free tools and/or command to image the whole system
|
|
Thread rating:  |
alexandre_paterson@yahoo.fr - 26 Dec 2006 23:11 GMT Hi everybody,
I just got an MacBook Pro, Core 2 Duo. Nice and fast machine.
I'd like to image/backup the whole OS. I'm not a complete newbie when it comes to imaging / backuping / templating / offline-scanning / duplicating (whatever ;) whole OSes...
I'd like to use free tools.
Here's what I'm used to do for other system :
- Linux : I mount the disk/partition from another system, either from another hard disk (unplugging the hard disk of the system I want to image then plugging it in another machine) or from a "Live CD" (hence the system I'm backing is never running), then do either an "tar" or an "cp -a". I've done that many times (including for duplicating Xen para-virtualized Linux guests).
- Windows : I either use an old version of Ghost (dating from way before Norton bought the company producing Ghost) that can image FAT and NTFS partition (for 'real' Windows machine) or... I copy the fake disk image (qcow compressed disk image) used by qemu (emulator) or Xen (hardware-virtualized Windows).
How would I proceed with MacOS X ?
Is it possible to backup a whole MacOS X disk / partition using 'tar' or 'cp' ?
If it's possible to use some shell command, is it possible to run them from a Linux live CD ?
Ideally I'd like to have some compressed archive file (a single file) that I can easily mount from other Unix systems (Linux and OS X) and easily re-install (either on the same hard disk as the one it came from or on a new hard disk / Mac / etc.).
Thanks in advance for pointers, hints, tips and whatnot :)
Michael Vilain - 26 Dec 2006 23:46 GMT > Hi everybody, > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Thanks in advance for pointers, hints, tips and whatnot :) The utilities provided with MacOS X aren't enough to completely backup your system, according to some. There are filesystem metadata attributes which they fail to replicate. That's not that important to me, so YMMV. Here's a link to someone who's done a lot of testing in this space. Be aware that much of these tools aren't free, so you'll either have to shell out some bucks or roll your own. There's also some fixes in 10.4.9 that will address the metadata complaint this guy has with rsync.
http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/03/05/the-state-of-backup-and-cloning -tools-under-mac-os-x/
 Signature DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee...
alexandre_paterson@yahoo.fr - 27 Dec 2006 05:35 GMT first of all thanks to all of you for your answers, this should get me started with my tests...
> Here's a link to someone who's done a lot of testing in > this space. Be aware that much of these tools aren't free, so you'll [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/03/05/the-state-of-backup-and-cloning > -tools-under-mac-os-x/ Very interesting read, this will sure help me a lot.
Thanks again,
Alex
Wes Groleau - 28 Dec 2006 04:53 GMT > The utilities provided with MacOS X aren't enough to completely backup > your system, according to some. There are filesystem metadata [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > fixes in 10.4.9 that will address the metadata complaint this guy has > with rsync. RsycX is a GUI over rsync, plus it comes with a version of rsync that is wise to resource forks.
"ditto" that comes with OS X also does OK.
But even with both of these, your system is not bootable unless the right folder is "blessed." And if I understand correctly, that means putting the boot path into a firmware variable. Since a firmware variable is not on the disk, no disk copying scheme will handle that.
 Signature Wes Groleau
He that is good for making excuses, is seldom good for anything else. -- Benjamin Franklin
Marc Heusser - 27 Dec 2006 00:42 GMT > Hi everybody, > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I'd like to use free tools. ...
> Ideally I'd like to have some compressed archive file (a single file) > that I can easily mount from other Unix systems (Linux and OS X) > and easily re-install (either on the same hard disk as the one it > came from or on a new hard disk / Mac / etc.). > > Thanks in advance for pointers, hints, tips and whatnot :) Have a look here: http://www.bombich.com/
HTH
Marc
 Signature Switzerland/Europe <http://www.heusser.com> remove CHEERS and from MERCIAL to get valid e-mail
matt neuburg - 27 Dec 2006 01:10 GMT > I'd like to image/backup the whole OS. I'm not a complete > newbie when it comes to imaging / backuping / templating / > offline-scanning / duplicating (whatever ;) whole OSes... > > I'd like to use free tools. man asr
m.
