Computer Identity and Internet Spying?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 15 Jan 2006 06:30 GMT Does a specific computer have a specific identity regardless of who is using it and where?
Suppose a person changed ISPs, got a completely new email address from their new ISP, used a new personal name for it, and didn't put anything identifying on their email profile, such as a home address or phone number?
Could someone who was spying before on what this person was doing online continue spying although the computer has a new ISP and (supposedly) new user, because the computer itself has some identifying code embedded in its very vitals?
Does the physical location of the computer matter at all? That is, if the person moved completely out of the region (which would obviously result in changing ISPs) but took their same computer, could that same computer still be traced to them?
Is a Macintosh specifically different in this regard than any other computer, more easy to identify, less easy, or does this work the same for all computers?
Thanks for any information on clearing up these questions.
Cori
Todd H. - 15 Jan 2006 07:15 GMT > Does a specific computer have a specific identity regardless of who is > using it and where? It depends.
> Suppose a person changed ISPs, got a completely new email address > from their new ISP, used a new personal name for it, and didn't put > anything identifying on their email profile, such as a home address > or phone number? Assuming their computer is not compromised with a key logger, or anything that phoned home and tipped an individual snoop off to the physical machine's new whereabouts, it would be fairly untraceable, at least by mortals.
> Could someone who was spying before on what this person was doing > online continue spying although the computer has a new ISP and > (supposedly) new user, because the computer itself has some > identifying code embedded in its very vitals? If the creepy snoop managed to get software onto that computer unbeknownst to its rightful owner, then all bets are off.
If one wanted to be reasonably certain against being traced to a new location, purchasing a new computer, or completely reinstalling the operating system from original media would be the prescription I'd write.
> Does the physical location of the computer matter at all?
> That is, if the person moved completely out of the region (which > would obviously result in changing ISPs) but took their same > computer, could that same computer still be traced to them? Depends... The biggies for making the move untraceable would be to change the email address completely, use no identifying information in the new email addresses, don't leave traces behind in usenet newsgroups that might identify someone based on writing style or word choice, or whatever, change the version/type of email/news reader being used (or use one that's exceedingly common), and completely reinstall the operating system on the computer to make sure there isn't any spyware. If you wanted to be very paranoid and rule out the possibility of a hardware based snooping on the computer itself somehow... buy a new machine entirely.
Another thing to consider is that there was (and maybe still is) unique identifiers embedded in Microsoft office documents that someone very very savvy could use to try to track someone...but that's getting into the realm of having to have someone as resourceful as goverment agencies who REALLY want to find someone able to track taht.
> Is a Macintosh specifically different in this regard than any other > computer, more easy to identify, less easy, or does this work the > same for all computers? Not much difference ultimately.
While macs are designed such that they're perhaps a little harder to penetrate to begin with, and less pieces are available in terms of public exploits as a manner to get malicious software onto a system (such as a keylogger or some program that phoned home periodically). But that's a moot point, if you're following the advice of reinstalling the operating system to clear off any rogue bad programs that might let a very determined and creepy stalker tip off to new wherabouts.
Best Regards,
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
Frank Slootweg - 15 Jan 2006 15:05 GMT [deleted]
> Assuming their computer is not compromised with a key logger, or > anything that phoned home and tipped an individual snoop off to the > physical machine's new whereabouts, it would be fairly untraceable, > at least by mortals. The original poster ("Cori") did not set clear limits on the scope of the "spying" part of "someone who was spying before", so I guess it needs to be said, that not only the computer must not be compromised, but also the 'local' network, if any, to which that computer is connected must not be compromised. In other words, if the *network* has been compromised, re-installing the *computer* on that network will do little good.
[deleted]
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 16 Jan 2006 02:12 GMT > The original poster ("Cori") did not set clear limits on the scope of > the "spying" part of "someone who was spying before", so I guess it [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > been compromised, re-installing the *computer* on that network will do > little good. Well, of course not. For one, when you're trying to be mysterious you don't get specific, for another, when you're asking a question of possible benefit to many people you make the question as broad as possible.
Cori
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 15 Jan 2006 22:57 GMT > If one wanted to be reasonably certain against being traced to a new > location, purchasing a new computer, or completely reinstalling the > operating system from original media would be the prescription I'd > write. I've heard there are such things as programs to rid a computer of any spyware and viruses it may have picked up, and am asking what programs are best recommended and where can they be obtained? Will this be good enough? Thanks.
