Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Mac Applications / June 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is Jobs essential to continuing success of Apple?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ockham's Razor - 22 Jun 2008 04:57 GMT
Any ideas?

Signature

With or without religion, you would have good people doing
good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good
people to do evil things, that takes religion.  

                                        Steven Weinberg

Gerry - 22 Jun 2008 05:09 GMT
In article
<Mencken-9589D0.20571021062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,

> Any ideas?

There was an article in one of the national news services just this week
and their answer is no. They mentioned the design teams that create all
those wonderful toys we all want and need are the real core to Apple
(pun intended), and that one of the senior administration staff is well
suited to be the heir apparent.
Ockham's Razor - 22 Jun 2008 16:14 GMT
In article
<everyday-4FE0B6.21092821062008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,

> In article
> <Mencken-9589D0.20571021062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (pun intended), and that one of the senior administration staff is well
> suited to be the heir apparent.

Yep, saw that.

I posted here to see what the resident Mac/Apple cognoscenti thought
about it.

Signature

With or without religion, you would have good people doing
good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good
people to do evil things, that takes religion.  

                                        Steven Weinberg

sbt - 22 Jun 2008 17:25 GMT
In article
<Mencken-E4E6FC.08140322062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, Ockham's
Razor <Mencken@pdx.net> wrote:

> In article
> <everyday-4FE0B6.21092821062008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> I posted here to see what the resident Mac/Apple cognoscenti thought
> about it.

Contrary to popular "fuzzy" word usage, there is a difference between
"essential" and "highly beneficial". I don't know that Job's continued
presence is essential, but I do believe that his presence is extremely
useful in focusing and directing the efforts of the design teams cited
above. Jobs is a leader, charismatic to many and feared by some, who
gets results a high percentage of the time.

There are probably a number of individuals who can perform Jobs' job
(pun intended), but the question is whether any of them can do so with
equivalent panache -- only time and experience will determine if
someone else will fill his shoes.

Signature

Spenser

Jolly Roger - 22 Jun 2008 17:12 GMT
In article
<Mencken-9589D0.20571021062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,

> Any ideas?

None here.  Sorry.

Signature

Please send all responses to the relevant news group rather than directly
to me, as E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry
SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups.
You'll need to use a real news reader if you want me to see your posts.

JR

The World Wide Wade - 22 Jun 2008 19:40 GMT
In article
<Mencken-9589D0.20571021062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,

> Any ideas?

Is there any doubt that he was essential in one of the most stunning
turnarounds in world corporate history in a notoriously difficult tech
sector? Or that over the last decade he has been, while filling
Apple's coffers to almost unimaginable heights, one of the most
imaginative, compelling, charismatic CEOs ever seen?

Absoutely essential in the near past, yes. And it would be  a great
loss for Apple to lose his iconic presence now.

But is he essential now? Probably not. Everyone gets it now.
Howard Brazee - 23 Jun 2008 16:45 GMT
>Any ideas?

Jobs are essential for people to have enough money to buy Apple
products.

Hopefully Jobs did a better job handing off the running of his company
this time than he did the last time.
Mike Rosenberg - 23 Jun 2008 21:02 GMT
> Hopefully Jobs did a better job handing off the running of his company
> this time than he did the last time.

_DID_ a better job? Past tense? Did I miss a major news announcement
today? BTW, he was ousted the last time.

Signature

I kill Google Groups posts. See http://improve-usenet.org for details.
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/greet.cgi> Holiday cards with attitude

Howard Brazee - 23 Jun 2008 21:28 GMT
>> Hopefully Jobs did a better job handing off the running of his company
>> this time than he did the last time.
>
>_DID_ a better job? Past tense? Did I miss a major news announcement
>today? BTW, he was ousted the last time.

If he's waiting until he's gone to create the corporate culture and
leaders he wants for Apple after he leaves, then he's failing.

I've read though that he has chosen his successor though.   I don't
know about the rest.
Mike Rosenberg - 23 Jun 2008 21:35 GMT
> >> Hopefully Jobs did a better job handing off the running of his company
> >> this time than he did the last time.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> If he's waiting until he's gone to create the corporate culture and
> leaders he wants for Apple after he leaves, then he's failing.

Your wording was kind of confusing; it sounded like you were talking
about an actual event that had already occurred, not planning for a
future event.

