Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Programming / Perl / June 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Universal Binary vs. Perl5

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dan Kogai - 07 Jun 2005 04:37 GMT
Porters,

So it happened.

I am surprisingly unsurprised at the news.  These days I hardly care  
CPUs.  I am as CPU-blind ad "Color-blind" (in a politically correct  
sense).  But as a Perl5 porter I found at least a couple of issues we  
have to care.

What's gonna happen to XS?
--------------------------

It already uses ".bundle" so in theory it can handle multiple  
architectures but in practice?

And Archname?
-------------

Hmm....  This one may not be an issue.   Usually it is CPU-OS-misc  
(i.e. i386-freebsd-64int) but It is simply "darwin".

Any thoughts?

Dan the (Perl5 Porter|Mac User Since 1989)
Chris Nandor - 07 Jun 2005 16:52 GMT
> What's gonna happen to XS?
> --------------------------
>
> It already uses ".bundle" so in theory it can handle multiple  
> architectures but in practice?

Dunno.  I do know that building for multiple platforms worked with the same
basic configuration under NeXT (or so I am told).  I don't recall if those
were fat binaries, but I think they may have been.

The bottom line is I won't worry about Mac-Carbon for, oh, a year or two.  I
see no reason to rush.  Heck, my stuff is included with Mac OS X in Tiger
now, so I figure there's a chance they will fix any problems in it.  ;-)

I'll let Apple shake out the bugs and perhaps give me/us some access to a
machine (I'd think we could probably get at least one machine for Perl
developers to work with ...).  Maybe Ed can give us some clues, when the
time is right.  (Maybe if it would make us feel better, we can start working
now to get a dev box, with permission to have multiple people get access to
it (me, Dan, Sherm(?), a pumpking or two ... ?)

I don't want to get into a big argument about the decision itself.  Well,
OK, maybe I do, but I won't do so here.  And I see no reason to think the
sky is falling.  When Mac OS X first came out, Fred Sanchez gave us patches
to get perl running.  We figured it all out, in time, and there's plenty of
time.

That's not to say there aren't a lot of concerns, and Lord knows I have mine
(the ones Dan raise here, especially).  But I've no reason to think that we
won't be able to take care of what needs to be taken care of.

Signature

Chris Nandor                      pudge@pobox.com    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Technology Group       pudge@ostg.com     http://ostg.com/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.