Cori
Unruh - 16 Jan 2006 00:24 GMT >> If one wanted to be reasonably certain against being traced to a new >> location, purchasing a new computer, or completely reinstalling the >> operating system from original media would be the prescription I'd >> write.
>I've heard there are such things as programs to rid a computer of any >spyware and viruses it may have picked up, and am asking what programs >are best recommended and where can they be obtained? Will this be good >enough? Thanks. Good enough for what. a stool may be good enough for reaching a jar on a shelf in your cupboard, but it is not very good for getting to the moon.
The best idea is to use an operating system which is not susceptible to the viruses, spyware, etc out there. (Your sysytem should NOT have picked up anything that you did not want on there). If your system does pick up something, backup, replace the operating system completely and restore your own material from the backup (trying to make sure that nasties are not hidden in your own materail)
Todd H. - 16 Jan 2006 01:59 GMT > > If one wanted to be reasonably certain against being traced to a new > > location, purchasing a new computer, or completely reinstalling the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > are best recommended and where can they be obtained? Will this be good > enough? Thanks. Such programs can only deal (at best) with known threats. Programs in wide deployment that the program knows about. There are no guarantees it'll get everything, and it'd be useless against a custom-written bit of nastyware. Again, the sophistication of hte attacker has to figure in.
As with any time you have the slightest suspicion that a rogue program may have entered your system, the only way to be certain that it is rid from teh system is to reformat the disk, and reinstall the OS from original media.
Best Regards,
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
Lars - 15 Jan 2006 08:42 GMT Of course. you should never assume these things, and I'm pretty sure that every computer has a built in un-chanageble serial number which is attached to the motherboard.
Jim Watt - 15 Jan 2006 09:37 GMT > I'm pretty sure >that every computer has a built in un-chanageble serial number which is >attached to the motherboard. Please explain how this is done for the benefit of those of us who don't understand quite how this is done and how its included in internet messages. -- Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 15 Jan 2006 11:00 GMT > > I'm pretty sure > >that every computer has a built in un-chanageble serial number which is [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Jim Watt > http://www.gibnet.com Yes! (Although I doubtless won't be able to pretend to completely understand your answer, I am interested in the subject and) by all means please do!
Cori
Jim Watt - 15 Jan 2006 12:35 GMT >> > I'm pretty sure >> >that every computer has a built in un-chanageble serial number which is [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >Cori 1. Each network card/device has a unique number, although it can be changed
2. Intel processors have a unique ID which can be turned off
3. MS Windows maintains unique identifiers derrived from the hardware and software in the actual configuatarion.
4. When you use the Internet you are given a IP address which may only be leased to you for the session, the ISP logs this the time and date.
5. Spyware programs and others can identify which computer you are using as can cookies legitimatly used to maintain state with web servers which are otherwise stateless.
Otherwise its down to paranoia. -- Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com
Todd H. - 15 Jan 2006 16:31 GMT > 1. Each network card/device has a unique number, although it can be > changed [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Otherwise its down to paranoia. And none of the first 4 things are passed around in internet messages unless there is malware on the computer that is hunting them down.
Reinstalling the operating systems removes those threats from the possibility list.
The only possible exception are Microsoft office documents containing their unique identifier number that could be traceable back to you by a very diligent and resourceful spy. I'm not sure, however, if reinstalling office on a fresh OS would yield a different unique ID.
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
Frank Slootweg - 15 Jan 2006 19:39 GMT > > 1. Each network card/device has a unique number, although it can be > > changed [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > And none of the first 4 things are passed around in internet messages > unless there is malware on the computer that is hunting them down. It depends on what the "spy" is doing. The OP said that the spy is looking at what the 'victim' is doing online. *That* part relates to "internet messages" (which probably also includes information on websites). But perhaps the spy is doing *more* than that. For example if the spy has access to the victim's local network (see my earlier response), (s)he could match a MAC address to an IP address. Later, when the IP is changed, (s)he can again determine the IP because (s)he knows the MAC. Next (s)he can use the IP to trace the victim in "internet messages". So the MAC address *can* be relevant.
Bottom line: It all depends on which pieces of information the spy has access to and to which pieces (s)he has no access.
