Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Mac Applications / September 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2-page viewing of PDFs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 02:55 GMT
I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
first page always wants to be by itself.

this means I have to scan in the 1st page of the music twice and then
the rest of the pages.  Kind of a PITA.

Since most of my music is 2 pages, it isn't a horrible solution, but is
there something better than Preview at this??

thanks
Lloyd
Jolly Roger - 23 Sep 2008 03:13 GMT
> I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> for my organ

Ewwwww... GROSS!

Signature

Send responses to the relevant news group rather than to me, as
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR

dorayme - 23 Sep 2008 03:39 GMT
> I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> thanks
> Lloyd

There's Adobe Acrobat Reader or app, and there is a plugin for browsers
that allows this. I can see two pages side by side in my Safari and FF
with Schubert.

<http://www.schubert-it.com/>

Signature

dorayme

Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 05:33 GMT
> > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> > for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> <http://www.schubert-it.com/>

thanks.
dorayme - 23 Sep 2008 07:08 GMT
> > > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> > > for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> thanks.

But look again at what Wayne has said. In the Preview app, look at the
View menu. There is a PDF Display submenu, click on PDF Display to see.

Signature

dorayme

Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 13:33 GMT
> > > > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> > > > for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> But look again at what Wayne has said. In the Preview app, look at the
> View menu. There is a PDF Display submenu, click on PDF Display to see.

I have and did again.  Under that menu the choices are :

One page
One page continuous
Two pages
Two pages continuous
Crop Box
Media Box

If I select either of the 2 page settings, I get 2 pages side-by-side
AFTER the 1st page.  The first page always wants to stand alone.
Calum - 23 Sep 2008 14:00 GMT
> There's Adobe Acrobat Reader or app, and there is a plugin for browsers
> that allows this. I can see two pages side by side in my Safari and FF
> with Schubert.
>
> <http://www.schubert-it.com/>

Note that Schubert is only available for PPC Macs, or was the last time
I looked.

Skim is a nice free alternative to Preview, which also does what the OP
wants: <http://skim-app.sourceforge.net/>
Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 17:33 GMT
> > There's Adobe Acrobat Reader or app, and there is a plugin for browsers
> > that allows this. I can see two pages side by side in my Safari and FF
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Skim is a nice free alternative to Preview, which also does what the OP
> wants: <http://skim-app.sourceforge.net/>

I didn't know that about Schubert.

I got Skim last night, but it wouldn't run for some strange reason.  
After reading this, I tried to run it again and it worked just fine.  
And you are right, it does EXACTLY what I want!

Count me as happy as a clam!! <G>

Thanks

Lloyd
Wayne C. Morris - 23 Sep 2008 05:27 GMT
> I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
> first page always wants to be by itself.

Under the View -> PDF Display sub-menu, check "Facing Pages" and uncheck
"Book Mode".
Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 05:32 GMT
In article
<wayne.morris-B98A6B.23270122092008@shawnews.wp.shawcable.net>,

> > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> > for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
> > first page always wants to be by itself.
>
> Under the View -> PDF Display sub-menu, check "Facing Pages" and uncheck
> "Book Mode".

??  

I don't see any selection under View PDF Display sub-menu like those.  
Are we talking Preview or something else??
Wayne C. Morris - 23 Sep 2008 22:41 GMT
> > > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of
> > > music for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I don't see any selection under View PDF Display sub-menu like those.  
> Are we talking Preview or something else??

Preview 3.0.9 on Mac OS 10.4.11.  Don't tell me they removed those
options on Leopard?  Maybe they moved those options somewhere else.  Try
checking Preview Preferences, or search Preview Help for "PDF" and look
for an item about viewing pages side-by-side.
Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 22:46 GMT
In article
<wayne.morris-2E51DB.16414423092008@shawnews.wp.shawcable.net>,

> > > > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of
> > > > music for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> checking Preview Preferences, or search Preview Help for "PDF" and look
> for an item about viewing pages side-by-side.

It isn't there with OSX 10.5.x.
sbt - 24 Sep 2008 02:27 GMT
In article
<wayne.morris-2E51DB.16414423092008@shawnews.wp.shawcable.net>, Wayne
C. Morris <wayne.morris@this.is.invalid> wrote:

> > > > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of
> > > > music for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> checking Preview Preferences, or search Preview Help for "PDF" and look
> for an item about viewing pages side-by-side.

Yeah, they appear to be gone and after a brief survey of defaults, it
appears that the setting used for facing pages is no longer recognized
for that purpose, but turns on "Two Pages".

Signature

Spenser

BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 24 Sep 2008 02:59 GMT
> C. Morris <wayne.morris@this.is.invalid> wrote:

> > > > Under the View -> PDF Display sub-menu, check "Facing Pages" and
> > > > uncheck "Book Mode".

