Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Country Specific / UK Mac Group / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Launchbar 4.3

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve Hodgson - 30 Jul 2007 22:45 GMT
I've just spotted that Launchbar 4.3 is now available. It seems they
skipped 4.2 although it was (available as a beta for a while) because
of the number of new features. The most obvious difference is is a
Leopard feel to the bar itself.

I recently switched back to Quicksilver largely because of the ability
to access application menus directly from typing the name of the
command rather than having to remember the shortcut. I will try
Launchbar again because I do like its smaller footprint and it always
felt more responsive although not as capable as QS.
Signature

Cheers,

Steve

The reply-to email address is a spam trap.
Email steve 'at' shodgson 'dot' org 'dot' uk

Woody - 30 Jul 2007 23:22 GMT
> I've just spotted that Launchbar 4.3 is now available. It seems they
> skipped 4.2 although it was (available as a beta for a while) because
> of the number of new features. The most obvious difference is is a
> Leopard feel to the bar itself.

Ooh thanks - I will give it a try

> I recently switched back to Quicksilver largely because of the ability
> to access application menus directly from typing the name of the
> command rather than having to remember the shortcut.

I had the oposite. I didn't like haing to type the name of the command
rather than my choice of letters!

> I will try
> Launchbar again because I do like its smaller footprint and it always
> felt more responsive although not as capable as QS.

I found QS a bit sluggish, although that was on a slower machine than
this.

Signature

Woody

www.alienrat.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.