I was just thinking: it must be expensive for Apple to keep providing
universal binary support for new software / operating systems.
I suspect the only reason they introduced it was to stop people who
own f.cking slow G4s and G5s from BAAAWING about obsolete hardware.
Suppose 10.6 is called Lion. I reckon they'll say, right, you must
have an Intel 8.0 GHz Core Qaudro minimum with 4 Gigs of Ram to run
it. And they'll say the clock speed of the fastest G5 is too f.cking
slow to run OS X Lion.
I mean they have to stop sometime, right? Surely all that sh.t is
taking up double the space on my hard drive? For instance I have
Office 2008. I bet there's code there for both PowerPC and Intel.
Well, guess what mother-f.cker? I don't want the PowerPC code eating
up my disk space.
J. J. Lodder - 06 May 2008 10:07 GMT
> I was just thinking: it must be expensive for Apple to keep providing
> universal binary support for new software / operating systems.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Well, guess what mother-f.cker? I don't want the PowerPC code eating
> up my disk space.
Stop f.cking your mother.
Diskspace costs next nothing these days,
(on the way to 0.10 euro/GB)
And worrying about it is a waste of your time
(unless your time is worth nothing)
Jan
childish.chris@googlemail.com - 06 May 2008 12:39 GMT
> <childish.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was just thinking: it must be expensive for Apple to keep providing
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Jan
I stand corrected. You have a very good point.
I still get a shock when I see how cheap a 4GB USB flash drive is, for
example.
Fry - 06 May 2008 10:53 GMT
> I have
> Office 2008. I bet there's code there for both PowerPC and Intel.
> Well, guess what mother-f.cker? I don't want the PowerPC code eating
> up my disk space.
http://www.xslimmer.com/
Also available as part of the MacHeist bundle: www.macheist.com