Word/Spread Sheet programmes
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Stan Robinson - 28 Nov 2007 03:49 GMT Hi,
I have just purchased a new iMac and was surprised to discover the old favourite "Apple Works" had disappeared?
Would appreciate advice re a substitute for AW.
Thanks,
Stan.
Bill - 28 Nov 2007 04:21 GMT > Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Stan. iWork is sort of a replacement for AppleWorks, though not exactly. I think it is better in some ways, not as good in others. Includes a good word processor/page layout program "Pages," an excellent presentation program "Keynote," and a spreadsheet "Numbers." No database module. I think a trial version probably comes installed on your iMac.
Also, TextEdit is a fairly capable simple word processor, a good deal better than the old SimpleText.
You can install AppleWorks on your new Intel iMac. AppleWorks 6 installs and runs fine. I don't know if earlier versions do. However, Apple is no longer supporting development of AppleWorks, so maybe it will not work with some future version of the Mac OS.
Of course if you want to lay out the bucks you can buy MS Office for the Mac.
Martin Trautmann - 28 Nov 2007 10:28 GMT > iWork is sort of a replacement for AppleWorks, though not exactly. I > think it is better in some ways, not as good in others. Includes a good > word processor/page layout program "Pages," an excellent presentation > program "Keynote," and a spreadsheet "Numbers." No database module. No draw module. No image module.
Bill - 28 Nov 2007 14:43 GMT > > iWork is sort of a replacement for AppleWorks, though not exactly. I > > think it is better in some ways, not as good in others. Includes a good > > word processor/page layout program "Pages," an excellent presentation > > program "Keynote," and a spreadsheet "Numbers." No database module. > > No draw module. No image module. True, but you can do drawing in both Pages and Keynote. You can also insert images into both.
Martin Trautmann - 28 Nov 2007 15:26 GMT > In article <slrnfkqgme.smd.t-use@ID-685.user.individual.de>, > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > True, but you can do drawing in both Pages and Keynote. I did not try it yet - is it as simple and as powerful as MacDraw was, 20 years ago?
- Martin
Lou Pecora - 28 Nov 2007 18:27 GMT > > In article <slrnfkqgme.smd.t-use@ID-685.user.individual.de>, > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > I did not try it yet - is it as simple and as powerful as MacDraw was, > 20 years ago? No. That type of program has disappeared from the Mac mainstream. There are two programs (maybe more) that live in the niches (why? I don't know). One is EasyDraw (not exactly sure about the name), the other is Intaglio. They look OK. I didn't like EasyDraw. Have not really tried Intaglio, although it gets good reviews. Mostly people are faced with using things like spreadsheets or page layout programs to do graphics/drawing (like using a brick for a hammer if you need to go beyond basic shapes like you could with MacDraw) or buying high end things like Illustrator which is incredibly powerful and fights you every step of the way unless you're a pro and use it a lot (speaking from the experience of my group at work and myself).
It is a frustrating situation.
 Signature -- Lou Pecora
Jolly Roger - 28 Nov 2007 18:33 GMT > Have not > really tried Intaglio, although it gets good reviews. I purchased Intaglio as part of a http://macupdate.com promotion, and it's great. It's a top-notch drawing application - worth every penny.
 Signature Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. If you must contact me through e-mail, let me know when you send email to this address so that your email doesn't get eaten by my SPAM filter.
JR
Lou Pecora - 28 Nov 2007 21:53 GMT In article <jollyroger-2DCBB3.12330428112007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
> > Have not > > really tried Intaglio, although it gets good reviews. > > I purchased Intaglio as part of a http://macupdate.com promotion, and > it's great. It's a top-notch drawing application - worth every penny. Interesting. Worth looking at. How long has it been around? Any idea how big the customer base is? The latter may be hard to answer without inside info. But thanks for the feedback.
 Signature -- Lou Pecora
Gregory Weston - 29 Nov 2007 00:57 GMT > In article > <jollyroger-2DCBB3.12330428112007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > how big the customer base is? The latter may be hard to answer without > inside info. But thanks for the feedback. v1.0.1 came out in April 2003.
The current version came out 3 months ago and has over 4000 combined downloads from the 2 largest software update sites. I'd imagine that for a mature app most of those are existing users upgrading. There may well be users who haven't upgraded for some reason (perhaps running an older OS version that isn't supported by the latest build) and of course there are other places to get it besides MU and VT. The vendor's site likely sees significant traffic, for example. I know that I get a lot of my downloads through my own pages, as a result of links from bloggers and such.
