I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next year.
But right now I want to get external storage. I've happily bought from
OWC (macsales.com) before and they have these 500Gb external drives:
$270: Firewire400 & USB 2.0
$300: Firewire800, Firewire 400 & USB 2.0
$330: eSATA, Firewire800, Firewire 400 & USB 2.0
Cases and drives are otherwise identical.
For current needs, I can't use anything more than Firewire400 with my
current Mac. But the MacbookPro can use Firewire800 and even access
eSATA with an adapter.
Should I spend the extra money for the quad-port external drive? Would
an eSATA connector be noticably faster than FW800 for dealing with
Photoshop files and music-editing?
John Slade - 10 Oct 2006 20:24 GMT
>I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next year.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> an eSATA connector be noticably faster than FW800 for dealing with
> Photoshop files and music-editing?
Don't listen to Wegie, he's clueless about most issues.
If you get eSATA it will be a lot faster than USB or Firewire 800. If
the adapter used either USB or Firewire, it will be a waste of time and
money. However if you can plug the adapter right into the computer via PCI
slot or a PCMCIA/CardBus/ExpressCard slot, you will get the full speed.
John
Jim Polaski - 11 Oct 2006 02:36 GMT
> I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next year.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> an eSATA connector be noticably faster than FW800 for dealing with
> Photoshop files and music-editing?
You would get the best results with an external eSATA drive, but you'd
also have to be running some version of OS X, perhaps 10.2 or above
since you'd also need a PCI card for optimum performance and to have the
connection.
For Example,
http://www.granitedigital.com/catalog/pg49_fasthostadapters.htm
That said, if you plan on moving up to a newer Mac, Firewire would be
fine for the moment, but I wouldn't plan on it for a long-term solution
Steven de Mena - 11 Oct 2006 05:12 GMT
>> I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next
>> year.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> the
> connection.
The Mac Pros have two extra internal SATA connectors, and all you need
is a bracket (internal-to-external) to mount in one of the PCI-e slots
to utilize eSATA.
Steve
Jim Polaski - 11 Oct 2006 06:20 GMT
> >> I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next
> >> year.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Steve
She wasn't talking about a Mac Pro as she has an old PowerMac. The
MacBook Pro, is not a tower either so, the Firewire would be the best
idea.
John Slade - 12 Oct 2006 06:45 GMT
>>> I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next year.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> a bracket (internal-to-external) to mount in one of the PCI-e slots to
> utilize eSATA.
That's great for the workstation but what about the average user. You
know the people who own iMacs and Mini Macs. What would they have to do to
get external eSATA?
John
Steven de Mena - 12 Oct 2006 06:52 GMT
>>>> I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next
>>>> year.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> John
They couldn't but would be well served with Firewire.
Steve
Michelle Ronn - 11 Oct 2006 06:33 GMT
> I have an old Powermac, but I think I'm getting a MacbookPro next year.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> an eSATA connector be noticably faster than FW800 for dealing with
> Photoshop files and music-editing?
I will try to put this pretty simply. You are hooking up to the
MacBookPro. You will not be able to max out these buses in a real work
situation, so any of them will do.
The drives that I use from LaCie have USB and firewire ports. Firewire
is good and reliable. If you are sticking with the Mac, firewire is
fine. Look for a drive that has USB capability, as Apple seems to be
the only big and constant supporter of firewire. USB will help "future
proof" you a bit.
If you are looking for long term compatibility, and want to try some
fancier RAID stuff down the road, eSATA is probably the way to go.
However, sticking with the Mac, which has no native eSata solution, you
are looking at going USB to eSATA to drive, or some other solution. It
could introduce a bottleneck or two.
btw: if you go with a USB external drive, chances are, it is still a
SATA drive inside anyway.
Peter Bjørn Perlsø - 26 Nov 2006 19:28 GMT
> Should I spend the extra money for the quad-port external drive? Would
> an eSATA connector be noticably faster than FW800 for dealing with
> Photoshop files and music-editing?
No.

Signature
regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog
http://markedspartiet.dk, http://macplanet.dk
http://siad.dk