Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / General / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SuperDuper or Carbon Copy Cloner?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Earle Jones - 18 Dec 2007 00:54 GMT
Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
Copy Cloner?

The reviews in "Version Tracker" steer me toward SuperDuper ($28
shareware fee).

What do you think?

Thanks!

earle
*
Intel iMac 2GB RAM,250GB internal HD, 320GB + 160GB external HD --
scanner, photo printer, laser printer, etc.
Warren Oates - 18 Dec 2007 01:20 GMT
> Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
> 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
> Copy Cloner?

If that's all you want to do, do it with CCC. Or just use Disk Utility.
Signature

W. Oates

nospam - 18 Dec 2007 03:59 GMT
> Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
> 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
> Copy Cloner?

superduper is the better program, however, it is not currently
compatible with leopard.  if you clone it in tiger prior to upgrading,
it will be fine, and you will need to wait for the update before using
it after that.
Daniel Cohen - 18 Dec 2007 16:15 GMT
> > Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
> > 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it will be fine, and you will need to wait for the update before using
> it after that.

And the update is due soon. See the SuperDuper blog for details.

Also, for a single backup, SuperDuper is free.

You have to pay to get the much faster Smart Update feature (where
changed files are updated, as distinct from the basic proccess of
erasing evrything and then copying).
Signature

http://www.decohen.com
Send e-mail to the Reply-To address;
mail to the From address is never read

M-M - 18 Dec 2007 17:56 GMT
CCC, even though it says it will work with Leopard, does not do a very
good job and leaves many things a bit messed up.

After reinstalling from a CCC backup, the Addressbook would no longer
allow me to edit an entry.

Sheepshaver stopped working (but came back after a reinstall of the
standalone 10.5.1 update).

There were a few other flaky things, can't remember, but when 1 or 2
things get messed up, you can be sure there are others.

I will wait for the SD update.
J.J. O'Shea - 18 Dec 2007 17:11 GMT
> Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
> 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
> Copy Cloner?
>
> The reviews in "Version Tracker" steer me toward SuperDuper ($28
> shareware fee).

SuperDuper! requires the shareware fee only if you want to use certain
features. (I think those features are useful, and have paid the fee.)
However, SD! is not (currently) compatible with Leopard. There is, allegedly,
a fix in the works. CCC _is_ compatible with Leopard. If you need something
_right now_ and are running Leopard, go with CCC. If you're running Tiger or
earlier, SD! is easier to handle, though CCC is more thorough. If you're
running Leopard, CCC is the tool to use for cloning.

Note that ProSoft's Drive Genius allegedly has the ability to clone Leopard
volumes, and that Prosoft's Data Rescue and Data Backup also allegedly work
with Leopard. I have not personally verified any of this, and all three are
_commercial_ apps which cost substantially more than SD!. I know that Drive
Genius will clone Tiger volumes without problems, except that it can't clone
the boot volume.

I personally used SD! for most cloning operations pre-Leopard, and am
currently using CCC until SD! becomes Leopard-compatible.

> What do you think?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Intel iMac 2GB RAM,250GB internal HD, 320GB + 160GB external HD --
> scanner, photo printer, laser printer, etc.

Signature

email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

nospamatall - 18 Dec 2007 18:33 GMT
> Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
> 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Intel iMac 2GB RAM,250GB internal HD, 320GB + 160GB external HD --
> scanner, photo printer, laser printer, etc.

CCC works fine for me. It will do incremental backups and archive old
stuff if I want it to. Also you can tell it not to backup certain
directories if you like. It has a scheduling thing too I think, but I've
never used scheduling so can't comment on that.

Andy
Francis Fitzpatrick - 27 Feb 2008 03:51 GMT
> Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
> 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Intel iMac 2GB RAM,250GB internal HD, 320GB + 160GB external HD --
> scanner, photo printer, laser printer, etc.

SuperDuper is far easier to use and works well.
Sally Shears - 27 Feb 2008 04:13 GMT
> > Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
> > 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
> > Copy Cloner?
>
> SuperDuper is far easier to use and works well.

Carbon Copy Cloner is pretty easy to use and works well.

The author, Mike Bombich, was a pioneer in figuring out how to clone a
Mac OS X disk. I just used the current version 3.01 to clone a Leopard
disk that's fully bootable and restore-from-able.

 -- Sally

Signature

Sally Shears (a.k.a. "Molly")
SallyShears@gmail.com -or- Sally@Shears.org
SallyShears (at) gmail (dot) com

Tim Lance - 27 Feb 2008 11:50 GMT
>>> Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
>>> 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>   -- Sally

On both CCC's and SD!'s forums there's been much discussion on the finer
points of how well each deals with the monkey wrench Apple threw into Leopard
with the final release - ACLs (Access Control Lists). Best I can tell, CCC
and the other early apps that claimed Leopard compatibility had issues with
ACLs which may not appear at first, but subsequent booting and permissions
issues appear with those apps. SD!'s not perfect but is better in many
people's opinion and is faster and easier.