 Signature matt neuburg, phd = matt@tidbits.com, http://www.tidbits.com/matt/ Tiger - http://www.takecontrolbooks.com/tiger-customizing.html AppleScript - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596102119 Read TidBITS! It's free and smart. http://www.tidbits.com
Bob Harris - 27 Dec 2006 02:33 GMT > Hi everybody, > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Thanks in advance for pointers, hints, tips and whatnot :) Try SuperDuper! Demo mode will do a full bootable copy to an equal or larger sized disk, or partition, or .dmg disk image. Paying the shareware fee gives additional features, but the free mode does the job if that is all you need.
SilverKeeper is free and worth a look.
Carbon Copy Cloner (similar deal to SuperDuper!)
Disk Utility (Applications -> Utilities) can create disk images.
Maybe dd can be used, but I'm not sure about restore, and the low blocks that generally have labels and partition tables. Your mileage may vary.
If you want to get down to things like rsync, cpio, tar, etc... watch out for lost attributes and file name problems (either too long or contains characters not supported by the utility or the destination file system).
This topic comes up every month or so. You might want to do some searches in the Google groups, that might give you additional ideas.
I am currently a SuperDuper! user. It has been very good to me (and I have used many many many backup utilities from writing my own on a PDP-11 based UNIX System V.2 system, VMS BACKUP on VMS systems, cpio, tar, dump, and rsync on Unix type systems, Retrospect on Mac OS and Mac OS X, Carbon Copy Cloner, Silverkeeper, SuperDuper!, etc...).
Bob Harris
Dave Balderstone - 27 Dec 2006 02:37 GMT > Maybe dd can be used, but I'm not sure about restore, and the low > blocks that generally have labels and partition tables. Your > mileage may vary. Mark Conrad can advise on dd...
Jon - 27 Dec 2006 09:18 GMT > Mark Conrad can advise on dd... While we're at it: Will dd run if the Mac runs on 230V, /in the US/ (I mean, it probably does all the time in Europe, but that's all foreign and stuff), and with or without automatic circuit breakers? I haven't seen any serious testing on this. I live in Foreignland, so I'm afraid I can't help, sorry...
 Signature /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc
Dave Balderstone - 27 Dec 2006 12:49 GMT > > Mark Conrad can advise on dd... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > seen any serious testing on this. I live in Foreignland, so I'm afraid I > can't help, sorry... I wish there was a well-written manual for this stuff. I don't understand why someone hasn't written one.
Mark Conrad - 27 Dec 2006 21:26 GMT > While we're at it: Will dd run > if the Mac runs on 230V, in the US... Yes, the only part of the Mac that "sees" the 230 vac is the Mac's power supply.
IMPORTANT NOTE#1: The only Macs in the USA that can use 230 vac are those Macs specifically designed to use 230 vac, such as the big desktop Mac Pro, and some of Apple's portable battery-operated models, like the Intel MacBook line of portables - - - and only then if the computer is plugged into a suitable 230 vac outlet designed for computer use.
IMPORTANT NOTE#2: Some new Mac models, like the newest Intel MacBook line, DO NOT HAVE a separate safety earth-ground. This is a very minor safety oversight on Apple's part, should not result in anyone being fried, under normal circumstances.
The likelihood of electrocution due to this minor oversight could be compared to the likelihood of being eaten by a lion while walking the streets of New York City.
Possible, but not very likely.
This minor safety omission applies to 230 vac operation of the newest Intel MacBook line, when run in Europe, Britain, _and_ when run from 230 vac in the USA.
Back to whether dd will run on a USA Mac using 230 vac -
Yes, dd will run.
All the actual DC voltages going to the modules inside the Mac are the same voltages as if you were running the Mac from 115 vac power.
Peripherals like printers, USB drives, firewire drives, etc. can not tell whether the Mac is powered from 230 vac, or 115 vac.
The only parts of the Mac and peripherals that are "common" with each other electrically, are the external chassis of all the computer gear.
Those external chassis should all be dead cold electrically, and should all be connected to a good low resistance earth ground by house safety-ground wiring installed by a qualified electrician.
