Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / General / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Font Auto-Activation -- Leopard's "Missing Feature"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TaliesinSoft - 30 May 2008 15:30 GMT
Prior to the release of Leopard an oft touted forthcoming feature was font
auto-activation where a referenced font would be made active if a document
using that font was opened.

Sharon Zardetto, in her book, Take Control of Fonts in Leopard, even devoted
a chapter to font auto-activation.

From what I can gather this feature worked in Leopard 10.5 but has failed to
work in the subsequent releases.

My tests using Pages, Keynote, and TextEdit all fail, and I'm currently
running Leopard 10.5.3.

Interestingly there hasn't been a peep, at least not that I'm aware of, from
Apple regarding this disappearing feature.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Dave Balderstone - 30 May 2008 16:54 GMT
> Prior to the release of Leopard an oft touted forthcoming feature was font
> auto-activation where a referenced font would be made active if a document
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Interestingly there hasn't been a peep, at least not that I'm aware of, from
> Apple regarding this disappearing feature.

I noted it, and when 10.5 came out looked at it briefly and rejected
it. I'm afraid I don't remember why, but I recall thinking "Well. THIS
is what we need." (I work in the publishing industry).

If you need robust font auto-activation, get Linotype FontExplorer.
It's free.

I don't understand the approach Apple has taken to fonts and font
management, it's certainly not particularly friendly to the industry
that maintained them through the "dark times".

Signature

Woodworking links and more at http://www.woodenwabbits.com

Dave Balderstone - 30 May 2008 18:44 GMT
> I noted it, and when 10.5 came out looked at it briefly and rejected
> it. I'm afraid I don't remember why, but I recall thinking "Well. THIS
> is what we need." (I work in the publishing industry).

s/b "NOT what we need."

Signature

Woodworking links and more at http://www.woodenwabbits.com

TaliesinSoft - 30 May 2008 19:48 GMT
[responding to my commenting on the non-working font auto-activation feature
in Leopard]  

> I noted it, and when 10.5 came out looked at it briefly and rejected it.
> I'm afraid I don't remember why, but I recall thinking "Well. THIS is what
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> management, it's certainly not particularly friendly to the industry that
> maintained them through the "dark times".

Fortunately for me, and I'm not in the publishing game other than editing a
monthly newsletter for my local Macintosh user group, the non-functioning of
auto-activation is somewhat of a nuisance but not a killer.

other than the lack of auto-activation the built-in font management of
Leopard has served my needs.

At this time I have my font library organized by vendor and family, each
vendor's fonts being in an appropriately named folder and all of the faces
for a given family clustered within a sub-folder to the vendor folder. Other
than the system fonts all of the fonts are placed in the Shared user folder
so they can be accessed from any of my several user accounts.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Dave Balderstone - 30 May 2008 22:05 GMT
> [responding to my commenting on the non-working font auto-activation feature
> in Leopard]  
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> than the system fonts all of the fonts are placed in the Shared user folder
> so they can be accessed from any of my several user accounts.

FontExplorer can maintain the folder structure in its own display,
which is a nice feature. But if you're not dealing with several
thousand fonts (like we are) then you likely don't need it.

Still, it's free, plays nice with the OS, and is (did I mention it's
free?) free. You may want to check it out.

Signature

Woodworking links and more at http://www.woodenwabbits.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.