Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Hardware / April 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Older Dual Processor machines for a tightwad?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Andy - 26 Apr 2007 12:01 GMT
Hi folks,

Was just wondering how the older (ie 1gHz) Duel Processor G4 Power Mac
machines stack up performance wise?

As a bit of background, I can't justify a huge cash outlay on new Mac
hardware.  Generally I'll look to update my older hardware fairly
regularly in the lower end of the second-hand market to keep somewhat
'up-to-date'...  I'm currently running an eMac 700/1GB/40GB/Superdrive.
 Just threw in an extra 512mb of RAM yesterday and hooked up a 21"
monitor and it's not all that bad, really.

But, I have the opportunity to buy a PowerMac G4 Dual 1ghz for a
reasonable price.

Is this likely to be much of a step up in performance?

Sorry if this is a terribly newbie question, I just don't *quite*
understand where this particular model sits compared to machines
equipped with G4 1.25/1.42ghz processors (ie first gen Mac Mini).

There's no great rush for me to upgrade, and my thoughts were with
perhaps looking for a used Mac Mini a couple of months down the track...

Any thoughts and advice appreciated.

Cheers,

Andy.
Warren Oates - 26 Apr 2007 12:24 GMT
In article
<4630866e$0$17244$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,

> But, I have the opportunity to buy a PowerMac G4 Dual 1ghz for a
> reasonable price.

How much? We're using a Sawtooth, with a 1.6 processor upgrade, and 1
gig of RAM, and bigger hard drives, and it keeps up with our needs. We
also have a Mac Pro, which I love dearly.
Signature

W. Oates

Andy - 26 Apr 2007 12:31 GMT
> In article
> <4630866e$0$17244$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> gig of RAM, and bigger hard drives, and it keeps up with our needs. We
> also have a Mac Pro, which I love dearly.

Looking at $600AUD, which is roughly what I'm looking to spend, provided
the boost in performance is worthwhile.

To demonstrate how out of the loop I am, I don't even know what a
'Sawtooth' is (I used to be able to name and identify every model from
the 512K to the PowerMac 8100, 'back in the day'...)

To compare, the best G5 price I could find ATM for a 1.8ghz/256 (very
quick search) is $1100.

Where does this machine 'fit in', if at all, compared with similarly
spec'd machines like the other higher end G4 equipped machines?  Or how
does it even compare to a G5?

Thanks again,

Andy.
Erik Richard Sørensen - 26 Apr 2007 14:06 GMT
Hei Andy

>>> But, I have the opportunity to buy a PowerMac G4 Dual 1ghz for a
>>> reasonable price.

Instead of sending two posts, I here put in a couple of general comments
to your orig. posting.

There are two scenaries here.
1. Upgrade your existing equipment.
2. Buing a newer second-hand model

To '1'. If you have fx. a 400-733mhz PowerMac G4, whic is filled with
RAM, disks, ekstra PCI etc., it might be even cheaper to upgrade your
machine with a Duyal G4/1,6-1,8ghz processor. - A processor like fx.
GigaDesigns Dual G471,8ghz or a PowerLogix PoerForce47 Dual G4/1,8ghz
will suite into any older G4AGP model from 400 to 1ghz. AND - with these
processors you still will keep the possibility of booting in OS 9.x.

But if your computer is a model with nearly only standard configuration
(256mb RAM, 30gb HD and nothing else), a CPU upgrade isn't advisable.

To '2'. If your computer is a std. model without any adds, it's better
to buy fx. the Dual 1ghz, which you mention. The price you mention is
very, very fine. - And you can probably sell your own for half the price
you must give - $2-300AUd.

The difference in performance to fx. an old G4/400mhz compared with a
Dual G4 is enormous - at least 5x the G4/400mhz, - and if your machine
even is a G3, the benefit will be even as high as 8-10x with a Dual G4/1ghz.

You mentioned a MacMini 1,42ghz up against the Dual 1ghz. Here I'd say
that you will get much more in the Dual 1ghz than in the MacMini. My
experiences are that the full-size architecture in a common tower model
is much, much better than in the MacMinis. Alone the differences in the
types of harddisks - 2,5" in the Mini towards the std. 3.5" in a tower.
The 3.5" disks is stronger and more reliable in use. OK, the 2,5" disks
might be good in connection with an external 3.5" disk, where you use
the internal 2.5" for the system, and the external for work.....