As regards the starting post in this thread, I did not see it, am too lazy to dig it out, so do not know what the OP is trying to do.
Mark-
William Mitchell - 28 Dec 2006 02:18 GMT > > While we're at it: Will dd run > > if the Mac runs on 230V, in the US... [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > MacBook line of portables - - - and only then if the computer is plugged > into a suitable 230 vac outlet designed for computer use. Does anyone know when when Apple last sold a computer which wouldn't work on 230? Or anybody else, for that matter? (I just checked the specs on the Mac mini, to be sure.)
> IMPORTANT NOTE#2: > Some new Mac models, like the newest Intel MacBook line, DO NOT HAVE > a separate safety earth-ground. This is a very minor safety oversight > on Apple's part, should not result in anyone being fried, under normal > circumstances. Or abnormal circumstances, either. Even extremely abnormal circumstances, such as have been discussed on this group.
 Signature Bill Mitchell Dept of Mathematics, The University of Florida PO Box 118105, Gainesville, FL 32611--8105 mitchell@math.ufl.edu (352) 392-0281 x284
Mark Conrad - 28 Dec 2006 07:31 GMT > > IMPORTANT NOTE#2: > > Some new Mac models, like the newest Intel MacBook line, DO NOT HAVE [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Or abnormal circumstances, either. Even extremely abnormal > circumstances, such as have been discussed on this group. Yes indeed, especially being the highest voltage on the Intel MacBook is 18.5 volts DC, assuming there is no straight-through short in the power adapter that charges the battery of the MacBook.
Extremely unlikely such a 115 vac short would ever occur, hence Apple's decision to not ground the case of the MacBook.
In fact, the only halfway "reasonable" reason I can think of for grounding the chassis on the MacBook would be if a faulty external peripheral dumped 115 vac onto the MacBook, by way of one of the connecting cables.
Mark-
Wes Groleau - 28 Dec 2006 04:57 GMT > IMPORTANT NOTE#1: Q: How can you bump off a retired engineer and get away with it?
A: Tell a joke and let him talk himself to death clearing up your misconceptions.
 Signature Wes Groleau Genealogical Lookups: http://groleau.freeshell.org/ref/lookups.shtml
Dave Balderstone - 28 Dec 2006 05:37 GMT > > IMPORTANT NOTE#1: > > Q: How can you bump off a retired engineer and get away with it? > > A: Tell a joke and let him talk himself to death clearing up > your misconceptions. What misconceptions? All went according to plan.
;-)
Jon - 28 Dec 2006 20:11 GMT > > While we're at it: Will dd run > > if the Mac runs on 230V, in the US... > > Yes, the only part of the Mac that "sees" the 230 vac is the Mac's power > supply. I don't belive this. OK: THIS WEAS A JOKE. And yes, I know I was shouting right now.
> IMPORTANT NOTE#1: > The only Macs in the USA that can use 230 vac are those Macs > specifically designed to use 230 vac, such as the big desktop Mac Pro, > and some of Apple's portable battery-operated models, like the Intel > MacBook line of portables - - - and only then if the computer is plugged > into a suitable 230 vac outlet designed for computer use. Bull****
> IMPORTANT NOTE#2: > Some new Mac models, like the newest Intel MacBook line, DO NOT HAVE [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Intel MacBook line, when run in Europe, Britain, _and_ when run from > 230 vac in the USA. It applies to all the battery-powered Macs. Period.
> Back to whether dd will run on a USA Mac using 230 vac - > > Yes, dd will run. Wow. See above.
<snip>
 Signature /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc
Mark Conrad - 29 Dec 2006 15:41 GMT > > > While we're at it: Will dd run > > > if the Mac runs on 230V, in the US... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I don't belive this. > OK: THIS WEAS A JOKE. And yes, I know I was shouting right now. In that case, you should make it damn certain that people here understand it was a joke, with smiley emoticons or whatever.
What you posted with your "joke" is equivalent to someone yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre.
If you are not capable of understanding that, consider what _might_ have happened if I posted a short direct answer to your question.
