Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Mac Applications / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Can a software made for MacOS 10.3.x work also in 10.2.x?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Max - 18 Nov 2006 23:30 GMT
Hi at all

I'm sorry for the stupid question but I'm not a Mac expert so I'm
tring to ask to people knowing more than me about this argument.
I need to make an internet voice call (voip) with a person using a
MacOS version 10.2.8 (I'm working with Windows at the moment). The
Skype version for macos require as minimun version the 10.3 or higher
than it seem not possible to use this version in a older 10.2 macos.
I'm tring to find another voip pc-tp-pc software having multiplatform
version for Windows and mac but I noticed that all these software for
mac need the 10.3 version as minimun requirements. Are these two
version so different? Could the macos Skype version work also in the
old 10.2 version? and, if no, someone know a software voip pc-to-pc
having the two required version Windows and macos 10.2 or higher?
Thank you
Max
John101 - 19 Nov 2006 00:03 GMT
> Are these two
> version so different?

Yes

> Could the macos Skype version work also in the
> old 10.2 version?

No

> and, if no, someone know a software voip pc-to-pc
> having the two required version Windows and macos 10.2 or higher?

No

Signature

To reply, substitute .com for .invalid in address, i.e., john.101a (at)
 yahoo.com

Tom Harrington - 19 Nov 2006 00:07 GMT
> Hi at all
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> old 10.2 version? and, if no, someone know a software voip pc-to-pc
> having the two required version Windows and macos 10.2 or higher?

If the software says it needs at least 10.3, then it's extremely
unlikely that it'll work with 10.2.  With every major update to Mac OS
X, Apple adds new features for software developers.  Requiring 10.3
probably means that the software uses features introduced in 10.3.

Signature

Tom "Tom" Harrington
MondoMouse makes your mouse mightier
See http://www.atomicbird.com/mondomouse/

Richard Maine - 19 Nov 2006 00:46 GMT
> I'm not a Mac expert
...
> The
> Skype version for macos require as minimun version the 10.3 or higher
...
> Could the macos Skype version work also in the
> old 10.2 version?

I'm a little puzzled as to why you think it would take a Mac expert to
understand that 10.2 is not "10.3 or higher". That would seem to require
understanding only English and numbers. If they say it requires 10.3 or
higher, then they are probably telling the truth. If you want to go into
the technical reasons for the requirement, that would be another matter.
That part does require at least a bit of Mac expertise, and it also
isn't going to help you.

Signature

Richard Maine                    | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle           |  -- Mark Twain

John W Gintell - 19 Nov 2006 04:00 GMT
>> I'm not a Mac expert
> ...
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> That part does require at least a bit of Mac expertise, and it also
> isn't going to help you.

Sometimes the vendor says it works in release X or higher because that
is what they did their testing on. It might well be true that it works
on a prior release as well.
:/ - 19 Nov 2006 05:56 GMT
>>> I'm not a Mac expert
>> ...
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> is what they did their testing on. It might well be true that it works
> on a prior release as well.

Most developers release an app that is tested across various versions.
Also, when you make an app with the developer tools, it informs you
which and what OS's it can be used on. Apple designed this to be easy,
the aren't airheads.
Jamie Kahn Genet - 19 Nov 2006 01:15 GMT
> Hi at all
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thank you
> Max

Copies of Panther (10.3) are very cheap on Ebay nowadays. Why not simply
buy as many as you need for the pittance they're now selling for?

Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
Signature

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Max - 19 Nov 2006 11:59 GMT
Hi,

>Copies of Panther (10.3) are very cheap on Ebay nowadays. Why not simply
>buy as many as you need for the pittance they're now selling for?

Because I don't know exactly how mac hardware work. I mean, I think
like a Windows user. If a computer have Windows 98 (for example) this
could probabily mean that it have and old hardware so if you try to
install Windows XP (always as example) could have some problems
because the hardware is not so good to run this "fat" operating
system. Is this situation similar to mac? The new 10.3 version can be
installed to and old computer (around three years old) without
probems?
Thank you
Max
Jon - 19 Nov 2006 12:28 GMT
> The new 10.3 version can be
> installed to and old computer (around three years old) without

10.3 is not the newest. 10.4 (Tiger) has been out for almost one and a
half year now. Any Mac with built-in FireWire and more than 256 MB of
RAM can run it, and would most likely profit from it. In fact, 10.3 is
around three years old by now.