Frédérique & Her vé Sainct - 29 Nov 2007 07:20 GMT > v1.0.1 came out in April 2003. > The current version came out 3 months ago (...) Intaglio is very active and regularly publishing upgrades; now, you have to be aware that the current version is 2.9.6 and there will probably be an upgrade fee when the'll switch to 3.0 (a beta version is already circulating if I believe their web forums), unless maybe for those just having bought in the last months.
This said, Intaglio as it is now is really excellent, and very efficient even for the casual user (that don't want to retain complicated procedures). I have been a happy user almost from day one, and I rebought it for my sons when they left home :-)
Hervé
 Signature Frédérique & Hervé Sainct, h.sainct@laposte.net [fr,es,en,it] Frédérique's initial is missing in front of the above address l'initiale de Frédérique manque devant l'adresse email ci-dessus
patrick j - 23 Dec 2007 10:50 GMT On Nov 29, 2007 Frédérique & Hervé Sainct wrote:
> This said, Intaglio as it is now is really excellent, and very efficient > even for the casual user (that don't want to retain complicated > procedures). I have been a happy user almost from day one, and I > rebought it for my sons when they left home :-) I'm another very happy Intaglio user. It is a lovely program to use, very efficient and simple.
I do have Adobe Illustrator but more often I use Intaglio simply because I find it so easy to use.
 Signature Patrick - Brighton, UK If you wish email me from my web-site: <http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>
Frédérique & Her vé Sainct - 28 Nov 2007 19:31 GMT > I did not try it yet - is it as simple and as powerful as MacDraw was, > 20 years ago? if you want the MacDraw of today in all its simplicity with the power of today (gulps almost any format from fossils to vectorial pdf), a single name: Intaglio
 Signature Frédérique & Hervé Sainct, h.sainct@laposte.net [fr,es,en,it] Frédérique's initial is missing in front of the above address l'initiale de Frédérique manque devant l'adresse email ci-dessus
Bill - 29 Nov 2007 11:26 GMT > > In article <slrnfkqgme.smd.t-use@ID-685.user.individual.de>, > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > - Martin i have not mastered it. It is not as easy as drawing in Appleworks. Never used MacDraw so can't compare.
Bill - 29 Nov 2007 11:42 GMT In article <bbcollins-7DFDC3.06265529112007@032-478-847.area7.spcsdns.net>,
> > > In article <slrnfkqgme.smd.t-use@ID-685.user.individual.de>, > > > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > i have not mastered it. It is not as easy as drawing in Appleworks. > Never used MacDraw so can't compare. There is also Google Sketchup. I have not used it much, but enough to know it does provide for drawing. It is free. Look for it on Google
Bill - 29 Nov 2007 13:28 GMT In article <bbcollins-6B506E.06425029112007@032-478-847.area7.spcsdns.net>,
> In article > <bbcollins-7DFDC3.06265529112007@032-478-847.area7.spcsdns.net>, [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > There is also Google Sketchup. I have not used it much, but enough to > know it does provide for drawing. It is free. Look for it on Google GraphicConverter is the Swiss Army Knife of image processing for the Mac. Can convert all kinds of images into other kinds, and do pretty capable image editing. Not as powerful as Photoshop perhaps, but a lot cheaper ($35 shareware) and easy to use. For image editing and conversion, not drawing. Can also be used as an image browser instead of iPhoto (was around long before iPhoto came along)
CADintosh is a good 2-D drafting program from the same source as GraphicConverter. Also shareware, $30.
Trial version of both available.
See http://www.lemkesoft.com/
Martin Trautmann - 29 Nov 2007 13:39 GMT > GraphicConverter is the Swiss Army Knife of image processing for the > Mac. Can convert all kinds of images into other kinds, and do pretty > capable image editing. I checked it recently since I wanted to edit a PDF I got. It failed miserably (latest trial version). I went back to a 200% screenshot which I edited on pixel size.
- Martin
Mr. Strat - 29 Nov 2007 17:02 GMT > > GraphicConverter is the Swiss Army Knife of image processing for the > > Mac. Can convert all kinds of images into other kinds, and do pretty [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > miserably (latest trial version). I went back to a 200% screenshot which > I edited on pixel size. Do you have any understanding of technology?