To make this crystal clear to you, your question was:
"While we're at it: Will dd run if the Mac runs on 230V, in the US"
Some naive Mac user might decide to plug in his US Mac into 230 vac and try the dd thing, based on your question and my short answer.
Depending on exactly how the Mac user decided to connect the 230vac source to his Mac, he just might get electrocuted.
For example, he might inadvertently decide to wire one of the two "hot" wires of his 230 vac outlet to the safety ground of a Mac Mini's power plug, which would be very liable to promptly electrocute him if his hand was on the chassis of the Mac.
Any time 230V and operation of a Mac in the US are both mentioned in the same breath as you did, I take it seriously.
There was NO INDICATION that your post was a joke.
Knowledge about safe operation of a Mac with 230V in the US is scarce, so Mac users who don't know any better _might_ be inclined to go off half cocked and experiment with 230V, unless many warnings were posted by people such as myself.
The rest of your post, devoted to short remarks snipping at me such as your "Bull****" do have merit, however you completely missed the point of what I was trying to do, namely to scare the naive US user into being CAREFUL when he/she used 230V.
Safe operation of 230 vac in the USA depends on having a qualified electrician wire up the 230 vac circuit specifically to be used with a Mac, BEFORE any Mac user decides to plug his Mac into the 230 volt outlet.
Some USA electricians might refuse to even supply a 230 vac outlet, based on the contention that the 230 vac outlet for the Mac looks EXACTLY like a 115 vac outlet.
Some house member might mistake it as such, and plug her hair dryer into a live 230 vac outlet intended for the Mac only.
You can imagine the horrible result of doing that.
Mark-
Dave Balderstone - 29 Dec 2006 16:24 GMT > Some USA electricians might refuse to even supply a 230 vac outlet, > based on the contention that the 230 vac outlet for the Mac looks > EXACTLY like a 115 vac outlet. Any electrician who wires a 115V outlet to deliver 230V should be shot. Any non-electrician who wires a 115V outlet to deliver 230V is an imbecile.
Jon - 29 Dec 2006 16:47 GMT > > > > While we're at it: Will dd run > > > > if the Mac runs on 230V, in the US... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > What you posted with your "joke" is equivalent to someone yelling "fire" > in a crowded theatre. It was based on the assumption that any and all who post here would understand that any software that runs on a computer is totally unaware of the voltage supplied to the copmuter's power suppply, _especially_ a self-professed technically interested guy like you. Although I have to admint the joke was at your expense, since you have been posting all sorts of megaweird questions around running Macs on this or that voltage.
Just to make that clear: 1) Macs are genreally sold with power supplies that can take voltages from around 100 to around 240 Volts. Check the spec sheet or the markings on the back. There have been exceptions (recently, the first iMac G5 model, but only the one sold in the US, comes to mind), but those are _exceptions_. AFAIK, all portables have had "universal" power supplies since day 1. 2) All Macs in Europe run on 220-240 Volts, depending on the local wiring scheme, without modifications except for the physical plug. 3) As long as the computer runs, _of course_ dd (like any other piece of software) will run. That is what a computer does when it runs: Executes software.
> If you are not capable of understanding that, consider what _might_ > have happened if I posted a short direct answer to your question. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Some naive Mac user might decide to plug in his US Mac into 230 vac and > try the dd thing, based on your question and my short answer. No, he might not (nobody would be that stupid), and if he did, it would work - provided the 230 V outlet is installed by someone qualified to do it. The point here is "if the Mac runs on 230V". You are questioning that. I am not, as I live in 230V-land. It will and does.
> Depending on exactly how the Mac user decided to connect the 230vac > source to his Mac, he just might get electrocuted. Again, no. Not if he didn't hot-wire the thing himself and messed it up badly, which is not what we are talking about. That might just as well happen with 115V - or with 230 in a 230V country.
> For example, he might inadvertently decide to wire one of the two "hot" > wires of his 230 vac outlet to the safety ground of a Mac Mini's power > plug, which would be very liable to promptly electrocute him if his hand > was on the chassis of the Mac. He might, but that is illegal, amateurish and a lot more, and we are not discussing what might happen to my electric toaster either, if I decided to hook up one of my (230V) "hot" leads to ground on that one.