Unruh - 15 Jan 2006 21:26 GMT >> > 1. Each network card/device has a unique number, although it can be >> > changed [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> And none of the first 4 things are passed around in internet messages >> unless there is malware on the computer that is hunting them down.
> It depends on what the "spy" is doing. The OP said that the spy is >looking at what the 'victim' is doing online. *That* part relates to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >the MAC. Next (s)he can use the IP to trace the victim in "internet >messages". So the MAC address *can* be relevant. There are no MAC to IP databases. the mac is relevant only on the immediate local network, and that is the only place where the mac is liable to be known. Ie, it is tough (not impossible) but tough) for someone in Ulan Bator to find a machine with a specific mac address even if he knows the country or city.
> Bottom line: It all depends on which pieces of information the spy has >access to and to which pieces (s)he has no access. Frank Slootweg - 16 Jan 2006 19:20 GMT > >> > 1. Each network card/device has a unique number, although it can be > >> > changed [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > local network, and that is the only place where the mac is liable to be > known. This is now rather moot, because the OP now indicated that the "spy" is someone associated with some web-board ("helps maintain the website in question") and the "spying" is done *on* the system which runs the web-board. So what we have is an 'operator'/'moderator'/<whatever> who is not really playing nice, but "spying" is, IMO, a gross overstatement.
It looks like the "spy" just determined the "victim"'s IP address, probably from his (the spy's) logs and blocked the IP address, so the victim can no longer log in. Big deal!
It would have been nice if Cori would have said so from the start, i.e. provide the *real* information on the circumstances of the "spying"/"victim". Would have saved us a lot of time which was now wasted on silly cloak and dagger stuff.
But to respond to your response: Yes, I know and that (access to the immediate local network) is what I meant. That may *seem* far-fetched, but in this day and age of wide-open private WLANs, it isn't.
> Ie, it is tough (not impossible) but tough) for someone in Ulan > Bator to find a machine with a specific mac address even if he knows the > country or city. Yup, but that's not what I meant. See above.
> > Bottom line: It all depends on which pieces of information the spy has > >access to and to which pieces (s)he has no access. Todd H. - 16 Jan 2006 19:34 GMT > It would have been nice if Cori would have said so from the start, > i.e. provide the *real* information on the circumstances of the > "spying"/"victim". Would have saved us a lot of time which was now > wasted on silly cloak and dagger stuff. Much agreed.
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 16 Jan 2006 02:21 GMT > It depends on what the "spy" is doing. The OP said that the spy is > looking at what the 'victim' is doing online. *That* part relates to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Bottom line: It all depends on which pieces of information the spy has > access to and to which pieces (s)he has no access. Well, I have good news and bad news. The good news is I asked this question at Macintosh forums and was ABSOLUTELY ASSURED "there are no viruses or spyware for Mac OSX."
To which I replied: Thanks, you guys make me feel so much better. This is one reason I bought a Mac, but I was afraid in the several years since purchasing it, some new viruses and spyware may have been invented for it.
(You know, just to show them I'm keeping on top of things.)
The bad news is, I happen to KNOW ON GOOD AUTHORITY that this computer user (let's call him "the victim") was using Mac OSX and that this other computer user (let's call him "the spy") KNEW that "the victim" had visited certain websites. ("The spy" was trying to prevent "the victim" from viewing a certain website on which "the victim" would like to view information that is not in any way private or confidential.) "The victim" has asked me to ask around whether if they do all these things (upgrading their Mac to a higher version of OSX, changing their ISP and their email) does "the spy" still have a secret way of identifying "the victim" through the computer itself?
"The victim" will be most greatful for your replies.
Cori
Todd H. - 16 Jan 2006 02:54 GMT > Well, I have good news and bad news. The good news is I asked this > question at Macintosh forums and was ABSOLUTELY ASSURED "there are > no viruses or spyware for Mac OSX." That seems like something that mac forum users cannot absolutely assure.
Nothing keeps a clever individual from writing and installing such software if they have access to the computer. A cron job written in perl that spits our the URL cache of all known web browsers on the system and makes a connection dumping that information out via netcat to a remote internet address... can certainly be done if the attacker has local or remote access to the computer (e.g. old roommate or s.o.). And because it's custom written, nothing on the mac would redflag it, and because there's no widespread malware for the mac, software level egress firewall filtering on a per application basis (e.g. anything to block outbound netcat connections) is in place, and even if there was malware protection on teh machine, the custom written solution would have a signature that no antivirus vendor would have bothered to write for...because it's custom.