Martin Trautmann - 29 Nov 2007 17:25 GMT > In article <slrnfktg82.oq0.t-use@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin > Trautmann <t-use@gmx.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Do you have any understanding of technology? No, what for? A swiss army knife would be suitable to open almost anything - apart from T8 or other torx which is located on many Macs.
Personally, I expected that GC might be able to open PDF or PostScript at a certain level of quality - it's just a simple, unprotected PDF which can be handled by any printer driver, many pdf viewers etc. http://www.polizei.propk.de/file_service/download/documents/aufkleber.pdf
I'd be happy enough if GC would have done what I did: take a 100 % screenshot. However, GC told me that it could open it (good, isn't it?), but then presented an image as poor as a thumbnail.
I don't know about PDF and its technology. The image appeared worse than anything that would have been available from an .eps preview (was it the same?).
So GC could not do what I expected from it - and PDF handling should be one of the major tasks on Macs nowadays.
Mr. Strat - 29 Nov 2007 18:12 GMT > No, what for? A swiss army knife would be suitable to open almost > anything - apart from T8 or other torx which is located on many Macs. GraphicConverter is for working with graphics. Is a PDF the same as a JPG, GIF, or TIFF? Do you know of any other graphics program that lets you edit PDFs? Do you understand the purpose of PDFs?
Martin Trautmann - 29 Nov 2007 18:33 GMT > In article <slrnfkttgb.21t.t-use@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin > Trautmann <t-use@gmx.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > GraphicConverter is for working with graphics. Is a PDF the same as a > JPG, GIF, or TIFF? No, a PDF is not the same as a JPG, GIF or TIFF. Did I claim it was? Is this all which GC does handle? Is it possible that a PDF does contain a JPG, GIF or TIFF?
> Do you know of any other graphics program that lets > you edit PDFs? Since there are many programs which may handle postscript, I'd assume the same, more or less, for PDFs.
> Do you understand the purpose of PDFs? It's a suitable exchange format which may contain e.g. text and images ... or GRAPHICS.
EVERYTHING what you can see on the screen can be thought of as same kind of graphics. You do work with a braille terminal? Your PC did not get a GPU?
Martin Trautmann - 29 Nov 2007 18:37 GMT > > GraphicConverter is for working with graphics. Is a PDF the same as a > > JPG, GIF, or TIFF? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Is this all which GC does handle? > Is it possible that a PDF does contain a JPG, GIF or TIFF? BTW: please check <http://www.lemkesoft.com/content/143/import-and-export-formats.html>
Why should GC name "PDF" here if it would not contain graphics?
However, the spec is true: "exports only raster PDFs"... which means, it got a very poor raster image of a PDF which is opened.
Mr. Strat - 29 Nov 2007 19:55 GMT > No, a PDF is not the same as a JPG, GIF or TIFF. > Did I claim it was? > Is this all which GC does handle? > Is it possible that a PDF does contain a JPG, GIF or TIFF? Why would a graphics program allow you to edit a PDF? They're two entirely different things.
> Since there are many programs which may handle postscript, I'd assume > the same, more or less, for PDFs. Well, you assumed wrong.
> > Do you understand the purpose of PDFs? > > It's a suitable exchange format which may contain e.g. text and images > ... or GRAPHICS. PDFs may contain graphics, but you can't edit a Word document that contains graphics with GC either. You still need a clue.
> EVERYTHING what you can see on the screen can be thought of as same kind > of graphics. You do work with a braille terminal? Your PC did not get a > GPU? Here's a quarter. Go buy yourself a clue.
Frédérique & Her vé Sainct - 29 Nov 2007 17:56 GMT > I checked it recently since I wanted to edit a PDF I got. Intaglio edits pdfs vectorially, i. e. (if the pdf is properly created in the beginning) you don't lose any resolution in editing, can separate, move and resize graphic elements, etc.
 Signature Frédérique & Hervé Sainct, h.sainct@laposte.net [fr,es,en,it] Frédérique's initial is missing in front of the above address l'initiale de Frédérique manque devant l'adresse email ci-dessus
arvimide@earthlink.net - 29 Nov 2007 22:56 GMT >> GraphicConverter is the Swiss Army Knife of image processing for the >> Mac. Can convert all kinds of images into other kinds, and do pretty [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > miserably (latest trial version). I went back to a 200% screenshot which > I edited on pixel size. A .pdf-formatted file is not a graphic file, although it can contain graphics. It is more like a layout file and for practical purposes is a multifaceted sort of text file. You can only edit the graphic files destined for a .pdf in a graphics program, then construct the .pdf with the new graphic files. Programs for editing .pdf's are something entirely different, and Graphic Converter makes no pretensions of being such a program, but it can edit graphic files before they are (re)inserted in a file that is eventually saved as .pdf.
