Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Country Specific / UK Mac Group / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PCI cards for a G5...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Andy Hewitt - 04 May 2008 09:09 GMT
I think I'm having trouble with the USB hub I have here, so on the hunt
for a replacment. I'm considering a PCI card instead. However, the last
one I got (a generic PC card) did work, but caused sleeping problems.

Doing a bit of research makes me wonder, my G5 has the PCI-X slots, how
backwards compatible are these slots? They are specified at 100MHz for
slots 2 & 3, and 133MHz for slot 4.

The manual only gives data for fitting slower cards into the standard
PCI slots at 33MHz, stating that 66MHz cards can be used as long as they
are capable of runing at 33MHz.

No such information seems to be available for the PCI-X slots. Most of
the USB cards I can find are only 33MHz, although they are 3.3v, which
is the preferred voltage on the G5.

Anybody got a clearer idea of what cards can actually be used in the
PCI-X slots? Can they switch down to lower MHz cards?

Cheers.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Jaimie Vandenbergh - 04 May 2008 11:24 GMT
>I think I'm having trouble with the USB hub I have here, so on the hunt
>for a replacment. I'm considering a PCI card instead. However, the last
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>backwards compatible are these slots? They are specified at 100MHz for
>slots 2 & 3, and 133MHz for slot 4.

The PCI-X standard mandates backwards compatibility with ye olde 33MHz
cards. It doesn't mandate 5V compatibility though - and that is shown
by the physical slot cutouts, a 5V card won't fit into a 3.3V-only
slot.

>Anybody got a clearer idea of what cards can actually be used in the
>PCI-X slots? Can they switch down to lower MHz cards?

So the answer is "they damn well should do or they're not PCI-X", but
there's always the possibility that Apple might have Thought
Differently.

    Cheers - Jaimie
Signature

"If I'd been the Green Goblin,  I'd have got a big bath and lured
Spiderman into it, and being a spider he wouldn't have been able
to climb out. Muahahaha."                     -- Paul Clark, urs

Chris Ridd - 04 May 2008 11:40 GMT
> So the answer is "they damn well should do or they're not PCI-X", but
> there's always the possibility that Apple might have Thought
> Differently.

It is worth reading the Developer Note for the appropriate model Mac to
get this kind of information. Start about here:

<http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/>

At some point you'll start to curse Apple for not making it easy to
distinguish between versions of identical-looking kit...

Cheers,

Chris
Andy Hewitt - 04 May 2008 11:54 GMT
> > So the answer is "they damn well should do or they're not PCI-X", but
> > there's always the possibility that Apple might have Thought
> > Differently.

Well, I did wonder. It's only because, a) I had trouble using a standard
PCI 33MHz card, and b) they don't mention the lower speeds for PCI-X in
the manual, but they do for PCI.

> It is worth reading the Developer Note for the appropriate model Mac to
> get this kind of information. Start about here:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> At some point you'll start to curse Apple for not making it easy to
> distinguish between versions of identical-looking kit...

Thanks, I'll have a go at that then.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Jaimie Vandenbergh - 04 May 2008 11:55 GMT
>> So the answer is "they damn well should do or they're not PCI-X", but
>> there's always the possibility that Apple might have Thought
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>At some point you'll start to curse Apple for not making it easy to
>distinguish between versions of identical-looking kit...

Heh. Still, take the MSKB - they always have "This article applies
to..." lists, but they don't update the bloody things for later
releases of software/OS so you still can't trust them. If Apple did
the same thing with their notes, I'm sure they wouldn't do any better.

http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1307.html states that "These
slots are compliant with the PCI-X Addendum to the PCI Local Bus
Specification, rev. 1.0b." which means they will talk 33MHz, 3.3V.

    Cheers - Jaimie
Signature

"I love the way that Microsoft follows standards.
In much the same manner as fish follow migrating caribou."
                                              - Paul Tomblin, ASR

Andy Hewitt - 04 May 2008 11:58 GMT
> >> So the answer is "they damn well should do or they're not PCI-X", but
> >> there's always the possibility that Apple might have Thought
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> slots are compliant with the PCI-X Addendum to the PCI Local Bus
> Specification, rev. 1.0b." which means they will talk 33MHz, 3.3V.

Thanks Jaimie. That's cleared that up then :-).

Just wanted to be sure before purchasing another card.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Andy Hewitt - 04 May 2008 17:29 GMT
Ok, so I can no identify suitable PCI cards for the G5 - the 5v and 3.3v
ones are quite clearly obviouse now.

There are shed loads on eBay, but I'm still wary of these. However, I'm
also sure my current (Trust) hub is playing up too.

I need to plug in at least 6 extra USB devices. One of these is my UPS,
which obviously needs USB power after a power failure, so needs to be
plugged into the Mac directly really.

If I went the PCI card route, are there any problems with fitting two
identical cards, or should I fit two from different vendors (say a VIA
one and an NEC one).

