> > I doesn't work. Go here instead <http://www.yepsoftware.com/>
>
> "Yep" seems to be a nice application, but you've misunderstood my
> needs. I'm not looking for a way to archive all my PDF files, but was
> hoping that I could put those PDFs related to my photos alongside the
> photos in iPhoto.
> > No need to speak in that tone. I did actually search the web, but
> > found no answers.
>
> I know - you already said that. You missed my point. I asked why you
> didn't just try it out yourself as you pretty much implied you didn't.
No, I tried that out first as I expected it to take PDF files, but was
surprised when it didn't.
> > Since iTunes takes PDFs I was a bit surprised to see
> > that iPhoto doesn't,
>
> PDF was added to iTunes to accommodate the use of digital booklets at
> the iTunes Store. iPhoto is not a catchall storage program and so Apple
> sees no need to make it one.
It wouldn't hurt to add that feature, or allow for plugins which would
allow others to make a PDF import feature.
Talking about a catchall program -are there good alternatives around
for iTunes and iPhoto? I'm quite happy with iTunes, but iPhoto is
extremely slow if you add more than a few hundred photos and has many
other problems which are frustrating.
One program that takes music, photos, text and PDF files etc. would be
nice.
And to be of any use it has to be fully featured for playing audio
files and viewing those other files.
> You can by opening the pdf in Preview and doing a "Save As..." and turn
> them into a JPEG or TIFF file.
Yes, I thought about that, but it's not that practical.
I'll give it a second go though and see how that works out for now.
Thanks for the suggestion, which I hadn't considered recently.
gtr - 29 Apr 2007 17:10 GMT
> One program that takes music, photos, text and PDF files etc. would be
> nice. And to be of any use it has to be fully featured for playing
> audio files and viewing those other files.
DevonThink, of which I am a loygal user, does just that. It has a
number of "etc" too, but that reference leaves your demands a bit open.
It won't store everything, I would imagine. It also doesn't
read/display the mp3 tags quite yet, but assume it will eventually.

Signature
Thank you and have a nice day.
Jim Redelfs - 02 May 2007 13:30 GMT
In article <1177579817.994146.206580@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
> I'm using iPhoto 5.0.4 and MacOS 10.4.9 on a G4 Powerbook.
> iPhoto is extremely slow if you add more than a few hundred photos
> and has many other problems which are frustrating.
You would do well to upgrade to iPhoto v6.0.6
I buy every release of the iLife suite JUST for iPhoto. I'm sure there are
many that the new release mostly for the new version of their favorite app.
There are 6842 items in my iPhoto library. I get the "pizza wheel" for a
couple or three seconds while they load when the app is first opened.
However, once up-and-running, iPhoto 6 is plenty snappy on my 1.25
single-processor G4. I do, however, have 2gb RAM and a 250gb disk that is
only slightly over half-full.
If the lack of native pdf-handling is a deal-breaker, you should look
elsewhere. If iPhoto does other things that you like, you might look into
upgrading your system (if possible) to help it do its thing. Good luck!

Signature
:)
JR
PowerMac G4 MDD 1.25 SP
Mac OS X 10.4.9
AES - 02 May 2007 20:14 GMT
In article
<jim.redelfs-B535F2.07303902052007@news.lga.highwinds-media.com>,
> If the lack of native pdf-handling is a deal-breaker, you should look
> elsewhere. If iPhoto does other things that you like, you might look into
> upgrading your system (if possible) to help it do its thing. Good luck!
I started off using the ancestral version of iView MediaPro long ago
(long before iPhoto) as my primary catalog for both photos and even more
for technical graphics (eps, pdf, png, etc); have used it thru many
versions; and have come to know it well, and trust and like it.
I'm saying this not to push it, but more to ask anyone who's used both
it and iPhoto: Any good reasons for me to look into converting to
iPhoto instead?
sbt - 02 May 2007 21:31 GMT
> In article
> <jim.redelfs-B535F2.07303902052007@news.lga.highwinds-media.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> it and iPhoto: Any good reasons for me to look into converting to
> iPhoto instead?
To me, it's not an either-or -- I use both. The iView products are
great archiving and cataloging tools. iPhoto is more geared toward
using and repurposing the content. With my girlfriend's large family
(two kids, 10 grandkids) as source for literally a couple thousand
photos a year that she wants in slideshows, printed albums, individual
prints, adornments for Web pages, and the like, we use iPhoto for
current material and then archive the photos to CD and DVD using iView
for the cataloging, clearing up disk space for the new material that
keeps coming in.

Signature
Spenser
>>> In article <1177579817.994146.206...@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I know - you already said that. You missed my point. I asked why you
> didn't just try it out yourself as you pretty much implied you didn't.
He didn't imply that he hadn't tried it himself. You apparently
inferred it though.

Signature
JR