 Signature ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++
||Arnold VICTOR, New York City, i. e., <arvimideQ@Wearthlink.net> || ||Arnoldo VIKTORO, Nov-jorkurbo, t. e., <arvimideQ@Wearthlink.net> || ||Remove capital letters from e-mail address for correct address/ || || Forigu majusklajn literojn el e-poŝta adreso por ĝusta adreso || ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++ NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse or protection.
Frédérique & Her vé Sainct - 30 Nov 2007 07:25 GMT > You can only edit the graphic files destined for a .pdf in a graphics > program, then construct the .pdf with the new graphic files. While this is generally (and originally) true, there indeed are some applications that let you edit pdfs in wysiwig mode, like the costly adobe ones, costly graphic packages like Canvas, ligheter graphics packages like Intaglio, and a german "pdf-specific" series of applications that you can find at pdf-office: http://shop.pdf-office.com/index.php?cPath=32&osCsid=ca6d10b92a82e04056f 75bbd0bc0d436 Now, pdf-office is *really* oriented towards pdf editing and only this (but lots of, possibly with formula entries, etc.), when the others are more general (and, in the case of Intaglio at least, easier). Basically, it depends on your needs (simple and occasional vs daily and heavy)
 Signature Frédérique & Hervé Sainct, h.sainct@laposte.net [fr,es,en,it] Frédérique's initial is missing in front of the above address l'initiale de Frédérique manque devant l'adresse email ci-dessus
arvimide@earthlink.net - 30 Nov 2007 10:03 GMT Frédérique & Hervé Sainct wrote:
>> You can only edit the graphic files destined for a .pdf in a graphics >> program, then construct the .pdf with the new graphic files. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Basically, it depends on your needs (simple and occasional vs daily and > heavy) I stand corrected. I am out of my depth, as I only meant to deflate the OP's expectations of Graphic Converter, which I found excessive.
 Signature ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++
||Arnold VICTOR, New York City, i. e., <arvimideQ@Wearthlink.net> || ||Arnoldo VIKTORO, Nov-jorkurbo, t. e., <arvimideQ@Wearthlink.net> || ||Remove capital letters from e-mail address for correct address/ || || Forigu majusklajn literojn el e-poŝta adreso por ĝusta adreso || ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++ NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse or protection.
Frédérique & Her vé Sainct - 30 Nov 2007 17:53 GMT > (...) I only meant to deflate the OP's expectations of Graphic Converter, > which I found excessive. I agree on this concerning pdfs
 Signature Frédérique & Hervé Sainct, h.sainct@laposte.net [fr,es,en,it] Frédérique's initial is missing in front of the above address l'initiale de Frédérique manque devant l'adresse email ci-dessus
Martin Trautmann - 30 Nov 2007 10:19 GMT > >> GraphicConverter is the Swiss Army Knife of image processing for the > >> Mac. Can convert all kinds of images into other kinds, and do pretty [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > such a program, but it can edit graphic files before they are > (re)inserted in a file that is eventually saved as .pdf. I don't know any real program yet that would permit to re-edit a PDF as text as if it was the original word file.
What I would expect from a reasonable graphic converter is to render a .pdf reasonably well - e.g. converting it to a raster image file with sufficient resolution.
What I would expect from a good graphics tool, concerning text, would be to take every single character, identify its charset, size and location and convert this, character by character, to a suitable vector format. (assuming that the pdf actually does contain text and font info, not only a rasterized/scanned image of text)
A really good tool would be able to merge single characters not only to words and lines, but maybe to real text blocks.
When you check e.g. for tools such as pdf2html, pdf2tex or pdf2rtf, you will see that there are certain applications, both commercial and freeware, which are able to get this done.
But what I got here was an image only.
What I did expect from GraphicConverter, which TOLD me that it could open a PDF, was some suitable format for handling. I expected, what I did afterwards manually: I openend the image by a PDF reader, zoomed it to 200 %, made a screenshot and then edited this screenshot raster image by a graphics tool.