Are you, Sally, the same Molly I know elsewhere as a beagle aficionado?

Signature

Tim
lance_1012@hotmail.com

Lewis - 27 Feb 2008 14:01 GMT
> On both CCC's and SD!'s forums there's been much discussion on the finer
> points of how well each deals with the monkey wrench Apple threw into Leopard
> with the final release - ACLs (Access Control Lists)

ACLs are not new to Leopard, they were in Tiger as well.

Signature

Bart: This is the worst day of my life.
Homer: This is the worst day of your life SO FAR.

Tom Stiller - 27 Feb 2008 14:53 GMT
> > On both CCC's and SD!'s forums there's been much discussion on the finer
> > points of how well each deals with the monkey wrench Apple threw into
> > Leopard
> > with the final release - ACLs (Access Control Lists)
>
> ACLs are not new to Leopard, they were in Tiger as well.

And there was no proper backup/restore for them there either.

Signature

Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint =  5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3  7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF

Lewis - 28 Feb 2008 01:01 GMT
> > > On both CCC's and SD!'s forums there's been much discussion on the finer
> > > points of how well each deals with the monkey wrench Apple threw into
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> And there was no proper backup/restore for them there either.

True enough.

Signature

Bart: This is the worst day of my life.
Homer: This is the worst day of your life SO FAR.

billy@MIX.COM - 28 Feb 2008 03:12 GMT
> > ACLs are not new to Leopard, they were in Tiger as well.
>
> And there was no proper backup/restore for them there either.

Once again, here's a report about how various backup utilities
handle various things, including ACLs -

http://inik.net/node/151

And, since it's almost a year old, here's a tool you can use
to run your own tests on whatever you'd like, today -

http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2007/04/27/introducing-backup-bouncer/

Billy Y..
Jolly Roger - 28 Feb 2008 08:05 GMT
> here's a tool you can use
> to run your own tests on whatever you'd like, today -
>
> http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2007/04/27/introducing-backup-bouncer/

Nice.  Thanks for posting this.

Signature

Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. If you
must contact me through e-mail, let me know when you send email to
this address so that your email doesn't get eaten by my SPAM filter.

JR

Király - 27 Feb 2008 15:07 GMT
> ACLs are not new to Leopard, they were in Tiger as well.

But they were turned off by default, and the OS didn't make use of them.  
That changed with Leopard.

Signature

K.

Lang may your lum reek.

Tim Lance - 27 Feb 2008 20:30 GMT
>> ACLs are not new to Leopard, they were in Tiger as well.
>
> But they were turned off by default, and the OS didn't make use of them.  
> That changed with Leopard.

Yep!

Signature

Tim
lance_1012@hotmail.com

rezwits - 27 Feb 2008 21:14 GMT
>> Before I install Leopard I want to clone my current startup disk (Sys
>> 10.4.11) on an external HD.  Which is better -- SuperDuper or Carbon
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> SuperDuper is far easier to use and works well.

Scheduling works better in CCC, but CCC can't format a drive right if
you use case-sensitive...  SuperDuper can, but the scheduling is week,
you basically have to be logged into the account and superduper has to
be launched, or something like that, I just do both to make sure it
goes thru.  I would use ccc everytime...
Signature

Adobe - Preventing the case-sensitive revolution everyday

TaliesinSoft - 27 Feb 2008 21:37 GMT
> Scheduling works better in CCC, but CCC can't format a drive right if you
> use case-sensitive...  SuperDuper can, but the scheduling is week, you
> basically have to be logged into the account and superduper has to be
> launched, or something like that, I just do both to make sure it goes
> thru.  I would use ccc everytime...

In SuperDuper! one sets up a schedule by first, in the main window, selecting
the source and target drives, and then in the schedule window selecting the
week(s) of the month, the day(s) of the week, and the time the schedule will
run. One can have an arbitrary number of schedules defined, and all of them
or a subset of them can be currently active.

I'm not sure how setting up a schedule could be easier.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

rezwits - 28 Feb 2008 18:41 GMT
>> Scheduling works better in CCC, but CCC can't format a drive right if you
>> use case-sensitive...  SuperDuper can, but the scheduling is week, you
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I'm not sure how setting up a schedule could be easier.

Well my thing is, you can't be logged out, or logged into some other
account.  Because when I setup a schedule in SuperDuper (2.1.4), the
event didn't start unless I was logged in, and had SuperDuper running.  
With CCC you don't have to be logged in or have ccc running... Full
Background
Signature

Adobe - Preventing the case-sensitive revolution everyday

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.