Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Country Specific / Australian Mac Group / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

MacPro and LaCie Big Disk

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rifty - 19 Nov 2007 19:10 GMT
I haven't done the homework on this yet but I am hoping someone with
experience might point me in the right direction and save me time.

I have a MacPro on OSX.4.11 with a 2 x 3 gHz Quad Core processor and 4
gigs of RAM. I also have an ethernet LaCie 1000 gig external drive. At
present the only way to connect to this drive is to plug it into the
router I use for internet stuff via the ethernet cable and network it.

The LaCie is supposed to be capable of gigabit transmission speeds, but
the data transfer rate via the router is simply painful. I seem to
recall when I had a PC networked to the Mac system I had, I could get
data through the same network I'm using now from that old PC laptop a
hundred times faster than the MacPro can talk to this drive via the
router.

Any ideas on how I can get the data transfer speed to an acceptable
level? I have HDV movie files of up to 80 gigs each, and I don't want to
spend 10 hours transferring each of them to a drive that is supposed to
be really fast!

Is there a way to connect the MacPro via one of its ethernet ports
directly to the ethernet port of the drive, without a router to
negotiate between them? I can't make them talk to each other doing that.

Rifty

Signature

riftynet - put a dot after rifty

Nigel - 20 Nov 2007 01:37 GMT
> I haven't done the homework on this yet but I am hoping someone with
> experience might point me in the right direction and save me time.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Rifty
Hi Rifty

Firstly, the router will not likely be 1000base Tx but either 10 or 100 so
that is the first bottleneck I would imagine.  You can check by going to the
network system, pref panel, click on the advanced tab of the ethernet and
look at the ethernet tab (far right).  It will tell you what it is.  And
yes, plug them in via ethernet - the mac is auto negotiating and there is no
need fro cross over cables and the like. The drive is DHCP compatible.
Of course by far the fastest would be firewire 800 but I presume you didn't
get that particular disk.

Nigel
Rifty - 20 Nov 2007 02:50 GMT
> > I haven't done the homework on this yet but I am hoping someone with
> > experience might point me in the right direction and save me time.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> > Rifty
>  Hi Rifty

Nigel - very much appreciate your response, and also personal assistance
via email from Ken who gave me this very useful link:

http://netgear.com.au/Products/Switches/DesktopSwitches/GS105.aspx
 
> Firstly, the router will not likely be 1000base Tx but either 10 or 100 so
> that is the first bottleneck I would imagine.  You can check by going to the
> network system, pref panel, click on the advanced tab of the ethernet and
> look at the ethernet tab (far right).  It will tell you what it is.  

Now just bear with me as I must be having a senior moment, but I am
intepreting your instructions re going to the network system etc as
going to System Prefs, clicking on Network and choosing Built-In
Ethernet, and then selecting Ethernet on the far right. But I don't see
any Advanced tab on the way to that point - just a Configure option. Am
I not looking in the right place?

> And
> yes, plug them in via ethernet - the mac is auto negotiating and there is no
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Nigel

When you say, plug them in via ethernet, do you mean directly one of the
ethernet ports of the MacPro to the LaCie drive? I couldn't see any
response from the MacPro anywhere to indicate it had been plugged into
an external drive while attempting that.

Sorry to sound dumb, but these things always look ridiculously easy once
you've done them right the first time and understand what you've done!

Rifty
Signature

riftynet - put a dot after rifty

Nigel - 26 Nov 2007 05:09 GMT
>>> I haven't done the homework on this yet but I am hoping someone with
>>> experience might point me in the right direction and save me time.
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> Rifty
Sorry Rifty - been away so a slow reply. Its my senior moment (and im not
senior yet!) - I was looking at my Leopard OS with those instructions.
However, an easier way to check your network connection speed is using the
network utility in the utilities folder - the first tab pane is info and it
should tell you what the current speed is (you might have to toggle the
connection it reports on by switching from ew0 to ew1 - youll see what I
mean).

As to the plugging directly into each other that is what I suggested.  It
was more of a way to see if giabit ethernet was working so what does the
speed link say now (100 or 1000?).  I suppose you could use it that way but
that would take a bit of working out - I would have thought the drive would
now appear on your network as a server but these things are not certain-
look in the finder.

