Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Hardware / October 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Obsolete hardware questions (512K Mac)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael Heydon - 18 Oct 2007 01:38 GMT
Hi,

I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask, but I'm after some info on
early Macs.

I recently picked up a 512K Mac. It starts to boot but fails with the sad
mac image. It looks like someone has tried to do a repair/upgrade and it
hasn't quite worked.

The F11 chip (one of the memory chips) has been removed and replaced with
a socket, two pins are connected to wires which look like they
were at one point connected to F13 and then removed and connected to F12
(they are now cut and just floating).

Can anyone guess what they were trying to achieve?

There are a few chips around that claim to be compatible with the missing
hm50256p-15 has anyone used any of these and what were your experiences?
(I'm hoping I can just drop one into the socket and everything will just
work *fingers crossed*)

Also I wasn't able to obtain the original keyboard & mouse. Does anyone
know where I could find info on the protocol they used so I can try to rig
up a replacement? I'm probably dreaming, but they wouldn't by any chance
be compatible with a WYSE terminal keyboard would they? (I only ask
because they both use the RJ-11 connector and I have a couple of WYSE
terminals floating around)

If anyone can suggest a better place to ask about this stuff please let me
know.

Thanks,

Michael
Michael Black - 18 Oct 2007 04:58 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> mac image. It looks like someone has tried to do a repair/upgrade and it
> hasn't quite worked.

But that could mean anything.  You aren't very descriptive.  I seem to recall
that if memory is bad, you will see some sort of number underneat the sad
Mac to indicate the problem.  If there's no number, I suspect things are
in good enough shape that there may be no problem.

Note the Mac Plus would display a sad Mac if you kept the mouse button
pressed down while booting (I had something on top of the mouse).  

You also get a sad Mac if there's no bootable OS on the system (or
to that effect).  There's no hard drive in there, if you don't have
a floppy with the OS in the drive, it will display a sad Mac.  Note
also that it's a pretty old unit, and the drive may be so gunked up
(dried grease or whatever) that the drive can't work to read the
floppy.

The fact that you lack a mouse or keyboard may be the issue, I can't
say I ever tried to start a Mac Plus without either, since you can't
do anything without them, the sad Mac may be a result of them not
being there.

> The F11 chip (one of the memory chips) has been removed and replaced with
> a socket, two pins are connected to wires which look like they
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> (I'm hoping I can just drop one into the socket and everything will just
> work *fingers crossed*)

Make sure there's an even number of RAM ICs.

I had a 512KE, and it was like a 128 board.  There was a little daughter
board plugged into a header near the RAM, and of course the RAM were
256K rather than the 64K in the 128 Mac.  It was basically the same
setup as what one had to do to expand the Mac 128 to a Fat Mac.

> Also I wasn't able to obtain the original keyboard & mouse. Does anyone
> know where I could find info on the protocol they used so I can try to rig
> up a replacement? I'm probably dreaming, but they wouldn't by any chance
> be compatible with a WYSE terminal keyboard would they? (I only ask
> because they both use the RJ-11 connector and I have a couple of WYSE
> terminals floating around)

Connectors mean absolutely nothing.  I've never seen anything to indicate
the keyboard matched anything else.  The Mac Plus keyboard will work on it,
it's the same thing.  It's a standard Mac keyboard until they switched
over to the ADB bus, which means it didn't last that long.  I can't
remember if the SE had an ADB bus or not.

The mouse is easier.  It's basically the raw information from the inside
of the mouse.  (There are two slotted wheels, one for up/down the other
for left right, and each has an optocoupler straddling the wheel.  The
mouse ball moves the slotted wheel, and thus pulses are generated off
the optocoupler.  Depending on the up/down or left/right, one optocoupler
issues the signal before the other.  Thus direction is determined by
seeing which optocoupler goes high first.) The signals are buffered
with schmitt triggers, but the four signals are directly brought to
the Mac, along with the button press (and ground and five volts to
the mouse).  Hence, one can open up any mouse, grab the signal, buffer
it, and send it to the Mac.  After all, any mouse has the basic circuitry,
it just has extra to put that information into the serial signal needed
by the bus it connects to.

  Michael
David Empson - 18 Oct 2007 09:32 GMT
> > Also I wasn't able to obtain the original keyboard & mouse. Does anyone
> > know where I could find info on the protocol they used so I can try to rig
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> over to the ADB bus, which means it didn't last that long.  I can't
> remember if the SE had an ADB bus or not.

ADB was introduced on the Apple IIgs (September 1986), but only because
the Apple IIgs team got their computer out before the Mac team. (ADB was
developed for the Mac and borrowed for the IIgs.)

It was first used on the Mac with the Macintosh SE and Macintosh II
(early 1987).

Signature

David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz

Michael Heydon - 18 Oct 2007 10:58 GMT
>> I recently picked up a 512K Mac. It starts to boot but fails with the
>> sad mac image. It looks like someone has tried to do a repair/upgrade
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the sad Mac to indicate the problem.  If there's no number, I suspect
> things are in good enough shape that there may be no problem.

...snip possible causes for sad mac...

Sorry I guess I didn't make myself clear, the upgrade/repair I mentioned
refers to the F11 memory chip that has been removed and replaced with an
empty socket. I didn't mention the error code because I assumed the
missing RAM chip was the obvious cause. I only mentioned the sad mac to
show that the PSU/video/etc were in working condition.