> Any time 230V and operation of a Mac in the US are both mentioned in the > same breath as you did, I take it seriously. > > There was NO INDICATION that your post was a joke. There is every indication that it was a joke, as what I am saying is patently absurd to anyone _remotely_ informed about the relationship between AC voltage and computer software, i.e., none.
> Knowledge about safe operation of a Mac with 230V in the US is scarce, > so Mac users who don't know any better _might_ be inclined to go off > half cocked and experiment with 230V, unless many warnings were posted > by people such as myself. No. Because NO ONE would ever imagine even trying what you say unless someone like yourself tipped them off to the possibility by posting these totallly imbecile "warnings".
> The rest of your post, devoted to short remarks snipping at me such as > your "Bull****" do have merit, however you completely missed the point > of what I was trying to do, namely to scare the naive US user into being > CAREFUL when he/she used 230V. Why does he/she need that when the US standard is 115V anyway?
> Safe operation of 230 vac in the USA depends on having a qualified > electrician wire up the 230 vac circuit specifically to be used with a > Mac, BEFORE any Mac user decides to plug his Mac into the 230 volt > outlet. EXACTLY.
> Some USA electricians might refuse to even supply a 230 vac outlet, > based on the contention that the 230 vac outlet for the Mac looks > EXACTLY like a 115 vac outlet. Good for them. In Europe, I can get 480V 3~ outlets. They look different and are clarely marked. Are US eletricians not able to that? Comme on!
> Some house member might mistake it as such, and plug her hair dryer into > a live 230 vac outlet intended for the Mac only. Good grief...
> You can imagine the horrible result of doing that. They would almost deserve what they got in that case, IMHO.
 Signature /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc
Mark Conrad - 30 Dec 2006 01:13 GMT > > There was NO INDICATION that your post was a joke. > > There is every indication that it was a joke, as what I am saying is > patently absurd to anyone _remotely_ informed about the relationship > between AC voltage and computer software, i.e., none. I disagree that "none" can be misled by your so-called joke.
People buy Macs, then they plug them in and learn how to manage the software in their Macs.
That in no way prepares them to know anything about the AC power details of their Macs, as you seem to be implying.
The AC voltage end of Macs is a big mystery to a LOT of otherwise proficient Mac users.
For example, in the USA, how many Mac users know the correct answer to these questions:
1) For an Intel Mac Mini Duo, what is the approximate resistance between its chassis and the safety prod of its main power plug, the plug that goes to the wall outlet?
A) Over 100 megohms (open circuit) B) Less than one ohm C) 1,000 ohms
2) When USA Macs are run on 230 vac in the USA, what is the highest AC voltage, plus or minus about 20 volts, with reference to earth ground on ANY of the individual 3 prods of the main power plug, the plug that normally plugs into the wall 115 vac outlet?
A) 230 vac B) 115 vac
3) When USA Macs are run on 115 vac in the USA, what is the highest AC voltage, plus or minus about 20 volts, with reference to earth ground on ANY of the individual 3 prods of the main power plug, the plug that normally plugs into the wall 115 vac outlet?
A) 230 vac B) 115 vac
4) Is it legal in the USA for an electrician to install an extension cord that has a female 115 vac plug on its one end, and a "legal" 230 vac male plug on its other end?
5) Depending on the answer to question four, then is it "legal" to run a Mac in the USA from 230 vac?
(no easy way to hook the Mac to 230 vac, if local electrical codes forbid the installation of a conversion cord)
Now the electrician can get around all that legally, if he is willing to butcher the end of the standard power cord that comes with the Mac Pro, and install a "legal" 230 vac connector in its place.
...but that electrician certainly better know about 230 volt computers, otherwise your expensive Mac Pro might be toasted when you plug it in.
Then the user had better purchase a spare power cord from Apple, in case it becomes necessary to send the Mac in for repair under warranty.
> > The rest of your post...<clip>...does have merit, > > however you completely missed the point of what I was > > trying to do, namely to scare the naive US user into being > > CAREFUL when he/she used 230V. > > Why does he/she need that when the US standard is 115V anyway? BECAUSE, the old wiring in houses built 40 years ago deteriorates, and the wall outlets with their crimped contacts deteriorates, with time.