Any Mac OS X-capable Mac older than that (at least from the original
iMac and the blue/white tower G3) would profit from running 10.3.9 (the
latest Panther version), provided it has at least 256 MB RAM, preferably
512 or more.
Signature

/Jon
For contact info, run the following in Terminal:
Mail: echo 36199371860304980107073482417748002696458P|dc
Skype: echo 139576319600233690471689738P|dc

Paul Sture - 19 Nov 2006 13:16 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> installed to and old computer (around three years old) without
> probems?

10.3 runs happily on my 4 year old Mac. In fact 10.3 was a great
improvement over 10.2, both in terms of reliability and performance.

Signature

Paul Sture

Jamie Kahn Genet - 20 Nov 2006 01:46 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> 10.3 runs happily on my 4 year old Mac. In fact 10.3 was a great
> improvement over 10.2, both in terms of reliability and performance.

I run 10.3.9 at perfectly acceptable speeds on several old CRT iMacs, as
far back as the original bondi iMac (233MHz G3). Of course, I've maxed
the RAM and installed larger HDs, but that didn't cost much. These old
iMacs make great workstations :-)

Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
Signature

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Bob Harris - 19 Nov 2006 13:54 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Thank you
> Max

besides what others have said about  10.3.

10.3 is also faster than 10.2 (10.3 was lean and mean), 10.3 is
much more reliable, and 10.3 has ironed out a lot of the early Mac
OS X wrinkles.  In my opinion, versions prior to 10.3 were
advanced betas (OK 10.2 was much more than a beta, but it still
had some oddities that 10.3 smoothed out).

My computer is 3 years old, and I'm running 10.4 on it.  I have a
system that is about 6 years old also running 10.4.  Anything only
3 years old will run 10.3 or 10.4.  And if you put 10.3 on it, you
will most likely notice an improvement in performance.

Get a copy of 10.3.  It will improve your entire experience.

                                           Bob Harris
Jamie Kahn Genet - 20 Nov 2006 01:46 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>                                             Bob Harris

I concur. 10.3 is noticeably faster on my older G3 Macs, and 10.4 is
just a wee bit faster again (so long as no widgets are running), if the
old Mac supports 10.4. I'd never go back to 10.2 nowadays. It was dog
slow by comparison and hardly any recent software releases support
anything older than 10.3.9.

Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
Signature

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Jamie Kahn Genet - 20 Nov 2006 01:39 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Thank you
> Max

Any Mac with built in USB can run Panther (10.3.9). Tiger (10.4.x)
requires built in Firewire.

See either of the following two excellent sites for Mac model specs and
what versions of MacOS they will run:

<http://www.lowendmac.com/profiles.htm>
<http://www.everymac.com/>

HTH,
Jamie Kahn Genet
Signature

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Mike Dee - 29 Nov 2006 00:23 GMT
> I'm sorry for the stupid question but I'm not a Mac expert so I'm
> tring to ask to people knowing more than me about this argument.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> old 10.2 version? and, if no, someone know a software voip pc-to-pc
> having the two required version Windows and macos 10.2 or higher?


I'm a little late in coming to this thread. I hope you found some
answer to this by now (somewhere else, I'm guessing).

X-Lite is a very good freeware VoIP program that will run on Windows
and MacOS X 10.2 (Jaguar) or newer.

More info (for Win X-Lite vers 3, the Mac vers. is at 2)
http://www.xten.com/index.php?menu=Products&smenu=xlite

Download area:
http://www.xten.com/index.php?menu=download

For more links to other Mac VoIP products - a few will run on Mac OS
pre 10.3, some are shareware:

http://www.pure-mac.com/voip.html

HTH

Signature

dee

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.