me too,
ok, now, with no sdk options, build perl is ok.
#./configure ....
#make
...
Everything is up to date. Type 'make test' to run test suite.
#make test
...
All tests successful.
u=3.97 s=3.49 cu=216.67 cs=71.70 scripts=931 tests=117291
#
...but I did not pay attention to the installation prefix and, because i
was on my "downloaded folder", perl was build here :((
#perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.1-RC3 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
...
#/Users/admin/Downloaded/devel/perl/perl-5.8.8/perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-2level
...
shame on me !
any chance to repair that ?
thanks

Signature
klp
Bas Schulte - 29 Oct 2006 12:25 GMT
On 29-okt-2006, at 9:02, kurtz le pirate wrote:
> #/Users/admin/Downloaded/devel/perl/perl-5.8.8/perl -v
> This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-2level
> ...
>
> shame on me !
> any chance to repair that ?
Those paths seem to go pretty much everywhere so if I were you, I'd
just rebuild perl with the proper path (-D /the/path/you/want on
the ./Configure commandline).
Bas Schulte - 29 Oct 2006 12:27 GMT
> Those paths seem to go pretty much everywhere so if I were you, I'd
> just rebuild perl with the proper path (-D /the/path/you/want on
> the ./Configure commandline).
Oops, too fast. That would be -Dprefix=/the/path/you/want
Joel Rees - 29 Oct 2006 14:37 GMT
On 2006/10/29, at 17:02, kurtz le pirate wrote:
> me too,
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> shame on me !
> any chance to repair that ?
Did you do the "make install"?
The make install step moves your executables where you specify. If
you don't specify, the default is /usr/local/bin which, in my
opinion, is as good a place as any.
> thanks
Kurtz Le Pirate - 29 Oct 2006 15:38 GMT
> Did you do the "make install"?
i don't !
> The make install step moves your executables where you specify. If
> you don't specify, the default is /usr/local/bin which, in my
> opinion, is as good a place as any.
no perl in /usr/local/bin
the v5.8.8 executable is in :
"/Users/admin/Downloaded/devel/perl/perl-5.8.8"

Signature
klp