>> How much? We're using a Sawtooth, with a 1.6 processor upgrade, and 1
>> gig of RAM, and bigger hard drives, and it keeps up with our needs. We
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 'Sawtooth' is (I used to be able to name and identify every model from
> the 512K to the PowerMac 8100, 'back in the day'...)

A 'Sawtooth' is the name of the first generation G4 models with AGP
capability. G4/350mhz, G4/400mhz, G4/450mhz, Dual G4/400mhz.

I have had two G4/400mhz AGP Sawtooths, which I have upgraded to a
Single G4/1,4ghz and Dual G4/1,4ghz. These two 'oldies' from 1998 indeed
have done great jobs. And performance against my old Blue&White
G3/900mhz (PowerForce45 upg. card) was incredible - apprx. 4-5x to the
Single 1,4ghz and apprx. 8x to the Dual G4/1,4ghz in performance.

> To compare, the best G5 price I could find ATM for a 1.8ghz/256 (very
> quick search) is $1100.

And here I presume US dollars and not Australian? - Even this price is
cheap, but it hasn't got much memory. And to make this one work best,
you must have at least 1gb of memory added, maybe also a bigger disk of
160-250gb, and then it isn't cheap, but market price.

> Where does this machine 'fit in', if at all, compared with similarly
> spec'd machines like the other higher end G4 equipped machines?  Or how
> does it even compare to a G5?

In a way you can't say that a G5 'fits' into the line here. The G5
technology is so much different than the G4 that it is a 'stand-alone'
series...

But - roughly said, - if we rank the G4s / G5s in generations, you could
place them this way.

1st: - G4 350mhz and 400mhz PCIGraphics - non AGP architecture nickname
'Yikes'
2nd: - G4 350mhz, 400mhz, 450mhz, Dual 400mhz - AGP architecture -
nickname 'Sawtooth'
3rd: - G4 466mhz, 500mhz, 533mhz, Dual 450mhz - AGP architecture -
nickname 'GigabitEthernet'
4th: - G4 500mhz, 533mhz, 667mhz, 733mhz, Dual 500mhz - nickname
'DigitalAudio'
5th: - G4 733mhz, 867mhz, 933mhz, Dual 800mhz - nickname 'QuickSilver'
6th: - G4 933mhz, 1ghz, 1,25ghz, 1,42ghz, Dual 1ghz, Dual 1,25ghz, Dual
1,42ghz - nickname 'MDD'
7th: - G5 1,5ghz, 1,8ghz, 2ghz, Dual 1,5ghz, Dual 2ghz - don't recall
the nickname...

These are only the main models. There are variations inbetween each
generation of models. But there are only 4 different generations of the
CPU itself - the PCIGraphics, AGP, DigitalAudio/QuickSilver and the MDD,
where the G5 CPUs architecture is quite another technology...

The two upgrades I mentioned above from GigaDesigns and PowerLogix
infact is the 4th generation of G4 CPUs, which originally were meant for
what became the G5, because Apple chose to switch to another delieverer.
You can read more about these processors at www.gigadesigns.com and
www.otherworldcomputing.com.

Hope you can use this for comparison....
Cheers, Erik Richard

Signature

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rgds. Grüße, Mvh. Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC
 <erikrichard_NOSP@M_stofanet.dk>  <http://www.nisus.com>
 NisusWriter Express - The Future In Multilingual Textprocessing
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Erik Richard Sørensen - 26 Apr 2007 14:09 GMT
Hei Andy

>>> But, I have the opportunity to buy a PowerMac G4 Dual 1ghz for a
>>> reasonable price.

Instead of sending two posts, I here put in a couple of general comments
to your orig. posting.

There are two scenaries here.
1. Upgrade your existing equipment.
2. Buing a newer second-hand model

To '1'. If you have fx. a 400-733mhz PowerMac G4, whic is filled with
RAM, disks, ekstra PCI etc., it might be even cheaper to upgrade your
machine with a Dual G4/1,6-1,8ghz processor. - A processor like fx.
GigaDesigns Dual G4/1,8ghz or a PowerLogix PoerForce47 Dual G4/1,8ghz
will suite into any older G4AGP model from 400 to 1ghz. AND - with these
processors you still will keep the possibility of booting in OS 9.x.

But if your computer is a model with nearly only standard configuration
(256mb RAM, 30gb HD and nothing else), a CPU upgrade isn't advisable.