I never asked for a perfect open and handling of the PDF, as if it was the real document.
Did you check the URL that I sent? http://www.polizei-beratung.de/file_service/download/documents/aufkleber.pdf Did you give it a try how it looks like in GC or other tools?
What I did by now: I called pdfimages, a small tool which is part of the xpdf package from Glyph http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/README pdfimages -- extracts the images from a PDF file ... it will extract every single image object within a PDF to an image file of its own.
From the result I get the feeling that this image is a precise 1:1 copy of the used image: 748 x 237 pixel, 24 bits RGB, reduced from the PDF overhead, from 49522 to 42804 bytes file size. That's what I call a perfect processing of this PDF file. I don't have the results from GC around. I just tried gimp 2.0 for this task - I feel it's better than GC, resulting in 374 x 119 pixels and 13582 bytes file size.
I use pdf2txt from this xpdf package many times - I see how well it is possible to extract text from a pdf, just to a layout with simple .txt output.
So I know about some current possibilities how to handle PDFs, by some excellent and free tools, without the need of a full Adobe AcroAnything professional tool.
Do you feel GC is suitable at all for this job? Could it do this job better? I feel that it should be able to get this done, and better than it does. I never said that I would expect to handle every content from any PDF format.
- Martin
arvimide@earthlink.net - 30 Nov 2007 09:59 GMT >>>> GraphicConverter is the Swiss Army Knife of image processing for the >>>> Mac. Can convert all kinds of images into other kinds, and do pretty [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > ..pdf reasonably well - e.g. converting it to a raster image file with > sufficient resolution. Your expectations are unrealistic. Being able to open a .pdf-file is not an indicator of being able to edit it.
> What I would expect from a good graphics tool, concerning text, would be > to take every single character, identify its charset, size and location [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > http://www.polizei-beratung.de/file_service/download/documents/aufkleber.pdf > Did you give it a try how it looks like in GC or other tools? Yes, I opened it with Graphic Converter, but GC asked for information not delivered in .pdf-format, indicating to me what was lacking for editing purposes. It would never have occurred to me to use GC on a .pdf-file for any purpose.
> What I did by now: I called pdfimages, a small tool which is part > of the xpdf package from Glyph [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > it does. I never said that I would expect to handle every content from > any PDF format. No, I wouldn't try it for graphic or text already formatted for .pdf, only for the constituent graphics before .pdf-formatting, and never for text. But there are tools which can, within limits, edit constituent parts of a .pdf, as indicated by other posters to this thread.
 Signature ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++
||Arnold VICTOR, New York City, i. e., <arvimideQ@Wearthlink.net> || ||Arnoldo VIKTORO, Nov-jorkurbo, t. e., <arvimideQ@Wearthlink.net> || ||Remove capital letters from e-mail address for correct address/ || || Forigu majusklajn literojn el e-poŝta adreso por ĝusta adreso || ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++ NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse or protection.
Martin Trautmann - 29 Nov 2007 13:37 GMT > There is also Google Sketchup. I have not used it much, but enough to > know it does provide for drawing. It is free. Look for it on Google I LOVE Sketchup - great for some very fast 3d success.
However, it's mainly a 3d tool. It's difficult to align and zoom stuff, you have to do it right from the beginning.
I do expect that I may draw something at a suitable size and use it within a document at e.g. 25 % - which failed most within AppleWorks.
By current standards I would expect that I could zoom down to 3.75 % and could fix problems later on, zoomed up to 5000 % (which is 187,5 % of the original size), within a different application and still proper alignment of intersections...
John Yates - 28 Nov 2007 07:15 GMT Stan Robinson wrote:
> Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Stan. NeoOffice - open source, fully featured http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php
Countryman - 28 Nov 2007 08:48 GMT > Stan Robinson wrote: >> Hi, [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > NeoOffice - open source, fully featured > http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php I second Neo.
Jeffrey Goldberg - 28 Nov 2007 13:31 GMT >> NeoOffice - open source, fully featured >> http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php > > I second Neo. I'm probably not a good judge of things because I dislike word processors in the first place, but I find the word processor in NeoOffice awkward, sluggish and with frequent crashes.
I can't compare with MS-Word because I've never* used that. I do find Pages much less annoying.
The spread sheet within NeoOffice is more fully featured than Numbers, but again I haven't really gotten into much spread sheet usage.
-j
Notes:
*Well, hardly ever.
