> Interestingly the repair permissions option is grayed out. Not
> supported with 4.1

Signature
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts
<http://designsbymike.net/election.shtml> Election 2008 goods.
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/greet.cgi> Holiday cards with attitude
> > Interestingly the repair permissions option is grayed out. Not
> > supported with 4.1
>
> I never really saw much point in having this in DW anyway.
I don't get why so many run repair permissions as often as they do. I
never run it and my systems run just fine. If I ever fins that
permissions on Apple-supplied directories or files are set incorrectly,
I'll consider running it - but that hasn't happened yet.

Signature
Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. E-mail
sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter.
JR
Lewis - 18 Mar 2008 20:58 GMT
>> > Interestingly the repair permissions option is grayed out. Not
>> > supported with 4.1
>>
>> I never really saw much point in having this in DW anyway.
>
> I don't get why so many run repair permissions as often as they do.
It's less messy than wavy chicken bones over the keyboard and sprinkling
the case with goat's blood, and is NEARLY as effective.
> I never run it and my systems run just fine.
I've run it a couple of times, mostly out of curiosity. But it's
practically useless, and in some cases in earlier OS versions it
insisted on changing permissions I didn't want changed.

Signature
"Don't be nice. It's Creepy." Tendo Akane
Jolly Roger - 18 Mar 2008 22:12 GMT
> In message
> <jollyroger-5CD744.11014218032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> It's less messy than wavy chicken bones over the keyboard and sprinkling
> the case with goat's blood, and is NEARLY as effective.
I suppose you're right about that.

Signature
Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. E-mail
sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter.
JR
Mike Rosenberg - 18 Mar 2008 22:25 GMT
> > I never really saw much point in having this in DW anyway.
>
> I don't get why so many run repair permissions as often as they do. I
> never run it and my systems run just fine. If I ever fins that
> permissions on Apple-supplied directories or files are set incorrectly,
> I'll consider running it - but that hasn't happened yet.
Which only nails home my point about DW. _If_ someone wants to do it,
it's readily available without DW anyway.

Signature
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts
<http://designsbymike.net/election.shtml> Election 2008 goods.
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers
<http://designsbymike.net/shop/greet.cgi> Holiday cards with attitude
Fred Moore - 19 Mar 2008 17:29 GMT
In article
<jollyroger-5CD744.11014218032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
> I don't get why so many run repair permissions as often as they do. I
> never run it and my systems run just fine. If I ever fins that
> permissions on Apple-supplied directories or files are set incorrectly,
> I'll consider running it - but that hasn't happened yet.
Arrgh! You pirates have all the damn luck!!
But all seriousness aside: I have encountered _numerous_ problems from
bad permissions. Most typical: I install an app or an update, be it from
Apple or another software author, then something doesn't work, up to and
including the entire computer, _until_ I repair permissions. I will say
that I have noticed this problem less with the recent OS versions, but
that may be because I _always_ repair perms before _and_ after any
update. (Some claim sacrificing a goat first helps the computer find the
correct perms list.)
What boggles my mind is that very often Apple's own system updates leave
the system with incorrectly set permissions, iTunes and ColorSync being
notable offenders. How can apple let an updater out of the house with
that sort of bug. Where is their QC?!?
--Fred