To '2'. If your computer is a std. model without any adds, it's better
to buy fx. the Dual 1ghz, which you mention. The price you mention is
very, very fine. - And you can probably sell your own for half the price
you must give - $2-300AUd.

The difference in performance to fx. an old G4/400mhz compared with a
Dual G4 is enormous - at least 5x the G4/400mhz, - and if your machine
even is a G3, the benefit will be even as high as 8-10x with a Dual G4/1ghz.

You mentioned a MacMini 1,42ghz up against the Dual 1ghz. Here I'd say
that you will get much more in the Dual 1ghz than in the MacMini. My
experiences are that the full-size architecture in a common tower model
is much, much better than in the MacMinis. Alone the differences in the
types of harddisks - 2,5" in the Mini towards the std. 3.5" in a tower.
The 3.5" disks is stronger and more reliable in use. OK, the 2,5" disks
might be good in connection with an external 3.5" disk, where you use
the internal 2.5" for the system, and the external for work.....

>> How much? We're using a Sawtooth, with a 1.6 processor upgrade, and 1
>> gig of RAM, and bigger hard drives, and it keeps up with our needs. We
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 'Sawtooth' is (I used to be able to name and identify every model from
> the 512K to the PowerMac 8100, 'back in the day'...)

A 'Sawtooth' is the name of the first generation G4 models with AGP
capability. G4/350mhz, G4/400mhz, G4/450mhz, Dual G4/400mhz.

I have had two G4/400mhz AGP Sawtooths, which I have upgraded to a
Single G4/1,4ghz and Dual G4/1,4ghz. These two 'oldies' from 1998 indeed
have done great jobs. And performance against my old Blue&White
G3/900mhz (PowerForce45 upg. card) was incredible - apprx. 4-5x to the
Single 1,4ghz and apprx. 8x to the Dual G4/1,4ghz in performance.

> To compare, the best G5 price I could find ATM for a 1.8ghz/256 (very
> quick search) is $1100.

And here I presume US dollars and not Australian? - Even this price is
cheap, but it hasn't got much memory. And to make this one work best,
you must have at least 1gb of memory added, maybe also a bigger disk of
160-250gb, and then it isn't cheap, but market price.

> Where does this machine 'fit in', if at all, compared with similarly
> spec'd machines like the other higher end G4 equipped machines?  Or how
> does it even compare to a G5?

In a way you can't say that a G5 'fits' into the line here. The G5
technology is so much different than the G4 that it is a 'stand-alone'
series...

But - roughly said, - if we rank the G4s / G5s in generations, you could
place them this way.

1st: - G4 350mhz and 400mhz PCIGraphics - non AGP architecture nickname
'Yikes'
2nd: - G4 350mhz, 400mhz, 450mhz, Dual 400mhz - AGP architecture -
nickname 'Sawtooth'
3rd: - G4 466mhz, 500mhz, 533mhz, Dual 450mhz - AGP architecture -
nickname 'GigabitEthernet'
4th: - G4 500mhz, 533mhz, 667mhz, 733mhz, Dual 500mhz - nickname
'DigitalAudio'
5th: - G4 733mhz, 867mhz, 933mhz, Dual 800mhz - nickname 'QuickSilver'
6th: - G4 933mhz, 1ghz, 1,25ghz, 1,42ghz, Dual 1ghz, Dual 1,25ghz, Dual
1,42ghz - nickname 'MDD'
7th: - G5 1,5ghz, 1,8ghz, 2ghz, Dual 1,5ghz, Dual 2ghz - don't recall
the nickname...

These are only the main models. There are variations inbetween each
generation of models. But there are only 4 different generations of the
CPU itself - the PCIGraphics, AGP, DigitalAudio/QuickSilver and the MDD,
where the G5 CPUs architecture is quite another technology...

The two upgrades I mentioned above from GigaDesigns and PowerLogix
infact is the 4th generation of G4 CPUs, which originally were meant for
what became the G5, because Apple chose to switch to another delieverer.
You can read more about these processors at www.gigadesigns.com and
www.otherworldcomputing.com.

Hope you can use this for comparison....
Cheers, Erik Richard

Signature

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rgds. Grüße, Mvh. Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC
 <erikrichard_NOSP@M_stofanet.dk>  <http://www.nisus.com>
 NisusWriter Express - The Future In Multilingual Textprocessing
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Andy - 28 Apr 2007 07:13 GMT
> Hei Andy
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> will suite into any older G4AGP model from 400 to 1ghz. AND - with these
> processors you still will keep the possibility of booting in OS 9.x.