> > Preview 3.0.9 on Mac OS 10.4.11.  Don't tell me they removed those
> > options on Leopard?  Maybe they moved those options somewhere else.  Try
>
> Yeah, they appear to be gone and after a brief survey of defaults, it

Wayne, I wonder if you (or someone else running Preview 3.09)
could dump the text contents of their
  Preferences/com.apple.Preview.plist
for us.   There was no setting indicating "Book Mode" anywhere
in my prefs file for Preview 4 under 10.5, but it's possible that
the setting may be able to be recognised by the program even
if it's not listed in the plist by default or accessible
under the GUI.  It's certainly worth a few moments to experiment.
If I knew the name of the setting (it'd be inside the Preview
dictionary inside the file, inside a pair of <key>Something</key>
brackets - that's where the settings are all stored.

Of course, this is just wishful thinking.  But if it is
there, we could easily come up with a command line for
someone to run to add the setting flag to his plist file
and thus flip to book mode even though there is no GUI
menu access to it.  If it's there.  This is just a guess!

Signature

Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks.  The rest gets trashed.
No HTML in E-Mail! --    http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
  http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 24 Sep 2008 02:50 GMT
> > > Under the View -> PDF Display sub-menu, check "Facing Pages" and
> > > uncheck "Book Mode".

> Preview 3.0.9 on Mac OS 10.4.11.  Don't tell me they removed those

They're certainly not there in Preview v 4.1 under 10.5.5

I could find no way to modify the default behavior ("book mode"
is an apt name for it - it's like a printed book, where pages
two and three may both be viewed at one time).

Signature

Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks.  The rest gets trashed.
No HTML in E-Mail! --    http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
  http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 23 Sep 2008 13:44 GMT
> I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
> first page always wants to be by itself.

Doesn't that make sense, though?  When you open a book
to page two, you see two pages - page two and page three.
If they shifted them all by one, two-page spreads would
not come out right.

Page one is always on your right.  What would you put to
the left of it?

Admittedly, it ought to be an option to ignore this normal
state for books for which two-page layouts don't matter.
But it *is* a normal layout.

Signature

Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks.  The rest gets trashed.
No HTML in E-Mail! --    http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
  http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

Jeffrey Goldberg - 23 Sep 2008 14:49 GMT
> Doesn't that make sense, though?

Not for music.

> When you open a book to page two, you see two pages - page two and page
> three. If they shifted them all by one, two-page spreads would not come
> out right.

If you have music with an even number of pages, it is much better for the
first page to be a verso page instead of a recto page.

Cheers,

-j

Signature

Jeffrey Goldberg                     http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
 I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings.
 http://improve-usenet.org/

gtr - 23 Sep 2008 15:29 GMT
>> When you open a book to page two, you see two pages - page two and page
>> three. If they shifted them all by one, two-page spreads would not come
>> out right.
>
> If you have music with an even number of pages, it is much better for
> the first page to be a verso page instead of a recto page.

Better said; If you have 2-pages music, you want to see it all rather
than having to turn pages during performance.
Signature

Thank you and have a nice day.

Jeffrey Goldberg - 23 Sep 2008 19:47 GMT
>> If you have music with an even number of pages, it is much better for the
>> first page to be a verso page instead of a recto page.
>
> Better said; If you have 2-pages music, you want to see it all rather than
> having to turn pages during performance.

My statement is more general.  Consider four pages of music.  If it
started like a book on the recto page, you would need to turn a page twice
during a performance: between 1 and 2 and between 3 and 4.  But if the
first page is on the left (verso), then only one turn of a page is needed.
(That assumes no repeats.)

And it is not just turns of the page, but being able see a larger amount
of the music at one time.  Having two two-page spreads is far better than
having only one two-page spreads and two one-page spreads.

So for any even number of pages, starting on the left will save one turn
of a page and always maximize the amount of visible music at any one time.

Of course when repeats are taken into account there may be exceptions.  If
repeats in a four page piece send you back and forth between pages 2 and 3
then starting on right would be better.  I believe that quality music
engravers attempt to avoid dividing pages that way when they can.

Cheers,

-j

Signature

Jeffrey Goldberg                     http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
 I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings.
 http://improve-usenet.org/

BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 23 Sep 2008 16:08 GMT
> > Doesn't that make sense, though?
>
> Not for music.

I wasn't aware that there were exceptions.  Does the music not
have a title page which may be used as page 1, so that the two
page music spans pages two and three?

> > When you open a book to page two, you see two pages - page two and
> > page three. If they shifted them all by one, two-page spreads would
> > not come out right.
>
> If you have music with an even number of pages, it is much better for
> the first page to be a verso page instead of a recto page.