Cheers

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Chris Ridd - 04 May 2008 17:41 GMT
> Ok, so I can no identify suitable PCI cards for the G5 - the 5v and 3.3v
> ones are quite clearly obviouse now.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> identical cards, or should I fit two from different vendors (say a VIA
> one and an NEC one).

I wouldn't have thought that would be a problem. What sort of current
is each of your devices going to draw from the USB port, and how much
current can a single PCI card provide?

Cheers,

Chris
Andy Hewitt - 04 May 2008 17:58 GMT
[..]
> > If I went the PCI card route, are there any problems with fitting two
> > identical cards, or should I fit two from different vendors (say a VIA
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> is each of your devices going to draw from the USB port, and how much
> current can a single PCI card provide?

I was thinking more of the identity of the cards. Current shouldn't be a
problem, most things are self powered. The media card reader, iMic,
EyeTV Hybrid and keyboard are USB powered.

I could easily share those between the cards and the original ports.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Jaimie Vandenbergh - 04 May 2008 23:33 GMT
>I need to plug in at least 6 extra USB devices. One of these is my UPS,
>which obviously needs USB power after a power failure, so needs to be
>plugged into the Mac directly really.

Wait, what? The UPS will be running of its own battery, as will
(presumably) the Mac. It certainly won't be pulling power from the Mac
via USB.

    Cheers - Jaimie
Signature

Women's breasts are like electric train sets. They're meant for
kids, but usually it's the fathers who wind up playing with them.

Andy Hewitt - 05 May 2008 00:30 GMT
> >I need to plug in at least 6 extra USB devices. One of these is my UPS,
> >which obviously needs USB power after a power failure, so needs to be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> (presumably) the Mac. It certainly won't be pulling power from the Mac
> via USB.

No, it'll need power to the USB just for communications, otherwise the
Mac doesn't know it's on UPS power does it. If I stick it through a hub
that has its own power, it'll lose comms when the power to the USB hub
fails (the hub isn't on a UPS powered socket), and thus the G5 won't
know to shutdown before the battery runs down.

The best way to ensure this, is to connect the USB link for the UPS to a
USB port that will stay live when only the UPS is powering the system -
i.e. a built-in USB port on the G5.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Jaimie Vandenbergh - 05 May 2008 10:40 GMT
>> >I need to plug in at least 6 extra USB devices. One of these is my UPS,
>> >which obviously needs USB power after a power failure, so needs to be
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>No, it'll need power to the USB just for communications, otherwise the
>Mac doesn't know it's on UPS power does it.

Yes, it will - it's not a dead-man-switch connection, the UPS actually
talks data to the computer. Battery life, mains status, depends on
what the UPS mfr makes available.

> If I stick it through a hub
>that has its own power, it'll lose comms when the power to the USB hub
>fails (the hub isn't on a UPS powered socket), and thus the G5 won't
>know to shutdown before the battery runs down.

(I would recommend putting the USB hub on a UPS-powered socket, since
it hardly draws any juice and at some point you'll discover that
you've got your mouse and/or keyboard through it, thanks to Murphy)

>The best way to ensure this, is to connect the USB link for the UPS to a
>USB port that will stay live when only the UPS is powering the system -
>i.e. a built-in USB port on the G5.

That's definitely true, but for not for the reason you have in the
first para.

    Cheers - Jaimie
Signature

"I have an asteroid named after me.  Isaac Asimov's got one too.
It's smaller and more eccentric."           -- Arthur C. Clarke

Andy Hewitt - 05 May 2008 11:13 GMT
> >> Wait, what? The UPS will be running of its own battery, as will
> >> (presumably) the Mac. It certainly won't be pulling power from the Mac
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> talks data to the computer. Battery life, mains status, depends on
> what the UPS mfr makes available.

So if I don't plug in the USB cable, my Mac will still know it's
connected to a UPS?

> > If I stick it through a hub
> >that has its own power, it'll lose comms when the power to the USB hub
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it hardly draws any juice and at some point you'll discover that
> you've got your mouse and/or keyboard through it, thanks to Murphy)

Hmm, good point.

> >The best way to ensure this, is to connect the USB link for the UPS to a
> >USB port that will stay live when only the UPS is powering the system -
> >i.e. a built-in USB port on the G5.
>
> That's definitely true, but for not for the reason you have in the
> first para.

I still don't see why not?

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Jaimie Vandenbergh - 05 May 2008 11:51 GMT
>> >> Wait, what? The UPS will be running of its own battery, as will
>> >> (presumably) the Mac. It certainly won't be pulling power from the Mac
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>So if I don't plug in the USB cable, my Mac will still know it's
>connected to a UPS?

Let's start again...

You have a UPS. You plug the Mac into the UPS power outlet. The Mac is
now protected from short-term mains outages.

You also connect the USB cable from the UPS to the Mac. The USB cable
allows the UPS to inform the Mac when the power is out, by sending a
data packet that the Mac is listening for. It also allows the Mac to
ask the UPS how much battery is available, and so on. This can be a
direct cable, or indirect through a hub.

The mains power goes out.

If a hub was in use, and it was not powered from the UPS, the Mac will
now no longer be able to monitor/recieve info from the UPS - this
would generally be non-optimal but not fatal.

