>> I'm happy to announce the release of the Perl Dev Kit 7.0 Beta 2.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>System Requirements
> * Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" or later
quoth Jan Dubois:
> quoth kurtz le pirate:
> > quoth Jan Dubois:
> > > I'm happy to announce the release of the Perl
Dev
> > > Kit 7.0 Beta 2.
> > >
http://www.activestate.com/products/perl_dev_kit/beta.plex
> > seems attractive but :
> > System Requirements
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ActivePerl itself, and not that you need build 816
> or later. I think ActivePerl is really only
"required"
> for the PerlApp program; both the Filter Builder
> and the Code Coverage tool should work with the
> Apple Perl.
If I had to guess, the objection may be to requiring
ActivePerl itself, not in opposition to Apple's Perl
specifically, but in opposition to any other Perl. A
number of people on this list have traditional
`./configure && make && make install` Perls or Fink
Perls installed and configured for their needs.
Live well,
~wren
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
Jan Dubois - 03 Feb 2007 00:29 GMT
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:01:19 -0800 (PST), wren ng thornton
<phreelance@yahoo.com> wrote:
>If I had to guess, the objection may be to requiring
>ActivePerl itself, not in opposition to Apple's Perl
>specifically, but in opposition to any other Perl. A
>number of people on this list have traditional
>`./configure && make && make install` Perls or Fink
>Perls installed and configured for their needs.
I understand, but this is in general not possible. The Perl Dev Kit
contains C code that embeds the Perl interpreter, or provides XS
functionality. All this code must be compiled with the same build
options as the version of Perl you are going to use it with.
You run into the same problem if you compile Perl yourself e.g. without
thread support, and then expect that modules from the Apple Perl tree
will work with your Perl. They won't; you will have to recompile those
modules with your Perl too, so that the XS code gets compiled with the
correct options.
As I hinted at in my previous message, if you compiled your Perl with
the same options as ActivePerl (which uses the same options as Apple
Perl), then things will most likely work. But from a support point of
view, we have to say: any problem that cannot be reproduced with
ActivePerl will not be treated as a Perl Dev Kit bug but as a local
configuration problem.
Essentially: If you know what you are doing, then you can probably get
most stuff working with your own Perl. But if you don't understand why
something breaks, when it breaks, then you are better of using the
"supported combination" of ActivePerl and the Perl Dev Kit.
Cheers,
-Jan
Kurtz Le Pirate - 03 Feb 2007 12:31 GMT
> quoth Jan Dubois:
> > quoth kurtz le pirate:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> `./configure && make && make install` Perls or Fink
> Perls installed and configured for their needs.
yes, not activeperl itself, not build xxx...
i work with v5.8.8 on 10.3.9. the latest version of perl that i have
installed, compiled and configured for panther on /usr/local/bin/perl.
standard perl on panther is 5.8.1 on /usr/bin/perl
so, activeperl it's just an OTHER perl !

Signature
klp
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:06:10 +0100, kurtz le pirate
> <kurtzlepirate@yahoo.fr> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Cheers,
> -Jan
I do not find that objectionable. It would be nice to be able to use
"Perl" but the Dev Kit is your application and you should get to set the
parameters of its usage.
Robert