The error code in question was 0200c0, my research suggests that 02 is
Bad RAM, 00c0 is the address where the fault occurred.

>> The F11 chip (one of the memory chips) has been removed and replaced
>> with a socket, two pins are connected to wires which look like they
>> were at one point connected to F13 and then removed and connected to
>> F12 (they are now cut and just floating).
>>
> Make sure there's an even number of RAM ICs.

There aren't, F11 is missing, leaving me with 15 remaining.
Since you mention "an even number" does that mean that instead of
replacing the missing one, I could remove another one? (obviously not as
a long term solution but just to see if the rest of the system works)

> I had a 512KE, and it was like a 128 board.  There was a little daughter
> board plugged into a header near the RAM, and of course the RAM were
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> they switched over to the ADB bus, which means it didn't last that long.
>  I can't remember if the SE had an ADB bus or not.

I didn't think it would be that easy, I guess I'll have to track one down.

> The mouse is easier.  It's basically the raw information from the inside
> of the mouse.  (There are two slotted wheels, one for up/down the other
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> circuitry, it just has extra to put that information into the serial
> signal needed by the bus it connects to.

That sounds simple enough (I think).

Thanks,

Michael
Melodious Thunk - 18 Oct 2007 22:26 GMT
> >> I recently picked up a 512K Mac. It starts to boot but fails with the
> >> sad mac image. It looks like someone has tried to do a repair/upgrade
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> The error code in question was 0200c0, my research suggests that 02 is
> Bad RAM, 00c0 is the address where the fault occurred.

I don't know how common they were, but there were several upgrades
possible on both the 128 and the 'Fat Mac' 512, if you were handy with
a soldering iron. I remember upgrading my 128 to 512 by pulling the
chips, installing sockets & bigger chips, & changing an address trace
on the motherboard (might've added a pullup resistor also).

Someone also sold a 4-Mbyte RAM board for the 128, 512, and 512ke.
That sounds more like what your board configuration might be. 'Mac
Rescue,' maybe? Changing the traces on the motherboard & adding a
socket implies something other than an identical memory chip was in
that socket once, but F11 and the 50256 don't ring any bells for me (I
did a lot of mods on those early Macs). You could try just replacing
the original chip and the original motherboard traces.

If it were mine, I'd get a Mac Plus logic board for it, which (more or
less) fits right in. They're fairly cheap, relative to the work it'll
take just tracking down whatever someone had in mind on your present
logic board. That way you can get 4 Mbytes of RAM, run System 6 or 7,
and actually use it on the internet. Good luck!

And if you ever figure it out, please post what F11 was used for. How
did 'Mac Charlie' interface? I never saw one in person.

> >> The F11 chip (one of the memory chips) has been removed and replaced
> >> with a socket, two pins are connected to wires which look like they
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> Michael
Madwen - 19 Oct 2007 05:16 GMT
> > >> I recently picked up a 512K Mac. It starts to boot but fails with the
> > >> sad mac image. It looks like someone has tried to do a repair/upgrade
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Someone also sold a 4-Mbyte RAM board for the 128, 512, and 512ke.

I had a 1 MB Dove board installed in my 128 which I still have.  I don't
recall a 4 for the 128 but, after over 20 years, my memory is a bit
foggy.   My board had to be re-seated every now and then because
expansion and contraction would work it loose eventually despite the
little fan I had installed (oh what was the name of those little fans?).  
Except for that, it worked great.  I used to load all my software into a
RAM disk and it was lightning fast.  And I seem to recall using Andy
Hertzfeld's "Switcher" to move between applications.  Fun, fun, fun.
Silicon Sam - 19 Oct 2007 05:36 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Michael

 I used to repair them old Macs back in the 80's and 90's.  Started
at an Apple dealer in '82.  So well before the Mac even came out.
Sounds like someone remove a RAM chip and pulled a couple of traces
with it.  That's why there are the extra wires, to attempt to repair
the traces they pulled.  Yes, you need a chip there, but if the traces
are not connected, the chip won't do any good.

 The original 128K machines could be upgraded by replacing the 16 RAM
chips, and there was s small circuit board that soldered into the 7
holes at the end of the processor.  That was to add addressing to the
new chips.  The later 128K board just needed the jumper, trace cut,
etc...  I did maybe a hundred of them upgrades.

 The MacRescue was my favorite memory piggyback board.  Went up to 6
MB, although only 4 would be recognized by the OS. Dove was another
popular one, but I didn't like it. I used to solder sockets to the
tops of the piggybacked chips to get a better connection.  There was
also SCSI upgrades by several manufacturers, and even some processor
speedup chips I used to sell.  Only to 16 Mhz, but back then, it was
fast...  I want to say the MacRescue added memory and a SCSI port at
the same time.  The Rescue used SIMMs, the Dove had a bunch of 256M
chips on it.  Up to 2MB on the original Dove board.

 I used to add a fan into the back of the 128k - Plus machines.  I
cut a 3" hole or so, and put a 220V fan and filter on the back.  Ran
at 110v, but ran very quiet at that voltage.  Made lots of money for a
number of years servicing them machines.

Raymond
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.