 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Mac Forum / Country Specific / UK Mac Group / July 2007.dmg from versiontracker corrupt?
Downloaded with Safari:- HandBrake-0.8.5b1-MacOS_UB_GUI.dmg three times tonight from Versiontracker and each time the dmg refuses to mount, giving me a "corrupt image" warning. Presumably lots of people download this successfully, so Is this likely to be a problem with my system? MDD G4, 10.3.9 Kit > Downloaded with Safari:- > HandBrake-0.8.5b1-MacOS_UB_GUI.dmg [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to be a problem with my system? > MDD G4, 10.3.9 Ah! (red face) HandBrake-0.8.5b1-MacOS_UB_GUI.dmg appears to be for 10.4 only... there is a CLI version for 10.3.9 However, in my defernce, Versiontracker does say This product is designed to run on the following operating systems: Mac OS X 10.3.9 Mac OS X 10.4 PPC Mac OS X 10.4 Intel on the same page that it has this version (HandBrake-0.8.5b1-MacOS_UB_GUI.dmg) for download. As an aside... Although I realise that an app for 10.4 may not run on 10.3, I was surprised that the dmg wouldn't mount. Does a dmg created on 10.4 not mount on 10.3?? Kit >Downloaded with Safari:- > HandBrake-0.8.5b1-MacOS_UB_GUI.dmg [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >to be a problem with my system? >MDD G4, 10.3.9 Works fine for me, MB 10.4.10/firefox 2. The download is only 5meg (5226945bytes) rather than the 5.2 that Versiontracker says it is, though. If you CRC32 it (eg Verify it with Disk Utility), the CRC32 should be B7B6E3AE. Cheers - Jaimie  Signature"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." - Galileo Galilei >The download is only 5meg >(5226945bytes) rather than the 5.2 that Versiontracker says it is, "15.2", shouldabeen. I'm sure this bt keyboard is dropping characters. Cheers - J SignatureA: Think about it. Come on, you can figure it out. A:>> When half the group posts top and the other half posts bottom. Q:>>> What's even more annoying than topposting? Q:> Why would that be annoying? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.