Yesterday I upgraded to iLife 05, mainly because I wanted to stay
current on iPhoto. To my chagrin, while the program functions, and has
some useful new features -- especially a much improved tool for removing
red eye, about which more later -- it's so slow it's almost unusable. My
machine is a 500MHz iMac DV, with 512M of RAM, running 10.3.7. Most
programs take a long time to launch but work fine once they're running.
When I say "so slow it's almost unusable," I mean I can count seconds
off between the time I click, hold, and drag the mouse and the time the
selection box appears. Same with any other operation. Virtually every
action results in a spinning beach ball.
Another thing: the red eye removal is slick as a brick: you enlarge the
photo, select the tool, click in the center of the pupil, and poof.
Unfortunately, though, it doesn't get saved when I close the edit window
for the photo. Other changes, like contrast or brightness or cropping,
remain; but the changes wrought by red eye removal disappear.
I never had problems like this with ANY of the previous versions of
iPhoto.

Signature
Tad Davis
taddavis@ucwphilly.rr.com
Paul Mitchum - 29 Jan 2005 06:21 GMT
> Yesterday I upgraded to iLife 05, mainly because I wanted to stay
> current on iPhoto. To my chagrin, while the program functions, and has
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I never had problems like this with ANY of the previous versions of
> iPhoto.
Nowadays 512M is a pretty slim amount of memory. I know this because my
iBook has 384M of memory. :-)
Get Matt Neuberg's MemoryStick and watch to see how much memory swapping
and paging is going on when you launch iPhoto. Get it here:
<http://www.tidbits.com/matt/> Installing more RAM might solve the
problem.
Or if you want other software: I downloaded the test-drive of iView
Media Pro, and I'm definately going to buy it. Very fast, lovely
interface, doesn't make duplicates of all my image files like iPhoto
(though you can tell it to do that). More bells and whistles than you're
likely to need, so it's nice that there's a $49 'lite' version.
<http://www.iview-multimedia.com/>

Signature
"I hear the rumors on the internets." -- George W. Bush
Per Dalum Jensen - 31 Jan 2005 14:52 GMT
[snip]
> When I say "so slow it's almost unusable," I mean I can count seconds
> off between the time I click, hold, and drag the mouse and the time the
> selection box appears. Same with any other operation. Virtually every
> action results in a spinning beach ball.
[snip]
> I never had problems like this with ANY of the previous versions of
> iPhoto.
I'm very interested in hearing about other users experience with iLife
'05 on a kind of low-end mac. I plan to purchase the new iLife for use
on a iBook 500 MHz, but I'm a bit worried about the performance on my iBook.
Is Tad unlucky (sorry, Tad!) or are his observations true to a more
general degree?
Thanks!
- Per
aRKay - 01 Feb 2005 01:30 GMT
> I'm very interested in hearing about other users experience with iLife
> '05 on a kind of low-end mac. I plan to purchase the new iLife for use
> on a iBook 500 MHz, but I'm a bit worried about the performance on my iBook.
>
> Is Tad unlucky (sorry, Tad!) or are his observations true to a more
> general degree?
Ditto..... others please post observations on slower Macs. Something
tell me you need a high end G4 or G5 to run iPhoto 5.
sbt - 01 Feb 2005 02:03 GMT
In article
<REMOVEarkay-6F3C92.19301631012005@newssvr12-ext.news.prodigy.com>,
> > I'm very interested in hearing about other users experience with iLife
> > '05 on a kind of low-end mac. I plan to purchase the new iLife for use
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Ditto..... others please post observations on slower Macs. Something
> tell me you need a high end G4 or G5 to run iPhoto 5.
Well, it runs quite nicely on an 800MHz G4 iMac (768MB RAM), which is
hardly a "high-end G4" -- even feels a bit faster than iPhoto4.

Signature
Spenser
Tad Davis - 01 Feb 2005 14:09 GMT
I tried the MemoryStick recommendation. When I launched iPhoto5 on my
500MHz iMac (512MB ram) and edited a photo, the portion of memory marked
"Free" shrank to about 13M. It never disappeared, and there remained a
substantial block of memory (>200M) marked "Inactive". What DID happen,
though, is that the number of swap files jumped from 1 to 2. (Now I'll
go back and study the docs!)
It appears the iView Media alternative lacks the editing tools of
iPhoto5. Did I miss something there? (I need, at a minimum, cropping --
to compensate for my lousy composition skills -- and red-eye correction
-- to keep my many blond-haired, blue-eyed nieces and nephews from
looking like demons.)

Signature
Tad Davis
taddavis@ucwphilly.rr.com