about harddisk
|
|
Thread rating:  |
mohamism - 11 Mar 2008 08:04 GMT tell me about hard disk of computers
Michael Vilain - 11 Mar 2008 10:58 GMT In article <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> tell me about hard disk of computers They spin really fast.
 Signature DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee...
Tom Stiller - 11 Mar 2008 12:37 GMT > In article > <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > > > tell me about hard disk of computers > > They spin really fast. And they're really hard.
 Signature Tom Stiller
PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
Kurt Ullman - 11 Mar 2008 13:42 GMT > > In article > > <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > And they're really hard. And they're discs. (probably about the only technical question I can answer with any confidence-g)
Howard Brazee - 11 Mar 2008 18:00 GMT >> > > tell me about hard disk of computers >> > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > And they're discs. (probably about the only technical question I >can answer with any confidence-g) RAM disks are hard but aren't disks.
Nor discs.
Kurt Ullman - 11 Mar 2008 19:24 GMT > >> > > tell me about hard disk of computers > >> > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Nor discs. Well so much for only question I can answer. sigh
dorayme - 11 Mar 2008 18:07 GMT In article <tomstiller-2DEE00.07375511032008@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> > In article > > <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > And they're really hard. And they sleep a lot.
 Signature dorayme
Jim Redelfs - 12 Mar 2008 01:21 GMT > And they sleep a lot. Mine's a Pinkerton. It never sleeps.
 Signature :) JR
dorayme - 12 Mar 2008 01:50 GMT In article <jim.redelfs-E8D739.19214411032008@news.lga.highwinds-media.com>,
> > And they sleep a lot. > > Mine's a Pinkerton. It never sleeps. I have a friend who has had some HDs spinning for more than 3 years.
And, btw, I have personally conducted measurement tests on image files that have been spun at high speed for different amounts of time and have found that they do very very slightly change their sizes. I have forwarded my results to the folk at CERN for comment. I cannot publish them here in case it is useful to the Russians.
 Signature dorayme
Jeffrey Goldberg - 12 Mar 2008 02:32 GMT In <doraymeRidThis-134B86.11503012032008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, dorayme...:
> I have a friend who has had some HDs spinning for more than 3 > years. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > time and have found that they do very very slightly change their > sizes. Ah, centrifugal image file compression. Is that lossy or lossless?
-j
 Signature Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings. http://improve-usenet.org/
dorayme - 12 Mar 2008 02:57 GMT In article <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803112029180.12273@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>,
> > I have a friend who has had some HDs spinning for more than 3 > > years. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > -j Depends on the speed. When I spin the special disks I use for the tests at positive revolutions per sec, the files grow in size and are lossy. When I spin at negative revolutions per sec, the files get smaller but are lossless. The sense of lossless here, of course, is that one can then subject the shrunken files to a positive speed and the files bounce back to their former size without loss of quality.
But it is quite complicated. At negative speeds, the files increase their quality and this is the reason why they appear not reduced in quality from how they were at normal baseline quality when speeded and grown. They lose the quality they gained.
All this is is further complicated by the direction of spin. But I better not go on with this because I think Clever Monkey right be watching me (he watches signs of prolixity on my part closely... and I am grateful to him. I always increase my medication when he points prolixity out)
 Signature dorayme
Király - 12 Mar 2008 15:44 GMT > But it is quite complicated. At negative speeds, the files > increase their quality and this is the reason why they appear not > reduced in quality from how they were at normal baseline quality > when speeded and grown. They lose the quality they gained. > > All this is is further complicated by the direction of spin. Are you in the northern or southern hemisphere? Have you done your tests in the other?
 Signature K.
Lang may your lum reek.
dorayme - 12 Mar 2008 22:43 GMT > > But it is quite complicated. At negative speeds, the files > > increase their quality and this is the reason why they appear not [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Are you in the northern or southern hemisphere? Have you done your > tests in the other? O yes, I simulate the northern hemisphere in a specially adapted bath. And yes, I know that plughole drainage directions do not depend on hemisphere. It just so happens that the bath is a special one in a way too complex to describe here (and dangerous to do so in case the Russians get my design).
And yes, it does so happen that at least in my bath, when it is switched to "Northern Mode" the water does go down and out in a direction different to when it is switched to Southern Mode. This is not quite a coincidence but it has nothing much to do with serious results I have obtained on effects on files.
 Signature dorayme
Tom Stiller - 12 Mar 2008 15:53 GMT In article <doraymeRidThis-BB2CFE.12573112032008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> In article > <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803112029180.12273@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>, [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > closely... and I am grateful to him. I always increase my > medication when he points prolixity out) In this case, you should have quit while you were ahead. Spin is a vector quantity and a negative spin *is* a reversal of direction.