Nigel
Rifty - 28 Nov 2007 03:13 GMT
> Sorry Rifty - been away so a slow reply. Its my senior moment (and im not
> senior yet!) - I was looking at my Leopard OS with those instructions.

Whew! Given that I am in the zone, I'm glad it was as simple as that. :)

> However, an easier way to check your network connection speed is using the
> network utility in the utilities folder - the first tab pane is info and it
> should tell you what the current speed is (you might have to toggle the
> connection it reports on by switching from ew0 to ew1 - youll see what I
> mean).

Yeah - great!  Thanks so much for that. The connection at en1 (which is
the LaCie) is 100Mb.  I have actually networked a separate dlink router
with the dlink switch and I am getting faster speeds than I was, but
still nothing like what I expected or hoped. When I had the old PC
laptop connected via the router to my MacMini, I am sure I was getting
400Mb through that link. So it is still  slower than my slowest USB2
drive, which is very frustrating, because this LaCie when checked
through the web admin page claims to be available at 1000Mb.

> As to the plugging directly into each other that is what I suggested.  It
> was more of a way to see if giabit ethernet was working so what does the
> speed link say now (100 or 1000?).  

100. But 25 gig files take an hour to upload. Too slow as far as I am
concerned. Yes, I did connect through this separate router to the
MacPro's Ethernet 2 port, and has no other hardware connected. Nothing
else to slow it down as far as I can see.

> I suppose you could use it that way but
> that would take a bit of working out - I would have thought the drive would
> now appear on your network as a server but these things are not certain-
> look in the finder.

No problem getting the drive to appear on the network once connected
through the router. If I just plug the drive direct to the ethernet port
on the MacPro, is can be seen as an alias but says it has a different
version of the AFP and can't be connected directly (is there a clue in
that somewhere for direct connection?)  I can only bring it up as a
server via the network with the intercession of a router, which
obviously has the right transfer protocol.

I just can't believe that an ethernetted machine can't be made to
transfer data at a speed lower than the slowest USB2 machine. I would
love to know how to alter the settings to somehow release that
bottleneck.

Thanks for the info so far. Very helpful.

Rifty

Signature

riftynet - put a dot after rifty

Rifty - 28 Nov 2007 22:00 GMT
> I just can't believe that an ethernetted machine can't be made to
> transfer data at a speed lower than the slowest USB2 machine.

For 'lower' there, read 'higher'!

Rifty

Signature

riftynet - put a dot after rifty

Andrew Beavis - 02 Dec 2007 08:43 GMT
USB2 is faster than gig ethernet

Sorry

You can experiment with dual channel gig ethernet if you want, but only
between 2 computers

On 29/11/07 9:00 AM, in article 1i8bz6h.12uxoy31plxqauN%rifty@tpg.com.au,

>> I just can't believe that an ethernetted machine can't be made to
>> transfer data at a speed lower than the slowest USB2 machine.
>
> For 'lower' there, read 'higher'!
>
> Rifty
Rifty - 02 Dec 2007 12:39 GMT
> USB2 is faster than gig ethernet
>
> Sorry

Thanks. Andrew. After trying just about everything, I discovered that,
so you are confirming it.  That's a pity because I paid a good deal more
for it than for a USB device of the same capacity.

> You can experiment with dual channel gig ethernet if you want, but only
> between 2 computers

Not sure how that works and haven't done any reading on it, but I am
guessing that the dual ethernet ports on the MacPro have something to do
with it.

In my situation I have only one computer with two ethernet ports (if
that's what you mean!)

Rifty

Signature

riftynet - put a dot after rifty

Andrew - 02 Dec 2007 22:55 GMT
If you have a home network you could use it as a backup drive for several
computers

And get a firwire drive for fast copies

On 2/12/07 11:39 PM, in article 1i8in55.sszjra1n097u2N%rifty@tpg.com.au,

>> USB2 is faster than gig ethernet
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Rifty
Rifty - 03 Dec 2007 06:33 GMT
> If you have a home network you could use it as a backup drive for several
> computers

I do an I can do that. My intention was to have a fast backup for very
large iMovie files (up to 100 gigs or so) but I don't think I can afford
24 hours each time I want to back them up!  But at least I did put on
the original footage and can always get it back through the LaCie
server.