I'm sure that's the case.  Clearly, though, before you open it up
to that two page spread, you are looking at something.  What is that -
page zero?

As I said, there's no reason for Preview or Acrobat to NOT offer
the option to pretend that there's a page zero (ie. to show pages
one and two as facing pages), but it certainly makes sense for
the default behavior to be as it is.

Perhaps a more recent version of Adobe Reader (the last one I
looked at was 7.0 and I think it's up to 9 now) offers this as
an option.

Signature

Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks.  The rest gets trashed.
No HTML in E-Mail! --    http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
  http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 17:32 GMT
> > > Doesn't that make sense, though?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> have a title page which may be used as page 1, so that the two
> page music spans pages two and three?

Individual sheet music does have a title page, books of collections
don't except for the overall book title.

But you don't play titles do you?  I play the music.  :)

> > > When you open a book to page two, you see two pages - page two and
> > > page three. If they shifted them all by one, two-page spreads would
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> looked at was 7.0 and I think it's up to 9 now) offers this as
> an option.

Neither Preview nor AR do what I want as far as I can figure out.
Jeffrey Goldberg - 23 Sep 2008 19:33 GMT
In <lloydparsons-950E56.11321123092008@news.individual.net>, Lloyd Parsons...:

> Neither Preview nor AR do what I want as far as I can figure out.

In the worst case, you could add a title page (Preview allows you to add
pages from one PDF to another) which you just ignore after that.

-j

Signature

Jeffrey Goldberg                     http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
 I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings.
 http://improve-usenet.org/

Telstar - 29 Sep 2008 06:20 GMT
>> > > Doesn't that make sense, though?
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Individual sheet music does have a title page, books of collections
> don't except for the overall book title.

Wrong.  As a professional musician, almost without exception the score opens
to TWO pages.  Musicians can read ahead.
Mike Thornburg - 29 Sep 2008 10:38 GMT
>Neither Preview nor AR do what I want as far as I can figure out.

I haven't yet installed the latest version of Adobe Reader, but in the
Version 8 which I have, I think you would want to go to the
View->Page Display menu, select Two-Up, and then either check or
uncheck "Show Cover Page During Two-Up" (which is found in the same
Page Display menu) to see if one of the two settings of this toggle
will give you what you want.

Mike
Jeffrey Goldberg - 23 Sep 2008 19:56 GMT
> Does the music not have a title page which may be used as page 1, so
> that the two page music spans pages two and three?

Published sheet music does do exactly that, but the difference between
music and text persists.  In text (for left to right languages like
English) the contents of the first (and typically every) chapter will
start on the right.  So you read one single page, then turn the page, and
only then are you presented with a two-page spread of content.  With sheet
music, all of the copyright or publisher information is on the very front
or very back, so the second page of the physical document is where the
content begins.

These conventions for music aren't arbitrary.  The do make the music
easier to read and perform.

Cheers,

-j

Signature

Jeffrey Goldberg                     http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
 I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings.
 http://improve-usenet.org/

Telstar - 29 Sep 2008 06:21 GMT
>> Does the music not have a title page which may be used as page 1, so that
>> the two page music spans pages two and three?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> or very back, so the second page of the physical document is where the
> content begins.

Yes.  The front page is NOT page 1.
Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 17:30 GMT
> > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> > for my organ.  While I can do it with Preview, for some reason, the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> state for books for which two-page layouts don't matter.
> But it *is* a normal layout.

Hmm....

I hadn't thought of it that way.  Makes sense.  But I still would like
it to do it differently.

thanks
Marc Heusser - 23 Sep 2008 15:26 GMT
> I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> for my organ.

Have a look at Papers, http://mekentosj.com/papers/
It has been done for a different setting, but its full screen reading
mode might just be perfect for you - and you can put your entire library
in place, like iTunes.

HTH

Marc

Signature

remove bye and from mercial to get valid e-mail
<http://www.heusser.com>

Lloyd Parsons - 23 Sep 2008 17:59 GMT
In article <marc.heusser-DA43E8.16263823092008@news.uzh.ch>,
Marc Heusser <marc.heusser@byeheusser.commercialspammers.invalid>
wrote:

> > I want to use my computer to allow 2-page, side-by-side, pages of music
> > for my organ.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Marc

Thanks for the link and recommendation.  I downloaded a trial version.

It is a bit of overkill for what I want, but then again, it does more
than I had originally intended.  It would be nice to have a collection
of music PDFs all cataloged nicely.

Neat program, next I'll have to figure out if it is worth $42 to me...

Again, thanks a bunch.

Lloyd
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.