There are a lot of those old houses, especially in rural areas.
The net result of the old wiring is that wires and outlets heat up, becoming a fire hazard when high currents are involved.
Every year in this rural area, there are local news stories about old houses burning down because of over-loaded oxidized wiring.
That old wiring is technically okay, according to legal grandfather clauses and code enforcement policies.
The local home owner is not inclined to spend thousands of dollars and have his house torn up just to run high current computer gear, especially when he has the option to cut those high currents in half by switching to 230 vac.
Apple's spec's on the Mac Pro state that the "maximum" current is 12 amps when running on 115 vac, with 230 vac that maximum drops to 6 amps, according to Apple.
Argue with Apple about the 12 amp spec', I do not have the details on a fully configured Mac Pro with all the bells and whistles.
Mark-
G.T. - 30 Dec 2006 02:11 GMT > > > There was NO INDICATION that your post was a joke. > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I disagree that "none" can be misled by your so-called joke. Oh Lord.
Greg
Dave Balderstone - 30 Dec 2006 04:40 GMT > > > There was NO INDICATION that your post was a joke. > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I disagree that "none" can be misled by your so-called joke. But Mark, you're a fucktard... You can be misled by a yak farting in Tibet.
Jon - 30 Dec 2006 11:41 GMT > I disagree that "none" can be misled by your so-called joke. The word "none" both grammatically and in terms of contents refers to the _relationship_ (i.e., between AC voltage and the software that runs on the computer): There generally is none. The software on a PC or Mac is blissfully oblivious of external trivialia like that.
 Signature /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc
Mark Conrad - 31 Dec 2006 07:19 GMT > > I disagree that "none" can be misled by your so-called joke. > > The word "none" both grammatically and in terms of contents refers to > the _relationship_ (i.e., between AC voltage and the software that runs > on the computer): There generally is none. The software on a PC or Mac > is blissfully oblivious of external trivialia like that. So if you knew all that, why did you post the following -
"Will dd run if the Mac runs on 230V"
(don't accuse me of taking this out of context, your entire post will appear at the end of my post here)
1) Was it to mislead new Mac users who did not know any better to experiment with trying to run dd along with a Mac running from 230V, and get themselves electrocuted?
2) Your statement:
"I haven't seen any serious testing on this."
Was that intended to encourage new users to do "serious testing" with 230V and get electrocuted?
3) Your statement:
"I live in Foreignland, so I'm afraid I can't help, sorry..."
Was that intended to make your whole miserable post seem authentic, so a new Mac user would be more inclined to experiment and get electrocuted?
It was a dangerous post, I am glad I took it as such, because you gave no indication in your post that it was a joke, instead you RELIED on the dangerous assumption that no new naive user would experiment with 230V, WITHOUT BENEFIT OF ANY WARNINGS OR CAUTIONS FROM YOU.
You made it appear that you did not know if dd would run on a Mac that was powered with 230V with your question:
"Will dd run if the Mac runs on 230V"
Most computer users know that success in running dd or any other application has nothing to do with whether the Mac is running from 115V or 230V, it appeared from your question that you were one of the few who did not know.
I answered your dd question quickly, then got on with the real issue, namely safety when running a Mac in the USA from 230V
dd with 230V is not the issue here, never was, even though you try strenuously to make it the issue, constantly throwing it up as a straw man to distract readers from the real issue here, which of course is safety when using a Mac with 230V in the USA, and your failure to warn users of the hazards of using the Mac in the USA with 230V.
Well, its the holiday season and all, perhaps I have been too hard on you for creating such a dangerous so-called "joke", or perhaps you did it out of sheer ignorance of human nature and human curiosity, plus the tendency of some to experiment with dangerous things that you fail to warn them about.