 Signature Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings. http://improve-usenet.org/
Fred Moore - 28 Nov 2007 17:51 GMT > >> NeoOffice - open source, fully featured > >> http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > in the first place, but I find the word processor in NeoOffice awkward, > sluggish and with frequent crashes. Hmm... Jeffery, what are you doing when NeoO crashes? Is it the same place most of the time. I have heard a few others mention crashes, but I have never had it crash on me and I've been using it since about v1.1. It is important to have the latest version and the latest patch. The current version is 2.2.2p1. Also, if you have recurring crashes, trashing the NeoO prefs (~/Library/Preferences/NeoOffice-<version>) is sometimes mentioned as a fix.
NeoO does run in Java so it takes a while to load, and saves of large docs takes a few seconds. I find speed during normal usage similar to M$ Office; sorts are usually fast.
> I can't compare with MS-Word because I've never* used that. I do find > Pages much less annoying. As to awkward, NeoO and its progenitor OpenOffice.org are meant to be full features knockoffs of M$ Office. These are very large, complicated programs. If you don't need all their features, by all means use something simpler. I have only taken the tour of Pages, not really used it; but it seems Apple has done its usual job of streamlining the interface. This may work for you or most folks. However, if you need all the whistles and bells or if you just want to try out a completely FREE office suite, NeoO is hard to beat.
> The spread sheet within NeoOffice is more fully featured than Numbers, but > again I haven't really gotten into much spread sheet usage. To address Martin's first comment, NeoO does have a vector drawing module that iWork doesn't. It's perhaps 60% of what Freehand is, but it _is_ free and all many people need.
Martin, I have high hopes for the OOo Mac version. However, presently it's still vaporware with only vague hints of delivery dates. Given the seemingly total lack of concern evidenced by the OOo development team for the Mac version up to now, I'm not holding my breath that OOo-Mac will be as good as NeoO any time in the usable future.
--Fred
Jeffrey Goldberg - 28 Nov 2007 22:29 GMT >> I'm probably not a good judge of things because I dislike word processors >> in the first place, but I find the word processor in NeoOffice awkward, >> sluggish and with frequent crashes. > > Hmm... Jeffery, what are you doing when NeoO crashes? It varies. The last one was when I'd tried to turn off display of rulers. Other times it is during a save or adding a style.
I should say that all of the documents that I've worked on were created with MS-Word by others.
> It is important to have the latest version and the latest patch. The > current version is 2.2.2p1. I do keep up with patches.
> Also, if you have recurring crashes, trashing the NeoO prefs > (~/Library/Preferences/NeoOffice-<version>) is sometimes mentioned as a > fix. I'll try that.
> NeoO does run in Java so it takes a while to load, and saves of large > docs takes a few seconds. I find speed during normal usage similar to M$ > Office; sorts are usually fast. I have no basis for comparison. I find that anything that opens a new window (like a style window) can really be slow.
>> I can't compare with MS-Word because I've never* used that. I do find >> Pages much less annoying. > > As to awkward, NeoO and its progenitor OpenOffice.org are meant to be > full features knockoffs of M$ Office. I am aware of this. I've used calc in OOo and have been very happy with that. I used to use Linux on my desktop before I switched to OS X, so I long familiarity with these tools, but since I don't do word processing (I use LaTeX for document preparation) I guess I am bound to find any word processor unpleasant.
> I have only taken the tour of Pages, not really used it; but it seems > Apple has done its usual job of streamlining the interface. This may > work for you or most folks. I produce the weekly newsletter for my daughter's school PTA. And I've found Pages perfectly fine for my abilities. That is, the limitations on what I've been able to do are my own and not Pages
> However, if you need all the whistles and > bells or if you just want to try out a completely FREE office suite, > NeoO is hard to beat. Let me also add that NeoOffice works natively with Open Document Format which is what the world should be using for exchange of word processor documents among people who may need to change the document. Of course if people don't need to change the document that PDF should be used for document exchange.
That is a big plus for NeoOffice or OpenOffice in my mind. Pages is yet another proprietary file format.
I haven't tried OOo under X11 on Leopard yet. I should give that another try.
-j
 Signature Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings. http://improve-usenet.org/
Fred Moore - 29 Nov 2007 15:46 GMT > > Hmm... Jeffery, what are you doing when NeoO crashes? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I should say that all of the documents that I've worked on were created > with MS-Word by others. Ah, this is at least part of the explanation. Microsoft, as usual, does a lot of sneaky, proprietary things with its format. Any converter can only do so much. The more complicated the doc, the more likely you are to have problems. I work mostly in Open Document format.
