Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Mac Applications / July 2008


Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

parallel's performance on disks?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ivowel - 01 Jul 2008 21:51 GMT
has someone done a performance comparison of the various types of
disks that parallels understand?  I am particularly interested in
native ntfs (or fat32) partitions vs. virtual ntfs (or fat32)
partitions.  sincerely,  /iaw
Reply to this Message
Shawn Hirn - 02 Jul 2008 11:12 GMT
In article
<45d7b84a-ccf7-4ac4-9234-0e766f4967f4@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,

> has someone done a performance comparison of the various types of
> disks that parallels understand?  I am particularly interested in
> native ntfs (or fat32) partitions vs. virtual ntfs (or fat32)
> partitions.  sincerely,  /iaw

What would be the point? Faster disks (RPM) will yield faster
performance in any situation, not just Parallels.
Reply to this Message
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage
Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.