Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Mac Applications / May 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

WireTap vs Audio Hijack?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pumpkin Escobar - 07 May 2007 23:56 GMT
Looking for something to record some audio streams, and was leaning
toward purchasing Audio Hijack, but wondered if anyone liked WireTap
better.

I have Amadeus, so I don't think that I need Audio Hijack Pro for
editing.

Thanks,

PE
Paul - 08 May 2007 07:29 GMT
> Looking for something to record some audio streams, and was leaning
> toward purchasing Audio Hijack, but wondered if anyone liked WireTap
> better.

If my knowledge of these apps is still current, Audio Hijack is
superior because it can record from a single application. If you are
recording off RealPlayer, for example, Audio Hijack can record the
RealPlayer stream and exclude every other app on the system. WireTap,
on the other hand, might bring you lots of surprises. You use WireTap
to record RealPlayer, and you forget that you have Mail, Chat, and
other apps running, so when you listen to your WireTap recording you
don't just get your music, you also hear system beeps, new-mail
sounds, and chat alert noises inextricably embedded into your music.

It's possible that WireTap is smarter now, so you might want to verify
that.
gtr - 10 May 2007 20:39 GMT
>> Looking for something to record some audio streams, and was leaning
>> toward purchasing Audio Hijack, but wondered if anyone liked WireTap
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> It's possible that WireTap is smarter now, so you might want to verify
> that.

I'm an enthusiastic supporter of Audio Hi-Jack.  It has myriad
filtering, eq-ing pitch modification and such.  Jillions of plug-ins.

It can record FROM myriad programs and as indicated above, will isolate
audio incoming to that one program. You can configure a timer so that
it will record from a specific locale, websites, etc beginning and
ending at specific times, is fully apple-scriptable, can be used to
record podcats, from LP's, produces myriad output file types, in your
specified folders, and so forth.

The program is quite "mature", as they say.

I think both programs come in demo versions.  I suggest you try them.  
From the above you have at least two Wiretap fans that admit they don't
know Audio HiJack.  I know Audio HiJack and admit I don't know Wiretap.
So try them both and you tell US which is better!

Actually I like damned near everything programmed by Rogue.  That's a
big consideration for me: a company/programmer I have a lot of trust
and respect for.
Signature

Thank you and have a nice day.

Harold Burton - 14 May 2007 18:44 GMT
> > Looking for something to record some audio streams, and was leaning
> > toward purchasing Audio Hijack, but wondered if anyone liked WireTap
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> It's possible that WireTap is smarter now...

It's not.  I've been using it for a year or so and that's my only real
complaint.
Gamma - 09 May 2007 19:56 GMT
> Looking for something to record some audio streams, and was leaning
> toward purchasing Audio Hijack, but wondered if anyone liked WireTap
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> PE

I have a copy of Audio Hijack but have not used it so can't make a
comparison. I also have a copy of Wiretap Pro and I use it often and
like it. While I sit at my desk and work (in a country where I can't
speak the language) it helps to have an English-language radio station
playing to keep me company. (I choose 4KQ from Brisbane, Australia
because they play exactly my kind of music <http://4kq.com.au>)

I have Wiretap on my desktop so that, if I hear a song I like, it takes
only milliseconds to start the recording process. I have nothing
negative to say about it.
Lou Pecora - 10 May 2007 17:46 GMT
> > Looking for something to record some audio streams, and was leaning
> > toward purchasing Audio Hijack, but wondered if anyone liked WireTap
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> only milliseconds to start the recording process. I have nothing
> negative to say about it.

I will second WireTap.  Very nice.  However, I cannot compare to Audio
Hijack since I have never used the later.  Just a happy customer of WT.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.