Mark-
Entire post from Jon:
> Dave Balderstone <dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > seen any serious testing on this. I live in Foreignland, so I'm afraid I > can't help, sorry... Wes Groleau - 30 Dec 2006 14:20 GMT >>> OK: THIS WEAS A JOKE. And yes, I know I was shouting right now. >> In that case, you should make it damn certain that people here [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > of the voltage supplied to the copmuter's power suppply, _especially_ a > self-professed technically interested guy like you. Although I have to As far as I can tell, only one person did not know it was a joke,
>> Some naive Mac user might decide to plug in his US Mac into 230 vac and >> try the dd thing, based on your question and my short answer. As far as I can tell, only one person is considering that.
 Signature Wes Groleau "Ideas are more powerful than guns, We would not let our enemies have guns; why should we let them have ideas?" -- Jozef Stalin
Jon - 30 Dec 2006 22:14 GMT > As far as I can tell, only one person did not know it was a joke, I know, I know... don't feed the troll. I abase myself and promise to stop - I think. ;-)
 Signature /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc
Dave Balderstone - 30 Dec 2006 22:31 GMT > > As far as I can tell, only one person did not know it was a joke, > > I know, I know... don't feed the troll. > I abase myself and promise to stop - I think. ;-) Replying to Mark isn't feeding a troll, exactly. It's more like pretending to throw the ball for a mildly retarded dog, and chuckling as it runs to the back fence, then looks wildly around before coming back to the porch, waiting for you to throw it again.
Jon - 31 Dec 2006 00:04 GMT > > > As far as I can tell, only one person did not know it was a joke, > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > as it runs to the back fence, then looks wildly around before coming > back to the porch, waiting for you to throw it again. Except his stubborn, dogheaded, obnoxious will to always find a problem or a theoretical potential for risk, even when (as in this case) he himself actually has to construct the very apparatus that then _might_ get him into said trouble _if_ only he also misuses and maltreats it, gets to be so _incredibly_ annoying sometimes...
But hey, it's holiday season, New Year tomorrow 'nd all. Cheers! Happy new year!
 Signature /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc
Dave Balderstone - 31 Dec 2006 01:19 GMT > > > > As far as I can tell, only one person did not know it was a joke, > > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > get him into said trouble _if_ only he also misuses and maltreats it, > gets to be so _incredibly_ annoying sometimes... That's why *someone* posts the Mark Conrad FAQ from time-to-time.
I'm seriously going to have to go back to those old archived Compuserve threads when he was "Gerald Smith" and get them on the web. They were a lot of fun, and would sure give people a historical context for the pathology we're dealing with in "Mark Conrad". The Compuserve Sysops eventually isolated him in a forum only he could post to, to make him go away.
The down side is that they drove him to USENET. Bastids...
> But hey, it's holiday season, New Year tomorrow 'nd all. > Cheers! Happy new year! Damn Straight! Although we're still about 28.75 hours away from 2007 here.
Merry, happy!
Eric Lindsay - 31 Dec 2006 12:56 GMT > > But hey, it's holiday season, New Year tomorrow 'nd all. > > Cheers! Happy new year! [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Merry, happy! Happy New Year (1.1 hours away for us). And it is raining! But mostly in offshore waters, and not in the dam.
 Signature http://www.ericlindsay.com
Jon - 31 Dec 2006 16:46 GMT > > > But hey, it's holiday season, New Year tomorrow 'nd all. > > > Cheers! Happy new year! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Happy New Year (1.1 hours away for us). And it is raining! But mostly in > offshore waters, and not in the dam. Still over six hours away here. Suddenly turned cold, clear and crisp again after a couple of days of highly unseasonal rain. Means we actually get to _see_ the fireworks, not just hear them. :-)
 Signature /Jon For contact info, run the following in Terminal: Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc
Mark Conrad - 30 Dec 2006 21:58 GMT > The point here is "if the Mac runs on 230V". You are questioning > that. I am not, as I live in 230V-land. It will and does. <sigh> - it was patently obvious by the context of my remark you refer to that I meant "when" the Mac runs on 230V, not "if".
I also posted "If the Mac runs on 115V"
Is that supposed to mean that I am questioning whether the Mac is capable of running on 115 vac, c'mon!
