> > > I tried putting nothing inside two ' signs but it didn't work.
> > > I wonder: is your reason for asking the same as mine?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> How about.... "Subject does not contain [insert most frequently used
> letter]"
> LOL sorry, that was completely stupid.
Actually, not stupid at all... Test for vowels.
;-)
If all of the following conditions are met:
Subject does not contain a
Subject does not contain e
Subject does not contain i
Subject does not contain o
Subject does not contain u
Perform the following actions:
Move message to Trash
Mark as read
Stop evaluating rules
Charles - 09 Jan 2005 22:06 GMT
> Actually, not stupid at all... Test for vowels.
>
> ;-)
>
> If all of the following conditions are met:
> Subject does not contain a
I am going to try that. Except all the following conditions are met:
From does not contain a
The e-mails that are blank have no text in the From header. They also
have no text in the subject header, but sometimes real correspondents,
forget to put in a subject header. The ones with no from are not real.

Signature
Charles
Devi Jankowicz - 09 Jan 2005 22:48 GMT
> > LOL sorry, that was completely stupid.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Mark as read
> Stop evaluating rules
'Thy' ?
Well, since I know no old-time Quakers, I'm prepared to take a chance on
this particular false negative... Thank you!
Kind regards,
Devi
Dave Balderstone - 09 Jan 2005 23:20 GMT
> 'Thy' ?
>
> Well, since I know no old-time Quakers, I'm prepared to take a chance on
> this particular false negative... Thank you!
The idea was to test for a blank subject so based on Madwen's post I
wondered what the shortest list of letters one would have to test for.
I can think of a couple of possible subject lines that one would have
to add "y" to the list for. Good catch.
My, my, my...
Adrian - 15 Jan 2005 15:08 GMT
> > > LOL sorry, that was completely stupid.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Well, since I know no old-time Quakers, I'm prepared to take a chance on
> this particular false negative... Thank you!
How about "My Hymns" or "Fly 2PM 3/3/05" or similar ... great idea for
the From field though.

Signature
Adrian
Tim Irvin - 15 Jan 2005 15:14 GMT
> > > > LOL sorry, that was completely stupid.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> How about "My Hymns" or "Fly 2PM 3/3/05" or similar ... great idea for
> the From field though.
Or those people who don't put anything at all the subject line, even if
it's not spam?

Signature
Tim Irvin, ziggy29@mac.com
"Trouble no one about their religion; respect others in their view, and
demand that they respect yours...Abuse no one and nothing, for abuse
turns the wise ones to fools and robs the spirit of its vision."
-- Tecumseh (1768-1813), Shawnee chief and statesman
Madwen - 09 Jan 2005 23:18 GMT
> > LOL sorry, that was completely stupid.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Mark as read
> Stop evaluating rules
Yep, testing for all the vowels (don't forget Y) should catch 99% of
those subjectless emails. :)
Charles - 11 Jan 2005 10:12 GMT
> > LOL sorry, that was completely stupid.
>
> Actually, not stupid at all... Test for vowels.
>
> ;-)
The test for vowels in the "From" line works. Thank you Madwen and Dave.

Signature
Charles