keep it. Guess I'll just have to develop a little more patience and spend some time learning the ins and outs of the Mac. Thanks, all of you for your input. Duane On 3/27/06 4:39 PM, in article uoTf3efUGHA.5660@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl, "Harri Mellin" <atz02-NoSpAm-@netscape.net> wrote: >> On 3/26/06 4:05 PM, in article OGnlQnSUGHA.5108@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl, "Harri >> Mellin" <atz02-NoSpAm-@netscape.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > some problems will be fixed soon and some will take more time I was in the same boat as you when I ordered my iMac, but the people at Apple called me to tell me I could get the really fast Intel Mac or I could still get the G5. I asked if the Intel would work as well as the G5 and was told only with native apps. That made my decision easy. I took the G5 because I didn't want to be frustrated as you seem to be. It has taken me about 2 months to get to the point of using my Mac as my primary. I really love it but there is a definite learning curve. You might want to try a book that I have found useful: Mac OS X Tiger Edition - The missing manual by David Pogue Hang in there. On 3/27/06 9:36 PM, in article C04DFD51.DA7%Rezduane@mac.com, "Duane Bristow" <Rezduane@mac.com> wrote: > Well, I've pretty much decided to keep it. Guess I'll just have to develop > a little more patience and spend some time learning the ins and outs of the [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] >> >> some problems will be fixed soon and some will take more time I suppose I'll keep the Intel Mac and trust they will get things updated to fit the OS. I'll check out the book. Thanks! Duane On 3/28/06 6:04 PM, in article C04F3923.40B%da.bluz@earthlink.net, "David Worrell User" <da.bluz@earthlink.net> wrote: > I was in the same boat as you when I ordered my iMac, but the people at > Apple called me to tell me I could get the really fast Intel Mac or I could [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] >>> >>> some problems will be fixed soon and some will take more time |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.