 Signature Tom Stiller
PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
Howard Brazee - 12 Mar 2008 18:26 GMT >> All this is is further complicated by the direction of spin. But >> I better not go on with this because I think Clever Monkey right [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >In this case, you should have quit while you were ahead. Spin is a >vector quantity and a negative spin *is* a reversal of direction. With this strange but charming discussion, I will note that bosons have twice the spin as fermions.
dorayme - 12 Mar 2008 22:57 GMT In article <tomstiller-0202EB.10530212032008@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> In article > <doraymeRidThis-BB2CFE.12573112032008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, ...
> > All this is is further complicated by the direction of spin. But > > I better not go on with this because I think Clever Monkey right [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > In this case, you should have quit while you were ahead. Spin is a > vector quantity and a negative spin *is* a reversal of direction. I am well aware of this. You do not realise the difficulty I was in in describing my experiments. The contrast mentioned above was not between directions of spin. It was between spin and negative spin. Negative spin, you obviously missed this point, is a state on the other side of sleep.
Let me make it plain:
(1) Active with movement, spinning at n revs per sec where n > 0
(2) Inactive with n = 0
and
(3) Active with negative movement where n < 0
It should be obvious to you because of the difficulty of the Russians getting hold of my data, that I cannot go into the third state in detail but I have proof of it. There is nothing vector about the speeds. They go as fast on either side of rest. But the sides of rest are not the normal directions of spin you (and the Russians) are accustomed to.
I hope this clears up the misunderstanding.
What's my score now, Tom?
 Signature dorayme
Tom Stiller - 13 Mar 2008 01:16 GMT In article <doraymeRidThis-C81A73.08575513032008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> In article > <tomstiller-0202EB.10530212032008@newsgroups.comcast.net>, [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > I hope this clears up the misunderstanding. That depends on what your definition of "negative" is. ;-)
> What's my score now, Tom? Off-hand, I'd say ornage.
 Signature Tom Stiller
PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
Jolly Roger - 12 Mar 2008 03:51 GMT In article <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803112029180.12273@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>,
> > I have a friend who has had some HDs spinning for more than 3 > > years. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Ah, centrifugal image file compression. Don't you mean "expansion"?
 Signature Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter.
JR
Tom Stiller - 12 Mar 2008 04:05 GMT In article <jollyroger-79C07F.21511711032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
> In article > <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803112029180.12273@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>, [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Don't you mean "expansion"? Naw, the newer drives have a ridge around the periphery and when the speed exceeds a critical value, the bits pile up against it and are compressed to a fraction of their original size.
 Signature Tom Stiller
PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
Jolly Roger - 12 Mar 2008 04:10 GMT > In article > <jollyroger-79C07F.21511711032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > speed exceeds a critical value, the bits pile up against it and are > compressed to a fraction of their original size. Ohhhhhhhhh so is *that* how they do perpendicular recording?!?:
<http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/research/recording_head/pr/PerpendicularAn imation.html>
 Signature Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter.
JR
Tom Harrington - 12 Mar 2008 05:45 GMT In article <doraymeRidThis-134B86.11503012032008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> And, btw, I have personally conducted measurement tests on image > files that have been spun at high speed for different amounts of > time and have found that they do very very slightly change their > sizes. I have forwarded my results to the folk at CERN for > comment. I cannot publish them here in case it is useful to the > Russians. It's because eventually the bits fly off. They can't hold on forever. Sooner or later they lose their grip.
 Signature Tom "Tom" Harrington Independent Mac OS X developer since 2002 http://www.atomicbird.com/
Mike Rosenberg - 12 Mar 2008 13:17 GMT > It's because eventually the bits fly off. They can't hold on forever. > Sooner or later they lose their grip. That's only true of the budget-priced bits, not the expensive ones, so if this is important to you, don't buy any two-bit bits.
 Signature <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/election.shtml> Election 2008 goods. <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/greet.cgi> Holiday cards with attitude
Jeffrey Goldberg - 12 Mar 2008 17:37 GMT >> It's because eventually the bits fly off. They can't hold on forever. >> Sooner or later they lose their grip. > > That's only true of the budget-priced bits, not the expensive ones, so > if this is important to you, don't buy any two-bit bits. That's why it's important to use bits made with gluons. It's what disks crave.
-j
 Signature Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings. http://improve-usenet.org/
Tom Harrington - 12 Mar 2008 18:34 GMT In article <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803121132040.1044@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>,
> >> It's because eventually the bits fly off. They can't hold on forever. > >> Sooner or later they lose their grip. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That's why it's important to use bits made with gluons. It's what disks > crave. If you really know what you're doing, you can pop open the hard drive, scrape the bits off the inside of the case, and put them back on the disk. It's a delicate operation though, and it's easy to get bits in the wrong order if you're not careful.
