>> In article
>> <droleary.usenet-400CB1.09261001052007@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>>> Anyone wanna guess how long until StuffIt becomes completely obsolete?
>>>> I'm picking late-ish 2008.
>>> I say you're off by at least 5 years. Look closer to 2003.
Heh.
>>> The fact that some people keep using it out of habit doesn't make
>>> it any less obsolete.
>> If I might (pardon my ignorance), what are the alternatives for
>> UNSTUFFING .sit archives?
The answer to that would be not creating the stupid things in the first
place.
> Why, there are no alternatives. That's sort of the point - the Stuffit
> file format is proprietary and requires the vendor's software to
> extract. That's why a lot of people are not creating new .sit files and
> instead using less risky formats like zip.
With the availability of high-speed internet it's all rather irrelevant
anyway - nearly every bit of software I download is packaged in dmg
format these days (which suits me just fine).
Cheers,
Andy.
Barry Margolin - 03 May 2007 00:48 GMT
In article
<46384965$0$17255$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
> >> If I might (pardon my ignorance), what are the alternatives for
> >> UNSTUFFING .sit archives?
>
> The answer to that would be not creating the stupid things in the first
> place.
The people doing the downloading don't have much say in this, except to
not patronize vendors who use it.

Signature
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***