Thankyou everyone for their informative replies.

I've taken a punt and bought the Dual 1ghz G4 machine.  Now, my only
remaining question is about the type of RAM it takes:

Will the extra 512MB PC-133 SDRAM I just threw into my old eMac (700)
slot straight into the new machine?  I seem to be getting different info
from the various websites out there.

Thanks again,

Andy.
Erik Richard Sørensen - 28 Apr 2007 13:29 GMT
Hei Andy

>>>>> But, I have the opportunity to buy a PowerMac G4 Dual 1ghz for a
>>>>> reasonable price.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> slot straight into the new machine?  I seem to be getting different info
> from the various websites out there.

Hm, I'm not quite sure, but if I remember right, the Dual 1ghz uses DDR
RAM and not PC-133. You can find better info using 'MacTracker' for
these informations. It's free, and you can download it here.
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/10816

Cheers, Erik Richard

Signature

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rgds. Grüße, Mvh. Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC
 <erikrichard_NOSP@M_stofanet.dk>  <http://www.nisus.com>
 NisusWriter Express - The Future In Multilingual Textprocessing
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Andy - 28 Apr 2007 13:30 GMT
> Hei Andy
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Cheers, Erik Richard

Sadly versiontracker.com seems to be dead at the moment (has been all day.)

Hopefully if it is different RAM then it's not _quite_ as obsolete
(expensive) as the stuff I bought earlier in the week for the eMac.

Thanks again,

Andy.
Erik Richard Sørensen - 28 Apr 2007 13:50 GMT
Hei again...

>>> Will the extra 512MB PC-133 SDRAM I just threw into my old eMac (700)
>>> slot straight into the new machine?  I seem to be getting different
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Sadly versiontracker.com seems to be dead at the moment (has been all day.)

Hm, it might be a local issue at your place, - here in Denmark it's
working fine.... - You can download it directly from his site here.
http://www.mactracker.ca/

> Hopefully if it is different RAM then it's not _quite_ as obsolete
> (expensive) as the stuff I bought earlier in the week for the eMac.

I know taht situation... I was searching for some 256mb PC-100 modules.
- It took more months, before I was able to find some. - And now it's
even worse to find PC 100. - And worst is that I'm also looking for some
128mb DRAM DIMM non-EDO for my old PM 9600/350....

cheers, Erik Richard.

Signature

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rgds. Grüße, Mvh. Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC
 <erikrichard_NOSP@M_stofanet.dk>  <http://www.nisus.com>
 NisusWriter Express - The Future In Multilingual Textprocessing
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Andy - 28 Apr 2007 14:14 GMT
> Hei again...

Hello :-)

>> Sadly versiontracker.com seems to be dead at the moment (has been all
>> day.)

> Hm, it might be a local issue at your place, - here in Denmark it's
> working fine.... - You can download it directly from his site here.
> http://www.mactracker.ca/

Thanks for that.  Looks to be a useful tool.  Buggered if I know what's
going on with versiontracker though - it still won't load for me.  It
starts, Safari gets about 1/10 of the way across the title bar loading,
then it just stops.  Then I get a "Server stopped responding" error.

>> Hopefully if it is different RAM then it's not _quite_ as obsolete
>> (expensive) as the stuff I bought earlier in the week for the eMac.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> even worse to find PC 100. - And worst is that I'm also looking for some
> 128mb DRAM DIMM non-EDO for my old PM 9600/350....

Ouch.  Finding the modules wasn't the problem, but paying a premium
price for older technology didn't sit that well with me...

Cheers,

Andy.
Erik Richard Sørensen - 28 Apr 2007 14:55 GMT
>>> Sadly versiontracker.com seems to be dead at the moment (has been all
>>> day.)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> starts, Safari gets about 1/10 of the way across the title bar loading,
> then it just stops.  Then I get a "Server stopped responding" error.

I have some problems with loading too - very sloooow, but it loads. This
'bug' came right after they updated their sites last time. Therefore I
wrote to the team. They answered that it might be related to the fact
that I was in Denmark, and the servers are in the US.

I also tried to use Safari, but that was a real sleepy experience, so I
went back to only use SeaMonkey (Mozilla). I has helped a bit now, but
VT is still slow...

>>> Hopefully if it is different RAM then it's not _quite_ as obsolete
>>> (expensive) as the stuff I bought earlier in the week for the eMac.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Ouch.  Finding the modules wasn't the problem, but paying a premium
> price for older technology didn't sit that well with me...