> I've read though that he has chosen his successor though.   I don't
> know about the rest.

<http://www.thestreet.com/s/most-read-replacing-apples-irreplaceable-ste
ve-jobs/newsanalysis/technology-update/10422198.html>

Signature

I kill Google Groups posts. See http://improve-usenet.org for details.
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/greet.cgi> Holiday cards with attitude

The World Wide Wade - 23 Jun 2008 23:10 GMT
> > >> Hopefully Jobs did a better job handing off the running of his company
> > >> this time than he did the last time.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Your wording was kind of confusing;

It still is. What does "If he's waiting until he's gone" supposed to
mean?

>  it sounded like you were talking
> about an actual event that had already occurred, not planning for a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> <http://www.thestreet.com/s/most-read-replacing-apples-irreplaceable-ste
> ve-jobs/newsanalysis/technology-update/10422198.html>
Howard Brazee - 24 Jun 2008 14:53 GMT
>It still is. What does "If he's waiting until he's gone" supposed to
>mean?

I really don't know how to make that any more clear, sorry.
Howard Brazee - 24 Jun 2008 14:19 GMT
Just a note:

http://www.forbes.com/2008/06/23/gates-commentary-lyons-tech-gates08-cz_dl_0623l
yons.html?boxes=custom


The above is a link to a Forbes article asking the same question about
Bill Gates.
Burt Johnson - 24 Jun 2008 07:00 GMT
> >Any ideas?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Hopefully Jobs did a better job handing off the running of his company
> this time than he did the last time.

Uh... Are you confusing Jobs and Gates?  The latter has announced his
departure, while the former has not...

Signature

- Burt Johnson
 MindStorm, Inc.
 http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

Geoffrey S. Mendelson - 24 Jun 2008 07:34 GMT
> Uh... Are you confusing Jobs and Gates?  The latter has announced his
> departure, while the former has not...

Gates left Microsoft a long time ago. He has now as you said, made it
offical.

The comment about Steve Jobs was sparked by another "Jobs is dying" rumor
which surfaced on this group. That led someone to ask how necessary is
Jobs for Apple's continued success.

As far as I or anyone on this group knows, Jobs is not ill, has not announced
any plans to retire, the board of Apple is not planning on firing him, etc.

It was just a philosophical question with no basis in fact.

With that in mind, I doubt that Apple would do well without Jobs. MacOS would
become like Windows Vista, constant improvments with no real improvement and
their computers would head in the same direction as Dell, less and less
differentiation to make them more and more competative in price.

In plain English, IMHO MacOS would just get more bloated and worse and the
computers would become cheaper in quality and features and end up being the
same crap everyone else sells.

The iPod would become just another MP3 player, the iPhone would fade into
oblivion and iTunes would be taken over by Amazon.

But that is all speculation, not a prediction or anything based upon
fact.

Geoff.

Signature

Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm@mendelson.com  N3OWJ/4X1GM

Howard Brazee - 24 Jun 2008 14:52 GMT
>> Hopefully Jobs did a better job handing off the running of his company
>> this time than he did the last time.
>
>Uh... Are you confusing Jobs and Gates?  The latter has announced his
>departure, while the former has not...

No.   Replace "did" with "is doing".
Wes Groleau - 25 Jun 2008 04:50 GMT
> Uh... Are you confusing Jobs and Gates?  The latter has announced his
> departure, while the former has not...

In the article I read, "departure" was defined as
moving into a smaller office in the same building,
being there only one day a week, and staying involved
by e-mail.

Signature

Wes Groleau

Always listen to experts.  They'll tell you
what can't be done and why.  Then do it.
                    -- Robert A. Heinlein

Burt Johnson - 25 Jun 2008 07:16 GMT
> > Uh... Are you confusing Jobs and Gates?  The latter has announced his
> > departure, while the former has not...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> being there only one day a week, and staying involved
> by e-mail.

And none of that for the next 6 months, while Gates goes overseas to get
heavily involved in his foundation.

As others in the article stated, it is likely that Gates will find his
foundation more of a challenge than he expects, and that it may take him
away from much involvement in Microsloth as time progresses.

It noted that he is going to be involved in the Window 7 -- as if his
involvement in Vista indicated that was a good thing...?

Signature

- Burt Johnson
 MindStorm, Inc.
 http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.