Router and "bridge" for PC, Mac on Sprint DSL?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Sara Garland - 22 May 2005 17:43 GMT A few days ago I asked on behalf of my parents for advice on a router to connect to a DSL box ("SPRINT 645M - Plus - 2 ASDL Modem-Bridge.") currently connected to a PC, so a forthcoming iMac could simultaneously be connected to the net. The advice was basically that any old router would do the trick. Thanks for the help.
My mom called Sprint to make sure that this was okay, and the rep said that we could use any router but we'd also need to call Sprint and let them know about the additional computer to they could "upgrade the bridge."
I have no idea what that means. Are they talking about upgrading the DSL box in my folks' home, or a software bridge on their end, or are they just planning to charge my parents more while essentially doing noting?
Please advise. (And please don't advise switching DSL providers- they live in a rural area and this is all they can get.)
TIA.
Phil Earnhardt - 22 May 2005 18:49 GMT [Valid group comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc substituted for comp.sys.mac.hardware.]
>A few days ago I asked on behalf of my parents for advice on a router to >connect to a DSL box ("SPRINT 645M - Plus - 2 ASDL Modem-Bridge.") [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >them know about the additional computer to they could "upgrade the >bridge." My ISP had software that would allow only one host to be connected through my DSL connection.
I altered my configuration: I installed a router with ports -- a Linksys BEFSR41 -- just downstream of my DSL modem. I have one computer connected to my ISP -- that router. All of my computers are connected to that.
This change required no modification whatsoever in the configuration of the DSL modem.
>I have no idea what that means. Many of the DSL ISPs have "enhanced" services to allow multiple computers to be visible to the DSL modem. But, if you're getting a router/hub, you need no such services.
Perhaps your folks didn't clearly explain that all of your computers would be behind a separate router. Or maybe the customer service types didn't understand.
> Are they talking about upgrading the DSL >box in my folks' home, or a software bridge on their end, or are they >just planning to charge my parents more while essentially doing noting? It's certainly possible for DSL ISPs to have "enhanced" services that are available by flipping a switch on their side. If you're cynical, you might suppose that they deliberately "misunderstand" when people talk about putting multiple computers behind a router.
My ISP offered me a router "for free" if I would sign up for the multi-host service at an added $10/month. I told him that his free service was way too expensive -- I picked up the BEFSR41 for around $20 on Ebay.
>Please advise. (And please don't advise switching DSL providers- they >live in a rural area and this is all they can get.) My recommendation is just to put in the rourter and see what happens. If one computer behind the router works, then multiple ones should definitely work when you add them.
>TIA. --phil
Charles Dyer - 22 May 2005 20:08 GMT > A few days ago I asked on behalf of my parents for advice on a router to > connect to a DSL box ("SPRINT 645M - Plus - 2 ASDL Modem-Bridge.") [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > TIA. Get a router such as a Linksys NR041. This has a single upstream port (marked 'Internet') and four other ports (1 through 4) which can be used to attach other devices. Port one is special, it can be used to daisy-chain other routers at the touch of a button. That particular router is easily available in retail stores such as Walmart as well as computer stores such as CompUSA. One feature it has is MAC address spoofing. If the ISP in question goes to the trouble of checking for the MAC address of just one particular computer, the router can be set to pass that address on instead of its own. Clear, comic-book-style, instructions on how to do this are included. Once set up, you may have as many devices connected to the DSL device via the router as you wish, just buy additional hubs/switches/routers and attach to port 1.
There are numerous other routers, from Linksys and from companies such as Netgear and Belkin, which can do the same thing. I just happen to have a NR041 handy and know it works.
 Signature We are Microsoft of Borg. You will be assimilated. Stability is irrelevant. Where _you_ want to go to today is irrelevant. We will add your currency to our own. Bend over right now. Resistance is futile.
John Albert - 22 May 2005 20:11 GMT RE the posting: << My mom called Sprint to make sure that this was okay, and the rep said that we could use any router but we'd also need to call Sprint and let them know about the additional computer to they could "upgrade the bridge." I have no idea what that means. Are they talking about upgrading the DSL box in my folks' home, or a software bridge on their end, or are they just planning to charge my parents more while essentially doing noting? >>
There is nothing the telco needs to do.
You do NOT want them to charge your parents for 2 separate DSL accounts.
Your parents should say NOTHING more to the phone company. Just get a router, install it, and set it up.
The phone company needs to know NOTHING about what is going on "beyond" their DSL modem.
The more recent crop of DSL modems have such things as authentication and a basic "router" (only one port) built right in, so that they can offer NAT (network address translation, which provides some hardware firewall protection, I believe).
You will have to locate and examine the documentation that came with the specific DSL modem she has, and see what your setup options are. All this can usually be done with a web browser.
You will have to ascertain what kind of connection scheme your parents' DSL setup is using. That is to say, whether it is a simple "DHCP" (without password, unlikely), or perhaps PPPoE (which uses a username and password for authentication, this is VERY likely). The only way to do this is to check out their setup personally, or have it checked out by someone who knows what they're doing.
I would recommend that you set the modem up to connect _without_ doing authentication (let the router do this) or NAT if it is used (again, let the router do this for you).