Here I can really recommend to buy at OtherworldComputing. I've bought
lots of thing there for many years now, and have never got a single
thing that wasn't top-quality to reasonable prices. Especially memory
moduels are very, very good and cheaper than most other companies.
http://otherworldcomputing.com/

the 'worst' is that I ordered a lot in December last year and simply
forgot to add some DRAM DIMMs for my 9600. Here in Denmark these modules
will cost around $125USd for a 128bm module. - At OWC they are as low as
apprx. $20USd....

Cheers, Erik Richard

Signature

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rgds. Grüße, Mvh. Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC
 <erikrichard_NOSP@M_stofanet.dk>  <http://www.nisus.com>
 NisusWriter Express - The Future In Multilingual Textprocessing
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

David - 29 Apr 2007 14:33 GMT
> >>> Hopefully if it is different RAM then it's not _quite_ as obsolete
> >>> (expensive) as the stuff I bought earlier in the week for the eMac.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Cheers, Erik Richard

I agree, OWC is my first choice vendor and I have always gotten good
value.  When shopping for RAM I always check out this link.  

http://dealnews.com/memory/

Signature

I do the best I can, but I could be wrong.
please post reply to newsgroup.
David, Williamsport, PA. USA.

David - 28 Apr 2007 13:52 GMT
In article
<4632e5f1$0$17222$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,

> Thankyou everyone for their informative replies.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Andy.

I took a quick look online and found two Apple PowerMac models with 1GHz
G4 DP.  The Quicksilver (QS) and the Mirrored Double Door (MDD).  The QS
does take the PC133 but the MDD takes PC2700.  If your are not sure
which you have check out  http://www.everymac.com/

As always, I do the best I can, but I may be incorrect.

David

Signature

please post reply to newsgroup.
David, Williamsport, PA.

Andy - 28 Apr 2007 14:12 GMT
> In article
> <4632e5f1$0$17222$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> David

Thanks David.  Looks like I lucked out - the machine is a 'Quicksilver'
model without the fancy mirrored doors.

Cheers,

Andy.
Gregory Weston - 26 Apr 2007 14:47 GMT
In article
<4630866e$0$17244$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,

> Hi folks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> But, I have the opportunity to buy a PowerMac G4 Dual 1ghz for a
> reasonable price.

How reasonable? Typical price for such a machine would be in the
vicinity of that for a low-end new mini.

> Is this likely to be much of a step up in performance?

Yes, as long as it has (or will be configured to have) at least as much
memory. Performance slams into a wall as soon as you start swapping, so
if the new tower falls back to VM earlier than the eMac did you may not
see the gains you should.

> Sorry if this is a terribly newbie question, I just don't *quite*
> understand where this particular model sits compared to machines
> equipped with G4 1.25/1.42ghz processors (ie first gen Mac Mini).

Quite a bit faster, actually.

G
Andy - 26 Apr 2007 14:59 GMT
> In article
> <4630866e$0$17244$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> How reasonable? Typical price for such a machine would be in the
> vicinity of that for a low-end new mini.

Looking at $600AUD.  Cheapest I've seen a new 'low-spec' mini is about
$800AUD, via an eBay seller in Hong Kong (hmmm...) - but generally $900
and up from trusted retailers.

>> Is this likely to be much of a step up in performance?
>
> Yes, as long as it has (or will be configured to have) at least as much
> memory. Performance slams into a wall as soon as you start swapping, so
> if the new tower falls back to VM earlier than the eMac did you may not
> see the gains you should.

Yep.  From my searching, both machines appear to use the same RAM, which
would be quite handy considering I just upgraded this thing to 1GB
earlier this week.  I'm imagining installing my DVD burner would be
rather a lot easier in the tower than it was into the eMac, too...(also
done earlier this week)

>> Sorry if this is a terribly newbie question, I just don't *quite*
>> understand where this particular model sits compared to machines
>> equipped with G4 1.25/1.42ghz processors (ie first gen Mac Mini).
>
> Quite a bit faster, actually.

Sounds like it might be a good deal then, but will have to see how my
bank balance is looking...The Tower will certainly be a bit less
annoying than the eMac - it's currently sitting at my feet with no way
of turning it's internal display off (running a 21" display on the
desk).  Basically I'd like to be able to give the eMac to my mum to
replace her old G3/233 machine.

Thanks again,

Andy.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.