Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Mac Applications / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

double-click rebuilding of desktop on OS 9?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
THO - 13 Jan 2007 15:40 GMT
Is there a software tool or an Applescript technique to rebuild the Mac
desktop through just launching the software? I'm using Techtool Light
but it has a bizarre interface which has a bunch of steps before you can
actually rebuild the desktop.

Thanks.
nospam - 13 Jan 2007 15:51 GMT
> Is there a software tool or an Applescript technique to rebuild the Mac
> desktop through just launching the software? I'm using Techtool Light
> but it has a bizarre interface which has a bunch of steps before you can
> actually rebuild the desktop.
>
> Thanks.

It's a while since I did this, but Techtool actually deletes the Desktop
DB and DF invisible files, forcing them to be re-built. I think the
usual way (which I can't remmeber now) does something else which isn't
as good. All you'd need is an applescript that deletes those 2 files,
then reboots.

Andy
patrick j - 13 Jan 2007 17:35 GMT
>> Is there a software tool or an Applescript technique to rebuild the Mac
>> desktop through just launching the software? I'm using Techtool Light
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> as good. All you'd need is an applescript that deletes those 2 files,
> then reboots.

Hi

I think the usual way, holding down command and option keys at start
up, works just as well as deleting the DB and DF invisible files.

With OS 7.6 and earlier the comments for each file would be lost but
with OS 8 and 9 I think they would be retained, IIRC.

Signature

Patrick
Brighton, UK

<http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>

Mike Rosenberg - 13 Jan 2007 22:00 GMT
> I think the usual way, holding down command and option keys at start
> up, works just as well as deleting the DB and DF invisible files.

No, it doesn't.  The Apple method patches the database whereas the
deletion method recreates it from scratch.

Signature

<http://designsbymike.biz/macconsultshop.shtml> Mac-themed T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/musings.shtml> Mostly muckraking T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/prius.shtml> Prius shirts & bumper stickers
<http://cafepress.com/comedancing> Ballroom dance-themed shirts & gift

patrick j - 13 Jan 2007 22:14 GMT
>> I think the usual way, holding down command and option keys at start
>> up, works just as well as deleting the DB and DF invisible files.
>
> No, it doesn't.  The Apple method patches the database whereas the
> deletion method recreates it from scratch.

I think it does work just as well.

Signature

Patrick
Brighton, UK

<http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>

Mike Rosenberg - 13 Jan 2007 22:37 GMT
> >> I think the usual way, holding down command and option keys at start
> >> up, works just as well as deleting the DB and DF invisible files.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I think it does work just as well.

I've already specified the reason why the deletion method is technically
superior.  It will _always_ work as long as the drive's directories are
sound, whereas the Apple method will not always work and can even create
additional problems.

Signature

<http://designsbymike.biz/macconsultshop.shtml> Mac-themed T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/musings.shtml> Mostly muckraking T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/prius.shtml> Prius shirts & bumper stickers
<http://cafepress.com/comedancing> Ballroom dance-themed shirts & gift

patrick j - 14 Jan 2007 00:14 GMT
> I've already specified the reason why the deletion method is technically
> superior.  It will _always_ work as long as the drive's directories are
> sound, whereas the Apple method will not always work and can even create
> additional problems.

Have you experienced these problems?

If the directories are sound both methods work fine.

It is true that either rebuilding or repairing the desktop files will
create additional problems if the directories are not sound.

This is as true of either method.

It is as they say six of one and half a dozen of the other which method
you use.

On the subject of rebuilding or repairing the desktop files to the
original poster I suggest that he/she first runs a good disk utility
over the whole computer and make sure it is all as it should be. Then
do the repair/rebuild of the desktop files if considered necessary.

The Apple method will work just as well as the other one being
suggested which requires a script or a third party utility.

It is a long-standing myth that the other method which is deleting the
hidden desktop files and thus having the OS forced to rebuild them is
better. It isn't worse, but it's not better.

The repairing/rebuilding of the hidden desktop files is not needed very
frequently and with the later OSes, such as 8 and 9, never doing it at
all is usually fine.

If you find you need to do it frequently then it does suggest something
is wrong.

I'm going to cut and paste this response of mine into one other poor
soul who is upset that the old "rebuild is better than patching" myth
isn't true after all.

However I'm not going to be participating in the thread after that
because it's not very interesting having this discussion again.

If it is important to these people that the myth continues then let
them be happy :)

Signature

Patrick
Brighton, UK

<http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>

Mike Rosenberg - 14 Jan 2007 02:21 GMT
> > I've already specified the reason why the deletion method is technically
> > superior.  It will _always_ work as long as the drive's directories are
> > sound, whereas the Apple method will not always work and can even create
> > additional problems.
>
> Have you experienced these problems?

Yes.

> If the directories are sound both methods work fine.

No, that's simply not true.  If the desktop database is corrupted,
rebuilding it using the Apple method can make the problem worse, whereas
using the deletion method creates a new, aproblematic, one.

> It is a long-standing myth that the other method which is deleting the
> hidden desktop files and thus having the OS forced to rebuild them is
> better. It isn't worse, but it's not better.

You're simply wrong.  I've had several occasions in which the Apple
method either did not fix the problem or made it worse, but then using
the deletion method (via Tech Tool) fixed everything.  These involved
drives on which I had already run Disk Warrior (or another utility prior
to DW's existance).

> If it is important to these people that the myth continues then let
> them be happy :)

If it's important to you to believe it's a myth, so be it, but please
don't advise others to use an inferior method without informing them of
this.