> And get a firwire drive for fast copies

I have a couple of firewire drives and about 5 USB2 ones up to 500mb.
They are all networkable I find. My mistake was to assume that ethernet
was going to be very very fast and I could use it like I do my main hard
drive. I now know I should have got another large internal drive
instead. I was thinking of portability.  I keep hoping someone will come
up with a breakthrough and allow me to use it at something like its
potential gigabit speed! The LaCie tells me it's capable of that speed,
and the link speed at en0 on my MacMini and on en1 on my MacPro Fatboy,
why can't they talk to each other at that speed and bypass the router
altogether??? Isn't there some protocol that would connect them at a
much faster speed than the router and network switch allow?

Live and learn I guess....

Rifty
Signature

riftynet - put a dot after rifty

Nigel - 04 Dec 2007 00:35 GMT
>> If you have a home network you could use it as a backup drive for several
>> computers
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Rifty

Rifty

It occurred to me that what you need with speed and portability is this
beast here

http://www.firmtek.com/seritek/seritek-2en2/

A portable SATA enclosure for the mac.  It goes at 3.6Gbps so its even
faster than FW800. Even better its hot swapable. This beast is for a desktop
(I cant remember what computer you wanted to use) but they have laptop
versions (via expresscards) as well

Nigel
Andrew - 20 Nov 2007 03:59 GMT
Your backup drive is designed for network backups of data, and quantity, but
not for speed. Sadly, gig ethernet is not 10x faster than 100tx, but it is
faster (2-3x) To get this, plug your gig devices into a gig switch and
connect the switch to the router. Your external packets are 100tx but local
traffic will be at gig speeds, which is what you want.
One limitation I have found is that these drives are usually FAT32 formatted
and have some restrictions about name length, path length and character
choice in filenames, which is annoying for mac people.
For better speed you need a fw400, fw800 or USB2 backup drive. All are
pretty good, with fw800 the best

> I haven't done the homework on this yet but I am hoping someone with
> experience might point me in the right direction and save me time.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Rifty
John Bennett - 20 Nov 2007 21:31 GMT
> One limitation I have found is that these drives are usually FAT32 formatted
> and have some restrictions about name length, path length and character
> choice in filenames, which is annoying for mac people.

That's interesting - I had thought of getting one. Is it possible to
partition the drive, and/or reformat with mac format?

I need Mac and PC backup

John
Andrew - 20 Nov 2007 22:51 GMT
No, not on the ones I have tried. They are only FAT32 because of the
interface card firmware, and heaps of files would not copy from a mac volume
because of the reasons I outlined. I have tried about 3 fdifferent ones and
they had similar problems

There is a rack mountable lacie model with windows embedded. It might be
better than the others but its expensive. I have not tested it. It different
to the one referred to in this posting ie the bigger disk model.

You are better off with an old mac as a network backup. Preferably running
osx server but osx will do if its just macs

On 21/11/07 8:31 AM, in article
4743521c$0$10313$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au, "John Bennett"
<john439@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>> One limitation I have found is that these drives are usually FAT32 formatted
>> and have some restrictions about name length, path length and character
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> John
Rifty - 21 Nov 2007 13:04 GMT
> > One limitation I have found is that these drives are usually FAT32 formatted
> > and have some restrictions about name length, path length and character
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> John

For the record, the USB drives I have attached directly to the MacPro
spat the dummy on some IMovieHD files, because they have odd characters
and hidden files with odd characters, but the networked LaCie FAT32
formatted accepted them via the network with no problem. I just tested
by sending it a folder of about 50 characters in the filename and it was
perfectly happy to accept it too. I was not expecting it to do this

As soon as I get the desktop switch box to speed up the transmission
process, I feel that it will all work out just fine.

Rifty

Signature

riftynet - put a dot after rifty

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.