> To which I replied: Thanks, you guys make me feel so much better. > This is one reason I bought a Mac, but I was afraid in the several [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > other computer user (let's call him "the spy") KNEW that "the victim" > had visited certain websites. Here's where it gets interesting.
Now we all wanna know "how." What was the relationship between the victim and the spy? Was the spy random remote dude, or was it someone who had frequent and unfettered access to teh machine? What was the computing background of the spy? Someone capable of writing some software or simple scripts?
> ("The spy" was trying to prevent "the victim" from viewing a certain > website on which "the victim" would like to view information that is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > "The victim" will be most greatful for your replies. Not enough information is provided about what sort of access the spy had to the victim's computer to perform a forensic analysis.
I would certainly continue to recommend the merits of a complete re-installation of the original operating system (or a fresh installation of a newer version of that operating system) from original media... while the computer is disconnected from the 'net.
Best Regards,
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 16 Jan 2006 09:17 GMT > Here's where it gets interesting. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > was the computing background of the spy? Someone capable of writing > some software or simple scripts?
> Not enough information is provided about what sort of access the spy > had to the victim's computer to perform a forensic analysis. "The spy" never saw "the victim" or his computer in person. "The spy" helps maintain the website in question (which, again, is not private or confidential in ANY WAY except for the usual membership requirements/logging in--"the victim" was NOT spying--just got on the wrong side of a few vindictive individuals there) and "the spy" has access to some sort of program available to message board moderators (so supposedly they can tell where the messages are coming from?) "The victim" does not believe "the spy" actually did anything bad to his machine, just that he has it in for him regarding having access to that one particular website.
> I would certainly continue to recommend the merits of a complete > re-installation of the original operating system (or a fresh [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Todd H. > http://www.toddh.net/ Hey, Todd, stupid question: if the connector/cable/what-have-you is unplugged and internet connect turned off during the operation, and the operating system newly installed, will this in any way affect files saved on "the victim"'s Hard Drive or other things such as favorites saved on a browser? I mean, it's just replacing the OS, right? Not everything stored everywhere on the whole machine? Thanks.
Cori
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 16 Jan 2006 10:33 GMT To try to further unravel the mystery, I double-checked with my friend as to whether "the spy" had used any identifying phrases to indicate what he had done and my friend said he specifically made reference to "Your IP address."
Now, surely "the spy" CAN'T be out to get EVERYONE who subscribes to the same Internet Service Provider as my friend, unless I mistake the meaning of "IP" as being "Internet Provider" as opposed to "Identity Personal" or some other thing. So this must indicate "the spy" has some way to, if not infiltrate, at least identify my friend's Mac in particular? What my friend wants to know is does this persist if he changes Internet Service Providers and Operating Systems but not Macs? Thanks on his behalf.
Cori
Todd H. - 16 Jan 2006 16:17 GMT > To try to further unravel the mystery, I double-checked with my friend > as to whether "the spy" had used any identifying phrases to indicate [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > changes Internet Service Providers and Operating Systems but not Macs? > Thanks on his behalf. Your friend uses a computer that only 5% at best of folks use, which cuts down the search space quite a bit for the admin. A persistent cookie might also be the identifying culprit.
Here's a sample line from my apache web server log on my web site. It tells me the IP address of the person who came along with a lot of info about their browser and operating system. My guess is that the website operator used this browser string to identify the victim because, unless there were tons of mac users on that board, your buddy's would look pretty unique since macs only command a small portion of the web surfing populace:
222.XX.XX.233 - - [16/Jan/2006:10:09:51 -0600] "GET /images/emacs.gif HTTP/1.1" 200 2064 "http://toddh.net/" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"
Your friend should clear all cookies from his web browser, and isntall and configure a web proxy for his Mac. Here's the link to privoxy for the mac: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=11118&package_id=29783
Privoxy can be configured to rewrite this browser identification string to something extremely generic, and to look like internet explorer on Windows XP service pack 2, for instance, which will make them blend in with the crowd quite a bit.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/aboutuseragent.asp
Best Regards,
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 17 Jan 2006 02:52 GMT > > To try to further unravel the mystery, I double-checked with my friend > > as to whether "the spy" had used any identifying phrases to indicate [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > 222.XX.XX.233 - - [16/Jan/2006:10:09:51 -0600] "GET /images/emacs.gif HTTP/1.1" 200 2064 "http://toddh.net/" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"
> Your friend should clear all cookies from his web browser, and isntall > and configure a web proxy for his Mac. Here's the link to privoxy for [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Todd H. > http://www.toddh.net/ Thanks for your answers, Todd! I had NO IDEA Macintoshes were so unique, let alone that they could be disguised! How should Hard Drive material be saved to back up and reinstall after the Hard Drive is wiped clean? On a CD or by some other means?
