>Yes. When did we get 3.06 as a measurement.
> >Yes. When did we get 3.06 as a measurement.
>
> It's because they're multiples of 133MHz.
>
> 2.4 = 18x, 2.66 = 20x, 2.8 = 21x, 3.06 = 23x.
Still, 3 would sound a lot better than 3.06

Signature
Woody
www.alienrat.com
Pd - 07 May 2008 09:14 GMT
> > >Yes. When did we get 3.06 as a measurement.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Still, 3 would sound a lot better than 3.06
Yebbut, it's important to be able to say "the processor runs at *over* 3
GHz".

Signature
Pd
Woody - 07 May 2008 17:55 GMT
> > > >Yes. When did we get 3.06 as a measurement.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Yebbut, it's important to be able to say "the processor runs at *over* 3
> GHz".
I guess it probably does!

Signature
Woody
www.alienrat.com