> > For example, he might inadvertently decide to wire one of the two "hot" > > wires of his 230 vac outlet to the safety ground of a Mac Mini's power > > plug, which would be very liable to promptly electrocute him if his hand > > was on the chassis of the Mac. > > He might, but that is illegal, amateurish and a lot more,...<snip>... You got that right, however by reading my posts he would KNOW that he was screwing up, because of all the warnings in my posts about using qualified electricians and what might happen if he does not.
> > Knowledge about safe operation of a Mac with 230V in the US is scarce, > > so Mac users who don't know any better _might_ be inclined to go off [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > someone like yourself tipped them off to the possibility by posting > these totallly imbecile "warnings". Here we go, the old "Keep them in the dark and they will not screw up" argument I hear so often in these NGs.
I don't buy that at all.
A much better attitude, IMO, would be to alert people to hazards.
If you have a child, you DO NOT keep that child in ignorance about the hazards of crossing a street, based on some weird supposition that the child will not get killed if you keep him in ignorance.
You tell him to cross the street ONLY when the crossing guard (electrician) is present at the intersection.
...and you warn him what might happen if he does otherwise, in fact you might exaggerate a little about the perils, as I did in my posts.
Continuing to spread knowledge and enlighten people, here are the answers to the recent mini-quiz about input power basics for Macs:
1) 1,000 ohms 2) 115 vac (measured by a voltmeter to earth ground) 3) 115 vac (measured by a voltmeter to earth ground) 4) No, not legal 5) Could be legal, depends on installation technique
"No" if a separate 115V to 230V cord is built.
"Yes" if the standard cord sold with Macs in the US has its 115V source plug removed, and a legal 230V male plug installed by a person qualified to do the job.
You _could_ check with Apple ahead of time, tell them what you plan to do and why, ask them for details about how the proposed modification affects EULA, warranty, and repair issues.
I did, and I was assured that my EULA, my 3 year extended warranty, and any repair issues would not be adversely affected by my proposed operation from a 230 vac source.
Let me warn anyone who phones Apple on this matter. Be prepared to be bounced around for hours between sales, customer service, technical support, and other sections of Apple before you manage to contact anyone at Apple who can answer your questions with any degree of intelligence.
One guy from technical support with a heavy Indian accent even insisted that a Mac would not run from 230 vac.
After two hours on the phone, I FINALLY got an Apple rep' who told it like it was.
He advised:
1) Remove 115 vac power plug from standard Mac power cable 2) Install "legal" 230 vac male twist-lock plug in its place 3) Plug Mac into a "legal" 230 vac UPS, enjoy Mac 4) Buy spare standard Mac power cable from Apple store, tell them your dog ate your original cable.
He also said my EULA, warranty, repairs, would not be adversely affected, especially if I did not tell Apple I was running from 230 vac
That from an Apple rep' <g>
Now for my usual warning, I know you love these warnings.
PLEASE people, if you have a need for 230V operation, have a licensed electrician modify the Mac power cable, an electrician who is also familiar with Mac input power requirements.
There is too much to lose if you do it yourself and screw up, human lives are involved here.
Mark-
Randy Howard - 29 Dec 2006 19:03 GMT > What you posted with your "joke" is equivalent to someone yelling "fire" > in a crowded theatre. OMG.
> If you are not capable of understanding that, consider what _might_ > have happened if I posted a short direct answer to your question. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Depending on exactly how the Mac user decided to connect the 230vac > source to his Mac, he just might get electrocuted. Darwin wins again. Anyone taking electrical advice from Usenet needs to be reminded in real world physical terms how stupid they are.
> For example, he might inadvertently decide to wire one of the two "hot" > wires of his 230 vac outlet to the safety ground of a Mac Mini's power [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > There was NO INDICATION that your post was a joke. Get a grip.
 Signature Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR) "The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
Ian Gregory - 27 Dec 2006 06:29 GMT > I'd like to image/backup the whole OS. I'm not a complete > newbie when it comes to imaging / backuping / templating / > offline-scanning / duplicating (whatever ;) whole OSes... > > I'd like to use free tools. Another good thing to read is:
http://developer.apple.com/macosx/backuponmacosx.html
Ian
 Signature Ian Gregory http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/
|
|
|