In article
<arkayREMOVE-7DC8E5.11592311062008@news.houston.sbcglobal.net>,
> Is "MobileMe" the worst logo in the history of Mac?
>
> <http://www.manhattanoffender.com/2008/06/is-mobileme-the.html>
>
> I have to agree...."MobileMe" is the worst
Totally agree -- really dumb. The "Me Generation"? -- object of
ridicule.
Could live with "MobileMac" -- or "dotMac", which is catchy, up to date,
and terse.
gtr - 11 Jun 2008 21:39 GMT
> In article
> <arkayREMOVE-7DC8E5.11592311062008@news.houston.sbcglobal.net>,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Could live with "MobileMac" -- or "dotMac", which is catchy, up to date,
> and terse.
Those are words not logos. In any case both the name and logo sucks
and are the most non-Apple items yet encountered, say I.

Signature
Thank you and have a nice day.
> Is "MobileMe" the worst logo in the history of Mac?
>
> <http://www.manhattanoffender.com/2008/06/is-mobileme-the.html>
>
> I have to agree...."MobileMe" is the worst
Pretty crap design and it sounds too close to Windows Me - uggg! Still,
I'll be very happy when my .Mac account is upgraded :-)

Signature
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
> Is "MobileMe" the worst logo in the history of Mac?
>
> <http://www.manhattanoffender.com/2008/06/is-mobileme-the.html>
>
> I have to agree...."MobileMe" is the worst
Bad, bad, bad! This is the worst I've ever seen.