Hi all,
Not for the first time I have been frustrated by one of Finder's less
endearing features: if you are copying files from one place to another
and the copy process runs into problems, Finder just bombs out and you
are left with an incomplete copy and no simple way to figure out how
successful the copy was.
Which led me to think about what I would want to happen. Really, what
would be good would be to have a way to "park" problem files somewhere
- perhaps in a parallel folder structure - and continue with the copy
operation. Then at the end, produce a log of failed copies.
So, with that in mind:
a) Does anyone know of a program that will do something like this,
particularly across networks (and between Mac and Windows file
systems). Does ChronoSync do this kind of thing?
b) Is this something that is amenable to scripting?
Thanks for any advice,
Ian.
--
Jim - 01 May 2008 12:10 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Thanks for any advice,
Compress the files into a single archive. Punt it over the network. Expand
at destination?
Hardly ideal but it might work. Or it might fail on expanding.
Jim

Signature
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK
"Don't you *dare* use the word 'party' as a verb in this shop!"
-- Bernard Black, 'Black Books'
Graham J - 01 May 2008 12:33 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Thanks for any advice,
On Windows, I would use a command line - something as simple as Xcopy, or
possibly Robocopy.
You can set options to continue in the face of errors, and send the console
output to a log file so you can see what went wrong. With Robocopy, you can
see the console output and write to a log file at the same time.
Since the Mac is based on Linux, there must be a similar command line
facility.
-- Graham J
Jim - 01 May 2008 12:45 GMT
> Since the Mac is based on Linux,...
er...no it isn't.
Jim

Signature
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK
"Don't you *dare* use the word 'party' as a verb in this shop!"
-- Bernard Black, 'Black Books'
James Dore - 01 May 2008 14:12 GMT
> > Since the Mac is based on Linux,...
>
> er...no it isn't.
Tee-Hee! Those poor BSD guys must feel like the kid who has his hand up
but never gets asked the question.
Anyway, to answer the op's question, rcp or scp in a Terminal window
will help you. man rcp or man scp for info.

Signature
james dore
IT Officer,
New College, Oxford
http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/ it-support@new....
Jaimie Vandenbergh - 01 May 2008 14:18 GMT
>> > Since the Mac is based on Linux,...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Anyway, to answer the op's question, rcp or scp in a Terminal window
>will help you. man rcp or man scp for info.
rsync is a bucketload better at reporting failures than the more
venerable *cp, IME.
Cheers - Jaimie

Signature
I was most impressed when I looked up into the London sky and saw
a star through all the light pollution. A few of us checked some
astronomy references to try and identify it, and we're reasonably
confident that it was Sol. -- Peter Corlett, asr
J. J. Lodder - 01 May 2008 15:33 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Thanks for any advice,
You can use a synchronize utility to compare the folders
in case there was trouble.
Or, if you are paranoid:
always use synchronization instead of Finder copy,
(and do it twice just to be surer than sure)
Jan