Cori
Todd H. - 17 Jan 2006 05:05 GMT > Thanks for your answers, Todd! I had NO IDEA Macintoshes were so > unique, let alone that they could be disguised! How should Hard > Drive material be saved to back up and reinstall after the Hard > Drive is wiped clean? On a CD or by some other means? I found this wikipedia page that's pretty interesting that shows the variety of user agents out there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent
And here are the stats from one source about relative browser popularity for their sites--which shows Mac browsers being pretty rare. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
another source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share
Backup data... Cd or external hard drive, either way. But the more I think about it, and that you're on mac, the likelihood the remote web operator getting software installed on a mac via drive-by download is quite small, so reinstalling the OS might be overkill for a Mac user.
I think if your friend gets their browser User-agent string to look a lot more like the rest of the world (by using Privoxy to spoof it as say Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
I think he might have a better shot of evading the web admin's detection. Good luck!
Best Regards,
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 17 Jan 2006 08:44 GMT > Backup data... Cd or external hard drive, either way. But the more I > think about it, and that you're on mac, the likelihood the remote web > operator getting software installed on a mac via drive-by download is > quite small, so reinstalling the OS might be overkill for a Mac user. Yes, my friend and I are both on Macs. I do have other questions about removing items from the Hard Drive, but it has nothing to do with spying so I'll save it for another thread.
> I think if your friend gets their browser User-agent string to look a > lot more like the rest of the world (by using Privoxy to spoof it as [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Todd H. > http://www.toddh.net/ That would be GREAT if that was all my friend had to do! He does have one other teeny question. Does his former IP address and the record the unscrupulous moderator no doubt has of it allow the moderator to spy on ALL my friend's online activities? Will it look suspicious if there was a whole bunch of activity on that IP up to a point and then suddenly none? My friend is thinking of maybe waiting six months after changing OSs and IPs before trying to join the message board, to further throw them off the trail. Thanks.
Cori
Todd H. - 17 Jan 2006 15:14 GMT > one other teeny question. Does his former IP address and the record > the unscrupulous moderator no doubt has of it allow the moderator to > spy on ALL my friend's online activities? Nah. To spy on all of the friend's online activities, he'd need software on the computer, or to have a piece of hardware in the network at his location. Both are rather unlikely for the person to have.
> Will it look suspicious if there was a whole bunch of activity on > that IP up to a point and then suddenly none? Probably. But then again you want the guy to wonder "where the hell'd he go?"
> My friend is thinking of maybe waiting six months after changing OSs > and IPs before trying to join the message board, to further throw > them off the trail. Not a bad idea at all.
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
Todd H. - 16 Jan 2006 16:07 GMT > > Here's where it gets interesting. > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > "The spy" never saw "the victim" or his computer in person. Ah. Okay, that rules out a lot of the tin foil hat stuff I was talking about earlier then.
> "The spy" helps maintain the website in question (which, again, is > not private or confidential in ANY WAY except for the usual [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > message board moderators (so supposedly they can tell where the > messages are coming from?) About all a remote website authore can know about an inbound poster: o ip address (which you said was different because the victim had moved and had new service established). Did the spy have any way of knowing where the victim had moved? o account name/password (which you said was different becaust he victim created a new login/password on the site in quetion) o Web browser (if the victim uses a unique web browser, this can be a good clue) o Persistent cookies (if any). This is my leading suspicion how the remote web site spy knew the person had come back, and from which new ip address. o writing style and word choice. even the words that are misspelled and how they are misspelled can be used to identify someone. How you sign your posts can also give ya away. A determined spy can tell a lot just from word choice.
> Hey, Todd, stupid question: if the connector/cable/what-have-you is > unplugged and internet connect turned off during the operation, and the > operating system newly installed, will this in any way affect files > saved on "the victim"'s Hard Drive or other things such as favorites > saved on a browser?