 Signature Tom "Tom" Harrington Independent Mac OS X developer since 2002 http://www.atomicbird.com/
Lewis - 12 Mar 2008 18:55 GMT > In article > <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803121132040.1044@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > disk. It's a delicate operation though, and it's easy to get bits in > the wrong order if you're not careful. The trouble with that method, of course, is managing the high bits. They just want to hang out behind the spindle and eat twinkies.
 Signature Bart: This is the worst day of my life. Homer: This is the worst day of your life SO FAR.
dorayme - 12 Mar 2008 23:08 GMT > > If you really know what you're doing, you can pop open the hard drive, > > scrape the bits off the inside of the case, and put them back on the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > The trouble with that method, of course, is managing the high bits. > They just want to hang out behind the spindle and eat twinkies. I have found that you can hide the twinkies by physically forcing them into a block that you know is unreadable and that has been mapped to be avoided by the OS. The high bits know they are on the disk, they can smell them, they go seeking but they cannot find. They are easily manipulated then.
 Signature dorayme
Howard Brazee - 12 Mar 2008 16:24 GMT >> Mine's a Pinkerton. It never sleeps. > >I have a friend who has had some HDs spinning for more than 3 >years. I just started using Time Machine and noticed that every hour during the night it creates new file structures on my back-up drive. I suppose that means I should make my computer sleep when I go to bed.
I see the drive starting up when the finder checks it as well as on the hour.
Clive Sinclair - 11 Mar 2008 18:44 GMT > >> In article [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Dvd's are hard and spin quite fast ;-)
The discs on my car are hard and spin fast when driving - damn - different spelling
 Signature Clive
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take..... but by the moments that take our breath away.
Bob Harris - 13 Mar 2008 01:19 GMT > > > >> In article [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > The discs on my car are hard and spin fast when driving - damn - > different spelling Fear not. UNIVAC used to spell them Disc, it is just that they didn't hold all that much storage, were 36 bit 1's complement words, and are no longer manufactured :-)
John Varela - 13 Mar 2008 23:06 GMT >>>> In article >>>> <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > didn't hold all that much storage, were 36 bit 1's complement > words, and are no longer manufactured :-) This whole thread really should have been crossposted to alt.folkore.computers but then it would have run on for 4 or 5 hundred posts
Hell, I just might go back to the OP and crosspost a response anyway.
 Signature John Varela Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.
Lewis - 11 Mar 2008 19:20 GMT > > In article > > <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > And they're really hard. And a hard disk contains one or more discs.
 Signature Bart: This is the worst day of my life. Homer: This is the worst day of your life SO FAR.
Barry Margolin - 11 Mar 2008 19:42 GMT > > In article > > <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > And they're really hard. And they're flat and round, somewhat disc-like.
 Signature Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
Richard Maine - 12 Mar 2008 02:33 GMT > > > In article > > > <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > And they're flat and round, somewhat disc-like. They are also often found in computers.
 Signature Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience; email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement. domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
Jeffrey Goldberg - 11 Mar 2008 20:06 GMT In <vilain-840B89.02583711032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com>, Michael Vilain...:
> In article > <f8ad6688-a3a7-48bb-bec6-c8f977c215b4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > >> tell me about hard disk of computers > > They spin really fast. On a clear disk you can seek forever.
-j
 Signature Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings. http://improve-usenet.org/
Lewis - 11 Mar 2008 20:40 GMT In article <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803111405260.3552@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>,
> In <vilain-840B89.02583711032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com>, Michael Vilain...: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > On a clear disk you can seek forever. I wish I'd said that.
But not to worry, I will!
 Signature Bart: This is the worst day of my life. Homer: This is the worst day of your life SO FAR.
Jeffrey Goldberg - 12 Mar 2008 00:54 GMT >> On a clear disk you can seek forever. > > I wish I'd said that. > > But not to worry, I will! I can't take credit for it. I think I saw that in fortune or in some .sig a decades ago.
-j
 Signature Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings. http://improve-usenet.org/
Jerry Kindall - 12 Mar 2008 04:04 GMT In article <alpine.OSX.1.00.0803111852430.3552@hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org>, Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> wrote:
> >> On a clear disk you can seek forever. > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > fortune > or in some .sig a decades ago. I believe it was also in the Apple DOS 3.3 manual.
 Signature Jerry Kindall, Seattle, WA <http://www.jerrykindall.com/>
Send only plain text messages under 32K to the Reply-To address. This mailbox is filtered aggressively to thwart spam and viruses.
tacit - 15 Mar 2008 19:22 GMT > > I can't take credit for it. I think I saw that in > > fortune > > or in some .sig a decades ago. > > I believe it was also in the Apple DOS 3.3 manual. It goes back even farther than that. I've seen it in the Fortune file on a PDP/11.
 Signature Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Howard Brazee - 12 Mar 2008 16:26 GMT >>> On a clear disk you can seek forever. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > fortune >or in some .sig a decades ago. In fact I stole it back when I had a file of .sigs on my Atari 800.
|
|
|