--Fred
Martin Trautmann - 28 Nov 2007 10:30 GMT > NeoOffice - open source, fully featured which runs under Java: slow startup, slow speed
Apart from the NeoOffice branch of OpenOffice there's either the latest OpenOffice versions, which need X11 and do not look like a Mac application.
Or there's the native Mac port of OpenOffice which is still in early development.
Matthew Lybanon - 28 Nov 2007 15:06 GMT > > NeoOffice - open source, fully featured > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Or there's the native Mac port of OpenOffice which is still in early > development. Slow startup, sometimes slow to load documents, but not particularly slow in operation (at least on a G5 Mac). Very nice to use, and it can both read and write in almost any format you can think of. And it has an Export as PDF ... option that seems to produce slightly better results than the Save as PDF ... command from the Mac print dialog.
It isn't perfect. But neither are the office suites you have to pay for.
Erik Richard Sørensen - 28 Nov 2007 22:57 GMT >> NeoOffice - open source, fully featured > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > OpenOffice versions, which need X11 and do not look like a Mac > application. Yes, Openoffice 2.3.0 is faster than Neooffice thoug it needs X11.
> Or there's the native Mac port of OpenOffice which is still in early > development. Yep! - still unstable in anything else than texprocessing, - no printing capabilities has been implemented yet, - but it's promising...
cheers, Erik Richard
 Signature ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rgds. Grüße, Mvh. Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC <mac-man_NOSP@M_stofanet.dk> <http://www.nisus.com> NisusWriter - The Future In Multilingual Textprocessing ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Erik Richard Sørensen - 28 Nov 2007 22:52 GMT Stan Robinson wrote:
> I have just purchased a new iMac and was surprised to discover the old > favourite "Apple Works" had disappeared? If you have the AWKS 6.2.x Cd, you can install it even on an IntelMac, and it'll work just fine and fast. - Use it mself on a MacPro...
> Would appreciate advice re a substitute for AW. Alternative could be: Openoffice 2,3.0 (freeware, req. X11) full-featured office productivity suite http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/10456 NeoOffice 2.2.2 (freeware, runs native) Full featured office package http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php
Cheers, Erik Richard
 Signature ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rgds. Grüße, Mvh. Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC <mac-man_NOSP@M_stofanet.dk> <http://www.nisus.com> NisusWriter - The Future In Multilingual Textprocessing ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beth C - 02 Dec 2007 02:31 GMT > Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Stan. Did you try any of the disks that came with the computer?? Maybe they just didnt bother pre installing that software for you?
David Empson - 02 Dec 2007 03:50 GMT > > I have just purchased a new iMac and was surprised to discover the old > > favourite "Apple Works" had disappeared? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Did you try any of the disks that came with the computer?? Maybe they > just didnt bother pre installing that software for you? iWork and Microsoft Office are supplied with new computers as time limited demos, but you have to buy the full version to allow them to keep running.
AppleWorks has not been included with new Macs for quite a while. It used to be included with "consumer" models (iMac, iBook, eMac) but not with "professional" models (PowerMac, PowerBook).
Quick survey - what's the latest model anyone has bought which came with AppleWorks as part of the preinstalled software bundle? I know it did come with my mid 2001 iBook G3, and didn't come with my flatmate's mid 2007 iMac (Intel).
I'm estimating that they dropped it some time in 2005 or 2006, possibly before the switch to Intel, but definitely no later than that.
 Signature David Empson dempson@actrix.gen.nz
Stan Robinson - 02 Dec 2007 06:31 GMT > > Hi, > > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Did you try any of the disks that came with the computer?? Maybe they > just didnt bother pre installing that software for you? ç
Mike Rosenberg - 02 Dec 2007 15:12 GMT > Did you try any of the disks that came with the computer?? Maybe they > just didnt bother pre installing that software for you? No, AppleWorks is history. Apple has officially replaced it with iWork, but they no longer even bundle a full version on new Macs, just a 30-day trial version.
 Signature <http://designsbymike.info/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.info/shop/musings.cgi> Muckraking T-shirts <http://designsbymike.info/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://bogart-tribute.net> Tribute to Humphrey Bogart
|
|
|