In article
<doraymeRidThis-75B63B.08523307122007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> In article
> <nospammers-A966A8.04140506122007@johnf2.biosci.ohio-state.edu>,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> to stay on Tiger on a PPC for some time, upgrade? Are there any
> downsides anyone knows please?
Yes.
It's exceedingly rare for me to do anything with binaries these days.
But there were some minor issues in 3.5.1, some corrected in 3.5.2, and
no doubt more corrected in these two beta releases. So why *not*
upgrade, at least after it's out of beta?

Signature
Steve W. Jackson
Montgomery, Alabama
dorayme - 07 Dec 2007 21:33 GMT
In article
<stevewjackson-D8EA44.09454507122007@news.individual.net>,
> In article dorayme wrote:
> > In a word, should someone, who just does text ng like this one,
> > and who has happily enough used 3.5.1 on Tiger and is intending
> > to stay on Tiger on a PPC for some time, upgrade? Are there any
> > downsides anyone knows please?
>
> Yes.
Yes to should I upgrade and no to are there any downsides?
> It's exceedingly rare for me to do anything with binaries these days.
> But there were some minor issues in 3.5.1, some corrected in 3.5.2, and
> no doubt more corrected in these two beta releases. So why *not*
> upgrade, at least after it's out of beta?
So bottom line is this, you are on Tiger? You have upgraded to ?
and experienced no problems yourself? Is this so? If so, I will
follow you...
Fact is that MT 3.5.1 with minor irritations works fine. There is
the spell check correction glitches, these fixed?

Signature
dorayme