Signature

<http://designsbymike.biz/macconsultshop.shtml> Mac-themed T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/musings.shtml> Mostly muckraking T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/prius.shtml> Prius shirts & bumper stickers
<http://cafepress.com/comedancing> Ballroom dance-themed shirts & gift

Jolly Roger - 13 Jan 2007 23:23 GMT
>>> I think the usual way, holding down command and option keys at start
>>> up, works just as well as deleting the DB and DF invisible files.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I think it does work just as well.

Unfortunately, it doesn't always work as well. There are cases where
the database is corrupt in such a way that simply rebuilding the
existing database does not correct the problem. This is a
well-established fact, and is well-known among those of us who have
been around long enough to have made regular use of Macs back in the
days before Mac OS 9 and X.

Signature

JR

patrick j - 14 Jan 2007 00:14 GMT
>>>> I think the usual way, holding down command and option keys at start
>>>> up, works just as well as deleting the DB and DF invisible files.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> been around long enough to have made regular use of Macs back in the
> days before Mac OS 9 and X.

Well I have indeed been using Macs since long before OS 9 and X :)

If the directories are sound both methods work fine.

It is true that either rebuilding or repairing the desktop files will
create additional problems if the directories are not sound.

This is as true of either method.

It is as they say six of one and half a dozen of the other which method
you use.

On the subject of rebuilding or repairing the desktop files to the
original poster I suggest that he/she first runs a good disk utility
over the whole computer and make sure it is all as it should be. Then
do the repair/rebuild of the desktop files if considered necessary.

The Apple method will work just as well as the other one being
suggested which requires a script or a third party utility.

It is a long-standing myth that the other method which is deleting the
hidden desktop files and thus having the OS forced to rebuild them is
better. It isn't worse, but it's not better.

The repairing/rebuilding of the hidden desktop files is not needed very
frequently and with the later OSes, such as 8 and 9, never doing it at
all is usually fine.

If you find you need to do it frequently then it does suggest something
is wrong.

I'm not going to be participating in the thread after this because it's
not very interesting having this discussion again.

If it is important to people that the myth continues then let them be
happy :)

Signature

Patrick
Brighton, UK

<http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>

Jolly Roger - 14 Jan 2007 01:37 GMT
>>>>> I think the usual way, holding down command and option keys at start
>>>>> up, works just as well as deleting the DB and DF invisible files.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> If the directories are sound both methods work fine.

The only way I know how to put it is: You're wrong.  I hope that's not
too harsh - it's the truth regardless.

When you do a simple desktop rebuild, the system removes all Desktop DB
records for applications that no longer exist on the system, but leaves
intact any Desktop DB records for applications that are still currently
installed on your system.  If one such entry is corrupted, after a
rebuild of the Desktop DB, the problem entry still remains.

One classic symptom of this (there are others as well, of course) is a
document or application whose icon is corrupt (usually a seemingly
random mix of colored bits) even after a normal "rebuild" of the
desktop.  I've personally had such a problem on multiple occasions in
the past, and deleting the Desktop DB and Desktop DF files, resulting
in a clean rebuild, fixed it each time.

Signature

JR

Mike Rosenberg - 14 Jan 2007 02:21 GMT
> When you do a simple desktop rebuild, the system removes all Desktop DB
> records for applications that no longer exist on the system, but leaves
> intact any Desktop DB records for applications that are still currently
> installed on your system.  If one such entry is corrupted, after a
> rebuild of the Desktop DB, the problem entry still remains.

And, if the DB is sufficiently corrupted to begin with, it may become
worse.  I've seen _all_ icons go generic a couple of times when the
computer froze during the rebuilding process.

Signature

<http://designsbymike.biz/macconsultshop.shtml> Mac-themed T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/musings.shtml> Mostly muckraking T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/prius.shtml> Prius shirts & bumper stickers
<http://cafepress.com/comedancing> Ballroom dance-themed shirts & gift

Jolly Roger - 14 Jan 2007 02:31 GMT
>> When you do a simple desktop rebuild, the system removes all Desktop DB
>> records for applications that no longer exist on the system, but leaves
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> worse.  I've seen _all_ icons go generic a couple of times when the
> computer froze during the rebuilding process.

Come to think of it, so have I.  And I could always count on deleting
the Desktop DB and Desktop DF files fixing that problem as well.

Signature

JR

Dave Balderstone - 14 Jan 2007 04:59 GMT
> >> When you do a simple desktop rebuild, the system removes all Desktop DB
> >> records for applications that no longer exist on the system, but leaves
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Come to think of it, so have I.  And I could always count on deleting
> the Desktop DB and Desktop DF files fixing that problem as well.

Can I say "Me too"?

Me too.
Dave Balderstone - 14 Jan 2007 04:59 GMT
> When you do a simple desktop rebuild, the system removes all Desktop DB
> records for applications that no longer exist on the system, but leaves
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the past, and deleting the Desktop DB and Desktop DF files, resulting
> in a clean rebuild, fixed it each time.

Testify.

I can confirm all of this, based on my experience doing tech support
from System 6.0.1 to present day.
Jolly Roger - 13 Jan 2007 17:46 GMT
> Is there a software tool or an Applescript technique to rebuild the Mac
> desktop through just launching the software? I'm using Techtool Light
> but it has a bizarre interface which has a bunch of steps before you
> can actually rebuild the desktop.
>
> Thanks.

Sure.  Enter this script into Script Editor in Mac OS 9 (watch for line
wraps introduced by news readers!):

-- begin script
>> property pRemoveItems : {"Desktop DB", "Desktop DF"}
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>>>>     return theParOffset
>> end OffsetInList
-- end script

Save the script as an application.

Then double-click it to run it. The next time you restart your
computer, the desktop databases will be rebuilt.

Signature

JR

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.