If the USB comms between UPS and Mac are still in place, the UPS sends
a packet over USB to the Mac saying "I've switched to battery mode".
The Mac then does whatever comes naturally - usually this would be to
not worry until the UPS reports less than 10% battery left, at which
point to shut down.

So at no point does the UPS require 5V@.5A from the Mac's USB cable to
function. Only the data transfer wires are used.

I suppose the UPS *could* attempt to monitor when the Mac has powered
down by watching the USB 5V wire, but I've never seen one that did -
and the UPS doesn't care anyway. It wouldn't be reliable either, since
most mains-powered computers hold 5V on the USB power wire even when
they're nominally powered off.

>> > If I stick it through a hub
>> >that has its own power, it'll lose comms when the power to the USB hub
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>I still don't see why not?

Hopefully that clears it up!

    Cheers - Jaimie
Signature

"Once you adopt the unix paradigm, the variants cease to be a problem - you
bitch, of course, but that's because bitching is fun, unlike M$ OS's, where
bitching is required to keep your head from exploding." - S Stremler in afc

Andy Hewitt - 05 May 2008 12:11 GMT
[..]
> >So if I don't plug in the USB cable, my Mac will still know it's
> >connected to a UPS?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You have a UPS. You plug the Mac into the UPS power outlet. The Mac is
> now protected from short-term mains outages.

Yup.

> You also connect the USB cable from the UPS to the Mac. The USB cable
> allows the UPS to inform the Mac when the power is out, by sending a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The mains power goes out.

Yup.

> If a hub was in use, and it was not powered from the UPS, the Mac will
> now no longer be able to monitor/recieve info from the UPS - this
> would generally be non-optimal but not fatal.

So far.

> If the USB comms between UPS and Mac are still in place, the UPS sends
> a packet over USB to the Mac saying "I've switched to battery mode".
> The Mac then does whatever comes naturally - usually this would be to
> not worry until the UPS reports less than 10% battery left, at which
> point to shut down.

Right. So if the USB has lost communication, how does the Mac know that
there's only X% of battery left, or that it's been running on UPS for
X-minutes?

I guess this might depend on the hub, and whether it'll transmit data
without being powered. I don't think the one I have does so.

> So at no point does the UPS require 5V@.5A from the Mac's USB cable to
> function. Only the data transfer wires are used.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> most mains-powered computers hold 5V on the USB power wire even when
> they're nominally powered off.

Erm, yes, actually I know the UPS doesn't care what's happening, it the
Mac I'm interested in. How does it know what's going on if the USB link
is dropped?

Obviously it might know the power was restored if peripherals regained
connection.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Graham J - 05 May 2008 12:38 GMT
> [..]
>> >So if I don't plug in the USB cable, my Mac will still know it's
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> there's only X% of battery left, or that it's been running on UPS for
> X-minutes?

IT DOESN'T !!
IT DOESN'T !!
IT DOESN'T !!
IT DOESN'T !!

Hence the need to maintain the communication between the UPS and the Mac.
Either power the USB hub from the UPS or connect the UPS signal cable DIRECT
to a USB port on the Mac.

-- Graham J
Andy Hewitt - 05 May 2008 13:18 GMT
> IT DOESN'T !!
> IT DOESN'T !!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Either power the USB hub from the UPS or connect the UPS signal cable DIRECT
> to a USB port on the Mac.

Yes, that's how I was understanding it.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Jaimie Vandenbergh - 05 May 2008 14:00 GMT
>> IT DOESN'T !!
>> IT DOESN'T !!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Yes, that's how I was understanding it.

Jolly good, then all is well.

    Cheers - Jaimie
Signature

My swerver room, my patch panels. By the time they figure out why none of the
ports on their floor box work anymore I'll be done, dusted and down the pub
with a pint of something brewed with yeast that was smarter than they are.
                                                   -- Matt S Trout, asr

Rowland McDonnell - 05 May 2008 02:15 GMT
> Ok, so I can no identify suitable PCI cards for the G5 - the 5v and 3.3v
> ones are quite clearly obviouse now.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> identical cards, or should I fit two from different vendors (say a VIA
> one and an NEC one).

I'd go for a hub if I were you.

I've had trouble from plug-in cards on Macs.  Don't trust 'em at all.
Don't like kernel panics.

Rowland.

Signature

Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@dog.physics.org
                                           Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org                             http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker?   Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

Andy Hewitt - 05 May 2008 08:40 GMT
> > Ok, so I can no identify suitable PCI cards for the G5 - the 5v and 3.3v
> > ones are quite clearly obviouse now.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> I've had trouble from plug-in cards on Macs.  Don't trust 'em at all.
> Don't like kernel panics.

Aye, I've had trouble with waking from sleep, although no kernel panics
from them (I'm not denying the possibility though). However, I've also
had trouble with hubs too - which is the current situation I have.

I have recently been getting bother with my media card reader not
working correctly, where it will load a card into the OS, but then
refuse to download any images. If I plug it directly into a built-in
port, it works OK.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.