Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Country Specific / UK Mac Group / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Now that's just silly

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve Firth - 23 May 2008 00:07 GMT
WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
need to be plugged into both Firewire (400 only) and USB ports because
they use USB bus power, not Firewire.

Huh?

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/22/wd_firewire_vs_usb/
Woody - 23 May 2008 00:52 GMT
> WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/22/wd_firewire_vs_usb/

£134 or $130??? Did they get that bit right?

Signature

Woody

www.alienrat.com

Stephen - 23 May 2008 02:29 GMT
> > WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> > interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> www.alienrat.com

It comes with a Firewire cable that has a 6-pin FW400 plug at the
computer end, and both FW and mini-USB connection at the other.
Peter Ceresole - 23 May 2008 09:52 GMT
> It comes with a Firewire cable that has a 6-pin FW400 plug at the
> computer end, and both FW and mini-USB connection at the other.

And doesn't that mean that as far as the mac is concerned, it's a single
FW connector?

As I read it, the USB bit is strictly at the drive end of the cable.
Signature

Peter

Chris Ridd - 23 May 2008 06:40 GMT
> WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/22/wd_firewire_vs_usb/

I didn't think that could be right either, so I checked WD. They say:

"FireWire or USB powered - No separate power supply is needed.* "
"* An optional cable is available for the few computers that limit USB power. "

That's pretty standard.

I couldn't see anything to contradict that *except* that the drawings
of the "Firewire" cable in the manual all seemed to have two plugs on
one end...

Cheers,

Chris
Jim - 23 May 2008 07:07 GMT
> WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/22/wd_firewire_vs_usb/

Keep in mind that where El Reg[0] is concerned all bets on accuracy are
off.

Jim
[0] "Integrity? We've heard of it."
Signature

'Cloverfield' in nine words: "What is it?!" "We're gonna die!" BOOM!
Roll credits.

http://www.ursaminorbeta.co.uk   http://twitter.com/greyareauk

Phillip Walters - 23 May 2008 10:16 GMT
> WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/22/wd_firewire_vs_usb/

Update
WD has since got back to us to state that the drive uses USB 2.0 and a
four-pin Firewire port at the drive end of the cable, not at the host
end, where it connects using a six-pin Firewire. We're happy to clarify
the point - though perhaps WD should have made this approach to
connectivity more clear on its own website?

Signature

Phil

http://www.philwalters.co.uk

Steve Firth - 23 May 2008 11:18 GMT
> > WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> > interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> the point - though perhaps WD should have made this approach to
> connectivity more clear on its own website?

That's still slightly bizarre, but better than it seemed at first plonk.
Although I think I'll still be looking elsewhere for portable storage.
Phillip Walters - 23 May 2008 11:36 GMT
> > > WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> > > interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> That's still slightly bizarre, but better than it seemed at first plonk.
> Although I think I'll still be looking elsewhere for portable storage.

How about this ?
http://www.kellysquotes.co.uk/industrial/storage-containers-uk/qz_questi
ons_1020z.jhtml?_requestid=20191
Signature

Phil

http://www.philwalters.co.uk

Steve Firth - 23 May 2008 11:52 GMT
> > > > WD have launched a range of pocket, bus-powered Firewire drives. I was
> > > > interested right up until I read The Register's article on them - they
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> http://www.kellysquotes.co.uk/industrial/storage-containers-uk/qz_questi
> ons_1020z.jhtml?_requestid=20191

I already have several, they don't fit in the briefcase. And the
briefcase looks a little lost inside one.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.