> I mean, it's just replacing the OS, right? Not everything stored > everywhere on the whole machine? Thanks. Depends if you reinstall the operating system over what's already there, or you do as i suggest and format the hard drive first, then reinstall the OS. In the former situation, the cookie and cache data may persist, in the latter they definitely do not. But, with a format of the hard drive you also lose all your data unless you back up first.
However that's probably not necessary in this case, now that we can reasonably rule out a malware infection or intentionally installed software as the answer of "how didthe spy detected the victim?" If all the spy is is a remote website operator, the solution is easier:
o Anonymous web surfing software such as Ghostsurf or Tor+Privoxy. Because the victim's new ip address is already known to the spy, they have to change it somehow. Short of getting a new ISP (which will be in the same geographic area anyway, and provide a clue), anonymouse surfing software is the way to go. o Delete all cookies from the current web brwoser. Empty the cache files. o Change web browsers. If the victim uses IE now, switch to Firefox. If they use Firefox now, switch to Opera. This does two things: changes the browser info that is sent to the web site in question and uses a different cookie set so a persistent cookie from th eold days won't be seen. o start writing in a different style.
If the remote website operator did manage to get some spyware installed onto the computer, then the reformat and reinstall the operating system takes care of that.
or better still, the simple and obvious solution:
o The victim should leave the board pursue other interests. If there's a group that has it out for the victim on a given board, it's just not good for the victim's mental health to keep going back and doing battle. There are few if any discussion boards that are worth this level of drama.
I hope it all works out regardless!
Best Regards,
 Signature Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
Dave - 15 Jan 2006 14:33 GMT > Does a specific computer have a specific identity regardless of who is > using it and where? Each will have a MAC address, although I'm not sure if that is passed around the internet, unless you have some sort of spyware or virus. As someone else said, that can be changed, but I'm sure the details of how to do it would depend on the hardware and so might not always be possible.
Sun workstations have a hostid
sparrow /export/home/drkirkby % hostid 80aaf46d
which some software uses (mainly for licensing issues). That can be changed, but it is a bit risky, since if you get it wrong, you can end up with a dead system that needs a chip replaced - not a particulary difficult task as it is socketed on all them I know.
And of course, as someone else mentioned, there is spyware.
If you are really bothered, upgrade Windows to Solaris. I'm not aware of any viruses for Solaris, and none of the usual winblows exploits will work. That is not to say a Solaris system can't be compromised, but it is far more difficult since it is much more secure than winblows. Few know anything much about it either, which again is to your advantage. Solaris on x86 (or SPARC hardware for that matter) is a free download, although it is a large download. There are 4 CDs or a DVD image
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/
You can buy a CD for a nominal fee from Sun if you can't download it due to bandwidth limitations. Both 32 and 64-bit is supported on x86. For SPARC hardware, you *must* have a 64-bit system, but that should not bother you.
 Signature Dave K
http://www.southminster-branch-line.org.uk/
Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam. It is always of the form: month-year@domain. Hitting reply will work for a couple of months only. Later set it manually. The month is always written in 3 letters (e.g. Jan, not January etc)
cmashieldscapting@hotmail.com - 17 Jan 2006 09:43 GMT Now, this is interesting. I was going through my Hard Drive again to see if there was ANYTHING else I could throw out to make more space and found this:
"Cache Out X is a utility for Mac OS X that specializes in deleting the caches files of the System and of Internet navigators. Additionally it can delete virtual memory file(s), erase system history files, as well as cookies and Internet-related navigation/download history files. Its Auto-Cleaner function cleans caches at log in or as scheduled by the user thanks to iCal support; its secure deletion of Internet archives makes its use especially suitable to public access computers."
Of course, I'm not enough of a computer whiz to know if it was there because I "had" installed it on my Hard Drive or because I was "going to" install it on my Hard Drive, so I went ahead and installed it and it said it was installed successfully. I noticed there was a little less space on my Hard Drive after doing this than before.
Anyone else use this? Now that it's installed, will it get rid of all those nasty cookies on a periodic basis for me? What does it mean "at log in or as scheduled by the user"? Is there some setting I'm supposed to make on it and haven't 'cause I can't find it? Even if not, I'll probably end up trying many of the other suggestions given and with all of them, at least some should work.
Cori
|
|
|