You can probably find out more, about the DSL modem, the DSL setup itself, etc., by going to broadbandreports.com and checking the tech sections and message boards...
- John
Charles Dyer - 22 May 2005 20:17 GMT > RE the posting: > << My mom called Sprint to make sure that this was okay, and the rep said that [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > - John NAT alone won't work if the ISP checks for the MAC address. Most don't. Back when AT&T had a cable network, and offered cable modem service, they did, until they worked out just how easy it was to bypass that. (They went to the trouble of installing a NIC in Windows machines and setting their cable modems to talk to just that particular MAC address. I'm not sure what they did with Macs.) There were other ISPs which did the same thing. This seems to be a thing of the past now, but there are still routers on the market which will spoof MAC addresses if you want.
 Signature We are Microsoft of Borg. You will be assimilated. Stability is irrelevant. Where _you_ want to go to today is irrelevant. We will add your currency to our own. Bend over right now. Resistance is futile.
Jeff Wiseman - 22 May 2005 20:58 GMT > NAT alone won't work if the ISP checks for the MAC address. Most don't. Back > when AT&T had a cable network, and offered cable modem service, they did, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > be a thing of the past now, but there are still routers on the market which > will spoof MAC addresses if you want. What if the DSL provider is using Static IP adresses? Would that address need to then be assigned to the router instead of the computer so that the NAT would work correctly?
Just wondering if something like that might explain the need for an "adjustment to the bridge". Even if they were not going to charge for the use of multiple device access, might there not be some tweaks needed to the default usage of the static address so that multiple devices could work happily on the line?
 Signature Jeff Wiseman to reply, just remove ALLTHESPAM
Phil Earnhardt - 22 May 2005 21:27 GMT >> NAT alone won't work if the ISP checks for the MAC address. Most don't. Back >> when AT&T had a cable network, and offered cable modem service, they did, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >address need to then be assigned to the router instead of the >computer so that the NAT would work correctly? If the ISP required a static IP address, you would have to assign that address to the router to get basic IP connectivity. Not a problem -- you should be able to assign an upstream IP address to any router out there.
>Just wondering if something like that might explain the need for >an "adjustment to the bridge". Even if they were not going to >charge for the use of multiple device access, might there not be >some tweaks needed to the default usage of the static address so >that multiple devices could work happily on the line? No. If you're using a router configured for DHCP and NAT, then there should be no alteration needed for the DSL Modem. That's what all those proxies in the router are for: as far as the DSL modem is concerned, there is one single computer that's downstream of it.
--phil
Charles Dyer - 22 May 2005 21:35 GMT >> NAT alone won't work if the ISP checks for the MAC address. Most don't. >> Back [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > What if the DSL provider is using Static IP adresses? That would depend on how they set the static IP up. If they did an exclusion, then it wouldn't matter how you connected. If they did a reservation, then _only_ the device reporting with the correct MAC address will be allowed to use that IP.
It's very, very easy to set up an exclusion, and slightly more difficult to set up a reservation. Basically, all they need to know is the MAC address of your machine. Noted that Ethernet or AirPort devices will have MAC addresses, a six-part hex address which reads something like 00:99:ad:a1:73:1a (not a real MAC address, so far as I know...) and it's very easy to set things up so that _only_ that particular address connects. Which means that if the MAC address in question is that of the DSL device, you can hang anything you like off the end of the Ethernet cable and they won't know... but if something happens to your DSL device, you're screwed until the ISP resets the reservation. If the MAC address in question is that of the first device past the DSL device, you'd better make sure that that first device is your router or that your router can spoof its MAC address so that it delivers a MAC address the ISP likes. And, again, if your router dies, you're screwed.
> Would that > address need to then be assigned to the router instead of the > computer so that the NAT would work correctly? If your ISP has a reservation, that would be best.
> Just wondering if something like that might explain the need for > an "adjustment to the bridge". Even if they were not going to > charge for the use of multiple device access, might there not be > some tweaks needed to the default usage of the static address so > that multiple devices could work happily on the line? Once the router is installed and set up properly, the ISP cannot see anything behind it and can't do anything about whatever you do back there. That's the beauty of NAT. You can buy one line and then hang hundreds of machines behind the router, all using the same single line.
Just make sure that your local DHCP (and, if necessary, DNS) doesn't conflict with that of the ISP. NAT allows you to generate your very own subnets; use subnets which aren't routable over the internet, or you _will_ be sorry, because the ISP _will_ detect that and they _will_ be mightily pissed, and rightly so. (Safe subnets: 192.168.x.x with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0. There are others, but if you need more than a Class C you also know how to set up a Class A or a Class B.) Most Linksys routers come set for 192.168.1.x or 192.168.0.x. Other vendors use other settings.
If you change the default settings, and step on someone else's IP addresses, the wrath of the ISP will be awesome to behold, so don't mess with the settings unless you know what you're doing.
 Signature We are Microsoft of Borg. You will be assimilated. Stability is irrelevant. Where _you_ want to go to today is irrelevant. We will add your currency to our own. Bend over right now. Resistance is futile.
|
|
|